Abstract
Rarefaction is a widely applied technique for comparing the species richness of samples that differ in area, volume or sampling effort. Despite widespread adoption of sample-based rarefaction curves, serious concerns persist. In this paper, we address the issue of the spatial arrangement of sampling units when computing sample-based rarefaction curves. If the spatial arrangement is neglected when building rarefaction curves, a direct comparison of species richness estimates obtained for areas that differ in their spatial extent is not possible, even if they were sampled with a similar intensity. We demonstrate a major effect of the spatial extent of the samples on species richness estimates through the use of data from a temperate forest. We show that the use of Spatially Constrained Rarefaction (SCR) results in species richness estimates that are directly comparable for areas that differ in spatial extent. As expected, standard rarefaction curves tend to overestimate species richness because they ignore the spatial autocorrelation of species composition among sampling units. This spatial autocorrelation is captured by the SCR, thus providing a useful technique for characterizing the spatial structure of biodiversity patterns. Further work is necessary to determine how species richness estimates and the shape of the SCR are affected by the method of spatial constraint and sampling unit density and distribution.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Abbreviations
- SCR:
-
Spatially Constrained Rarefaction
- SAR:
-
Species Area Relationship
- CI:
-
Confidence Interval
References
Bacaro, G. and C. Ricotta. 2007. A spatially explicit measure of beta diversity. Community Ecol. 8: 41–46.
Chiarucci, A., G. Bacaro and D. Rocchini. 2008a. Quantifying plant species diversity in a Natura 2000 network: Old ideas and new proposals. Biol. Conserv. 141: 2608–2618.
Chiarucci, A., G. Bacaro, D. Rocchini and L. Fattorini. 2008b. Discovering and rediscovering the sample-based rarefaction formula in ecological literature. Community Ecol. 9: 121–123.
Chiarucci, A. and I. Bonini. 2005. Quantitative floristics as a tool for the assessment of plant diversity in Tuscan forests. Forest Ecol. Manag. 212: 160–170.
Collins, M. and D. Simberloff. 2009. Rarefaction and nonrandom spatial dispersion patterns. Environ. Ecol. Stat. 16: 89–103.
Colwell, R.K., C.X. Mao and J. Chang. 2004. Interpolating, extrapolating, and comparing incidence-based species accumulation curves. Ecology 85: 2717–2727.
Condit, R., S.P. Hubbell, J.V. Lafrankie, R. Sukumar, R. Manokaran, R.B. Foster and P.S. Ashton. 1996. Species-area and species-individual relationships for tropical trees: A comparison of three 50-ha plots. J. Ecol. 84: 549–562.
Connor, E. F. and E. D. McCoy. 1979. The statistics and biology of the species-area relationship. Am. Nat. 113:791–833.
Dale, M.B. 1998. Space, scale and description. Abstr. Bot. 22: 67–80.
Dugan, N.R. 2005. Using Dirichlet tessellation to help estimate microbial biomass concentrations. J. Microbiol. Meth. 63: 205–210.
Fattorini, L. 2007. Statistical inference on accumulation curves for inventorying forest diversity: A design-based critical look. Plant Biosyst. 141: 231–242.
Gering, J.C., T.O. Crist and J.A. Veech. 2003. Additive partitioning of species diversity across multiple spatial scales: implications for regional conservation of biodiversity. Conserv. Biol. 17: 488–499.
Gotelli, N.J. and R.K. Colwell. 2001. Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecol. Lett. 4: 379–391.
Hastie, T., R. Tibshirani and J. Friedman. 2001. The Elements of Statistical Learning. Springer, New York, USA.
Hui, C.. 2008. On species-area and species accumulation curves: A comment on Chong and Stohlgren’s index. Ecol. Indic. 8: 327–329.
Hurlbert, S.H. 1971. The nonconcept of species diversity: a critique and alternative parameters. Ecology 52: 577–586.
Kobayashi, S. 1974. The species-area relation I. A model for discrete sampling. Res. Popul. Ecol. 15: 223–237.
Koellner, T., A.M. Hersperger and T. Wohlgemuth. 2004. Rarefaction method for assessing plant species diversity on a regional scale. Ecography 27: 532–544.
Mao, C.X., R.K. Colwell and J. Chang. 2005. Estimating the species accumulation curve using mixtures. Biometrics 61: 433–441
Mora, C., D.P. Tittensor and R.A. Myers. 2008. The completeness of taxonomic inventories for describing the global diversity and distribution of marine fishes. Proc. Roy. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 275: 149–155.
Nekola, J.C. and J.H. Brown. 2007. The wealth of species: ecological communities, complex systems and the legacy of Frank Preston. Ecol. Lett. 10: 188–196.
Nekola, J.C. and P.S. White. 1999. The distance decay of similarity in biogeography and ecology. J. Biogeogr. 26: 867–878.
Palmer, M.W. 1995. How should one count species? Nat. Area J. 15:124–135.
Palmer, M.W. 2005. Distance decay in an old-growth neotropical forest. J. Veg. Sci. 16:161–166.
Palmer, M.W., P.G. Earls, B.W. Hoagland, P.S. White and T. Wohlgemuth. 2002. Quantitative tools for perfecting species lists. Environmetrics 13: 121–137.
Palmer, M.W., J.D. Fridley and D.J. McGlinn. 2008. Artifacts and artifictions in biodiversity research. Folia Geobot. 43: 245–257.
Palmer, M.W., R.K. Peet, R.A. Reed., W. Xi and P.S. White. 2007. A multiscale study of vascular plants in a North Carolina piedmont forest. Ecology 88: 2674.
Palmer M.W. and P.S. White. 1994. Scale dependence and the species-area relationship. Am. Nat. 144: 717–740.
Reed R.A., R.K. Peet, M.W. Palmer and P.S. White. 1993. Scale dependence of vegetation-environment correlations: a case study of a North Carolina piedmont woodland. J. Veg. Sci. 4: 329–340.
Rutkowski, L. J.H. Siekmann, R. Tadeusiewicz and L.A. Zadeh. 2004. Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing - ICAISC 2004, 7th International Conference, Zakopane, Poland, June 7–11, 2004, Proceedings. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3070, Springer, New York, USA.
Sanders, H.L. 1968. Marine benthic diversity: a comparative study. Am. Nat. 102: 243–282.
Scheiner, S.M. 2003. Six types of species-area curves. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 12: 441–447.
Scheiner, S.M., S.B. Cox, M.R. Willig, G.G. Mittelbach, C, Osenberg and M. Kaspari. 2000. Species richness, species-area curves and Simpson’s paradox. Evol. Ecol. Res. 2: 791–802.
Schlup, B.M. and H.H. Wagner. 2008. Effects of study design and analysis on the spatial community structure detected by multiscale ordination. J. Veg. Sci. 19: 621–632.
Shinozaki, K. 1963. Note on the species area curve. Proceedings of the 10th Annual Meeting of Ecological Society of Japan 50 (in Japanese)..
Simberloff, D. 1972. Properties of the rarefaction diversity measurement. Am. Nat. 106: 414–418.
Soininen, J., R. McDonald and H. Hillebrand. 2007. The distance decay of similarity in ecological communities. Ecography 30: 3–12.
Thompson, G.G., P.C. Withers, E.R. Pianka and S.A. Thompson. 2003. Assessing biodiversity with species accumulation curves; inventories of small reptiles by pit-trapping in Western Australia. Austral. Ecol. 28: 361–383.
Tobler, W. 1970. A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region. Econ. Geogr. 46: 234–240.
Ugland, K.I., J.S. Gray and K.E. Ellingsen. 2003. The species-accumulation curve and estimation of species richness. J. Anim. Ecol. 72: 888–897.
Veltkamp, R.C. 1992. The γ-neighbourhood graph. Comp. Geom. Theor. Appl. 1:227–246.
Voronoi, G. 1907. Nouvelles applications des paramètres continus à la théorie des formes quadratiques. J. Reine Angew. Math. 133: 97–178
Wagner, H.H. 2003. Spatial covariance in plant communities: integrating ordination, geostatistics, and variance testing. Ecology 84: 1045–1057.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Chiarucci, A., Bacaro, G., Rocchini, D. et al. Spatially constrained rarefaction: incorporating the autocorrelated structure of biological communities into sample-based rarefaction. COMMUNITY ECOLOGY 10, 209–214 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1556/ComEc.10.2009.2.11
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/ComEc.10.2009.2.11