Abstract
The effect of substrate water potential (ψW) in root growth and proline content of maize seedlings of Tuxpeño Sequía C0 (TSC0) and Tuxpeño Sequía C8 (TSC8), sensitive and resistant to drought respectively, were evaluated. Seventy two hours old seedlings, with 5 cm root length, were maintained for 24 h in vermiculite at ψW between −0.03 and −2.35 MPa. Root length, fresh and dry weight, number of lateral roots and proline content were evaluated. Root enlargement of TSCO was significantly higher than TSC8 at −0.03 MPa, but the response was opposite at low substrate ψW. The number of lateral roots was reduced in 23% in TSC8 at the lowest substrate ψW (−2.35 MPa) but it was not significantly affected in TSC0. A higher proline content was quantified in the cell division root region than in differentiation root region in both maize populations (5.64 and 6.96 umol 100 mg−1 of dry weight in TSC0 and TSC8, respectively); and ψW between −0.65 and −2.35 MPa induced a drastic and significant increase of proline content in both populations. The statistical interaction between maize population, substrate ψW, and root region was highly significant (P≤0.0039) for proline content. The results demonstrated that eight cycles of recurrent selection of Tuxpeño for drought tolerance induced a reduction of the number of secondary roots and proline content in the differentiation root region, but a proline increase in the cell division region when root seedling grow under no restrictive water conditions (ψW=−0.03 MPa), beside recurrent selection modified root reaction to low substrate ψW by accumulation of dry matter and proline.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Akkas, M; A.K.M.A. Prodhan; M.A. Haque. 1999. Effect of water stress on the anatomical characters of root and item of maize plant. Indian J. Agric. Res. 33:245–253.
Albarran R., A.E. 2004. Efectos de la restricción de humedad en la fisiología, crecimiento, componentes del rendimiento y calidad del grano de centeno (Secale cereale L.) y trigo (Triticum aestivum L). Tesis de maestría. Colegio de Postgraduados, Montecillo, México. 104 p.
Bolaños, J.; G.O. Edmeades. 1993a. Eight cycles of selection for drought tolerance in lowland tropical maize. I. Responses in grain yield, biomass and radiation utilization. Field Crops Res. 31: 233–252.
Bolaños, J.; G.O. Edmeades. 1993b. Eight cycles of selection for drought tolerance in lowland tropical maize. II. Responses in reproductive behavior. Field Crops Res. 31: 253–268.
Bates, L.W.; Waldren R.P.; Teare L.D. 1973. Rapid determination of proline for water stress studies. Plant and Soil 39: 205–207.
Cruz, R.T.; W.R. Jordan; M.C. Drew. 1992. Structural changes and associated reduction of hydraulic conductance in roots of Sorghum bicolor L. following exposure to water deficit. Plant Physiol. 99: 203–212.
Dhanda, S.S.; G.S. Seit; R.K. Behl. 2002. Inheritance of seedling traits under drought stress conditions in bread wheat. Cereal Res. Comm. 30: 293–300.
Ellis, R.H.; T.D. Hong; E.H. Roberts. 1985. General approaches to promoting seed germination. In: Handbook of seed technology for genebanks. Vol. II. Compendium of specific germination. International Board for Plant Genetic Resources. Rome. pp. 221–237.
Ferrarotto S., M. 2003. Proline accumulation in pigweed plants (Amaranthus dubius Mart, and Amaranthus emeritus L.) growing under water stress conditions. Rev. Fac. Agron., Universidad del Zulia 20: 453–460.
Hochholdinger, F.; K. Woll; M. Sauer; D. Dembinsky. 2004. Genetic dissection of root formation in maize (Zea mays) reveals root-type specific developmental programmes. Annals Bot. 93: 359–368.
Huang, B.; H. Gao. 2000. Root physiological characteristics associated with drought resistance in tall fescue cultivars. Crop Sci. 40: 196–203.
Irizar-Garzar, M.B.G; C.B. Peña-Valdivia. 2000. Chlorophyll and photosynthetic oxygen evolution in water-stressed triticale (Tricosecale Wittmack) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L) during vegetative stage. Cereal Res. Comm. 28 (4): 387–394.
Khan, I.A.; H.A.S. Habib S.; M.H.N. Tahir. 2004. Selection criteria based on seedling growth parameters in maize varies under normal and water stress conditions. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 6(2):252–256.
Maiti, R.K., V.P. Singh, P. Wesche-Ebeling, E. Sanchez-Arreola, T. Hernandez, E. Aguilar-Najera. 2004. Research advances on cold, drought and salinity tolerance and its mechanisms of resistance in maize (Zea mays L.) - a review. Crop Res. (Hisar) 27:1–29.
Meloni, D.R.; Oliva M.A.; Ruiz H.A.; Martinez C.A. 2001. Contribution of proline and inorganic solutes to osmotic adjustment in cotton under salt stress. J. Plant Nutr. 24: 599–612.
Nilsen, E.T.; D.M. Orcutt. 1996. Physiology of plants under stress. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. USA. 689 p.
Ober, E.S.; R.E. Sharp. 1994. Proline accumulation in maize (Zea mays L.) primary roots at low water potentials. Plant Physiol. 105: 981–987.
Prechamandra, G.S.; Saneora H.; Fujita K.; Ogata S. 1992. Osmotic adjustment and stomatal response to water deficit in maize. J. Exp. Bot. 43: 1451–1456.
Raymond, M.J.; Smirnoff N. 2002. Proline metabolism and transport in maize seedlings at low water potential. Ann. Bot. 89: 813–823.
Sánchez-Urdaneta, A.B.; C.B. Peña-Valdivia; J.R. Aguirre R.; C. Trejo; E. Cárdenas; A. Galicia J. 2003. Evaluatión de la permeabilidad de las membranas radicales de plántulas de frijol (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) silvestre y domesticado bajo déficit de humedad. Interciencia 28: 597–603.
Sánchez-Urdaneta, A.B.; C.B. Peña-Valdivia; J.R. Aguirre R.; C. Trejo; E. Cárdenas. 2004. Efectos del potential de agua en el crecimiento radical de Agave salmiana Otto ex Salm-Dyck. Interciencia 29: 626–631.
SAS Institute. 1999–2000. SAS user’s guide: Statistics. Version 8.1. SAS institute Inc. Cary, NO USA. 1290 p.
Sharp, R.E.; W.K. Silk; T.C. Hsiao. 1988. Growth of the maize primary root at low water potentials. I. Spatial distribution of expansive growth. Plant Physiol. 87: 50–57.
Sofo, A.; B. Dichio; C. Xiloyannis; A. Masia. 2004. Lipoxygenase activity and proline accumulation in leaves and roots of olive trees in response to drought stress. Physiol. Plantarum 121 (1):58–65.
Tuberosa, R.; S. Salvi; M.C. Sanguineti; P. Landi; M. Maccaferri; S. Coti. 2002. Mapping QTLs regulating morpho-physiological traits and yield, case studies, shortcomings and perspectives in drought-stressed maize. Ann. Bot. 89: 941–963.
Turner, N.C. 1997. Further progress in crop water relations. Adv. Agron. 58:293–338.
Umayal, L; R.C. Babu; P. Chezhian; S. Sadasivam. 2001. Water stress induced histological and enzymatic changes in roots of rice cultivars. Plant Archives 1 (1/2):31–34.
XingYuan, Z.; C. FuLiang, L. GuoHua. 2004. Physiological responses of two warm-season turfgrasses to persistent soil drought stress. Acta Prataculturae Sinica 13:84–88.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Sánchez-Urdaneta, A.B., Peña-Valdivia, C.B., Trejo, C. et al. Root growth and proline content in drought sensitive and tolerant maize (Zea mays L.) seedlings under different water potentials. CEREAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS 33, 697–704 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1556/CRC.33.2005.2-3.137
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/CRC.33.2005.2-3.137