Skip to main content
Log in

On Wigner’s different usages of models

  • Published:
Acta Physica Hungarica Series B, Quantum Electronics

Abstract

An extensive reading of Wigner’s scholarly contributions brings to light how he was led to pursue two radically different purposes when he appealed to models. The present paper sketches the logical background for this distinction, and illustrates it with some specific models Wigner considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. E.P. Wigner.The Collected Works, eds. A.S. Wightman and J. Mehra, Springer, Heidelberg, 1995-2001.

    Google Scholar 

  2. G. Emch and C. Liu,The Logic of Thermostatistical Physics, Springer, Heidelberg, 2002.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. E.H. Lieb and D.C. Mattis, eds.,Mathematical Physics in One-Dimension, Academic Press, New York, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. Church,Introduction to Mathematical Logic, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, 1996.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. E. Scheibe,Between Rationalism and Empiricism: Selected Papers in the Philosophy of Physics, Springer, Heidelberg. 2001.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. I. Lakatos,Proofs and Refutations: The Logic of Mathematical Discovery, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1976.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. T. Kuhn.The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  8. W. Heisenberg,Z. Physik 77 (1932) 1.

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. M. Gell-Mann and Y. Ne’eman, eds.,The Eightfold Way, Benjamin, New York, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  10. N. Bohr,Nature 137 (1936) 344.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. G. Breit and E.P. Wigner,Phys. Rev. 49 (1936) 519.

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. V. Weisskopf and D.H. Ewing,Phys. Rev. 57 (1940) 472 [Erratum, ibid. 935].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. M.L. Mehta,Random Matrices, Academic Press, Boston, 1991.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. V. Bargmann,Ann. Math. 59 (1954) 1.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. J.S. Bell,Physics 1 (1964) 195; reprinted in J.S. Bell,Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics, Cambridge Univ. Press, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  16. D. Mermin,Am. J. Phys. 58 (1990) 731.

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. N. Gisin et al.,Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 (1998) 3563.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. K. Hess and W. Philipp,Europhys. Lett. 57 (2002) 775.

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. J. von Neumann,Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Princeton Univ. Press, 1955.

  20. H. Zeh,Found. of Phys. 1 (1970) 69.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. K. Hepp,Helv. Phys. Acta 45 (1972) 237.

    Google Scholar 

  22. B. Whitten-Wolfe and G.G. EmchHelv. Phys. Acta 49 (1976) 45.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. K.C. Hannabus,Helv. Phys. Acta 57 (1984).

  24. H. Araki, inFundamental Aspects of Quantum Mechanics, eds. V. Gorini and F. Frigerio, Plenum, 1986, p. 23.

  25. B. Gaveau and L.S. Schulman,J. Stat. Phys. 58 (1990) 1209.

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. V.P. Belavkin, quant-ph/0208087 v2 (2002).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Emch, G.G. On Wigner’s different usages of models. Acta Phys. Hung. B 20, 105–108 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1556/APH.20.2004.1-2.20

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/APH.20.2004.1-2.20

Keywords

PACS

Navigation