Skip to main content
Log in

On positive and negative ionospheric storms

  • Published:
Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica Hungarica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A study is made of the intense storms of March 13–15, 1989 (D st = −600nT), October 20–21, 1989 (D st = −266 nT) and April 1–2, 1973 (D st = −211 nT) in regards to the appearance of positive storm before the beginning of a geomagnetic disturbance in the mid-latitudes and the occurrence of strong negative phase at the equator. F2 region global structure response to the geomagnetic storms was studied using ƒoF2 data obtained during the storms from a global network of ionosonde stations. Investigated phenomena were only observed, on October 20, 1989, in only three of the nineteen plots representing ∼16% occurrence for the case study of March and October 1989 storms: the positive storms at Slough (54.4°N) and Uppsala (59.86°N) and a negative storm at Ouagadougou (12.4°N). These ionospheric storms were caused by the southward turning of B z at ∼2100 UT on October 18 which got to a change in B z of δB z = 12.2 nT at 2300 UT on October 18. In the case of the storm of April 1–2, 1973, the phenomena had ∼69% occurrence: the positive storms at Wakkanai (45.4° N), Akita (39.7° N), Kokubunji (35.7° N), Kiev (50.5° N) Sofia (42.7° N), Ottawa (45.4° N), Boulder (40.0° N) and Point Arguello (35.6° N) and a negative storm at Manila (14.7° N). These ionospheric storms appear to be caused by the southward turning of B z at ∼1500 UT which got to a change in B z of δB z = 13.6 nT at 1900 UT on March 31. The non explanation of these phenomena before now is because in the studies of ionospheric storms it is assumed that the beginning of any particular disturbance is defined by the onset of the magnetic storm. The use of sudden storm commencement (SSC) and main phase onset (MPO) for fixing the beginning of magnetic and ionospheric storms is fraught with problems that render a determination of the exact onset time difficult. The notion of onset of the magnetic storm as a prevailing idea restricted the geoeffectiveness of the solar wind to post onset time thereby foreclosing the explanation of any aspect of the morphology of ionospheric storms whose origin precede the onset reference time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akasofu S I 1970: Ann. Geophys., 26, 443–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behannon K W, Burlaga L F, Hewish A 1991: J. Geophys. Res., 96, 21, 213–21, 225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blagoveshchensky D V, Pirog O M, Polekh N M, Chistyakova L V 2003: J. Atmos. Sol. Terr. Phys., 65, 203–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boudouridis A, Zesta E, Lyons L R 2005: J. Geophys. Res., 110, A05214, doi: 1029/2004JA010704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buonsanto M J, Fuller-Rowell T J 1997: Eos, Transactions, AGU, 78(01), 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burlaga L F, Behannon K W, Klein L W 1987: J. Geophys. Res., 92, 5725–5734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaman-Lal 2000: J. Atmos. Sol. Terr. Phys., 62, 3–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandra S, Spencer N W 1976: J. Geophys. Res., 81(28), 5018–5026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang C A, St Maurice J P 1991: Can. J. Phys., 69, 1007–1031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chukwuma V U 2003a: Acta Geod. Geoph. Hung., 38, 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chukwuma V U 2003b: Acta Geoph. Polonica, 51, 459–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chukwuma V U 2005: Nigerian Journal of Physics (in press)

  • Daglis I A 1997: Geophysical Monograph Series, 98, AGU Washington, DC, 107–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daglis A, Viera L E A, Echer, Gonzalez W D, Cl’ua de Gonzalez A L, Guarnieri F L, Balmaceda L, da Santos J, Silva M R, de Lucas A, Schuch N J 2004: Braz. J. Phys., 34(4b), 1542–1546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dal Lago A, Gonzalez W D, Cl’ua de Gonzalez A L, Vieira L E A 2001: J. Atmos. Sol. Terr. Phys., 63(5), 451–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dal Lago A, Vieira L E A, Echer E, Gonzalez W D, Cl’ua de Gonzalez A L, Guarnieri F L, Balmaceda L, Santos J, da Silva M R, de Lucas A, Schuch N J 2004: Braz. J. Phys., 34(4b), 1542–1546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danilov A D 2001: J. Atmos. Sol. Terr. Phys., 63, 431–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis C J, Wild M N, Lockwood M, Tulunay Y K 1997: Ann. Geophysicae, 15, 217–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez W D, Tsurutani B T 1987: Planetary and Space Science, 35, 1101–1109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez W D, Clua de Gonzalez A L, Dal Lago A, Tsurutani B T, Arballo J K, Lakhina G S, Buti B, Ito C M 1998: Geophys. Res. Lett., 25, 963–969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez W D, Clua de Gonzalez A L, Sobrai J H A, Dal Lago A, Vieira L E 2001: J. Atmos. Sol. Terr. Phys., 63, 403–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez W D, Tsurutani B T, Lepping R P, Schwenn R 2002: J. Atmos. Sol. Terr. Phys., 64, 173–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamide Y 2001: J. Atmos. Sol. Terr. Phys., 63, 413–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamide Y, Yokoyama N, Gonzalez W D, Tsurutani B T, Brekke A, Masuda S 1998a: J. Geophys. Res., 103, 6917–6921.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamide Y, Baumjohann W, Daglis I A, Gonzalez W D, Grande M, Joselyn J A, McPherron R L, Philips J L, Reeves E G D, Rostoker G, Sharma A S, Singer H J, Tsurutani B T, Vasyliunas V M 1998b: J. Geophys. Res., 103, 17,705–17, 728.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kane R P 2005: J. Geophys. Res., 110, A02213, doi: 10.1029/2004JA010799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prolss G W 1995: In: Handbook of Atmospheric Electrodynamics, H Volland ed., 2 CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL., 19-5-248.

  • Prolss G W, Ocko M 2000: Adv. Space Res., 26(1), 131–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richmond A D, Matsushita S 1975: J. Geophs. Res., 80, 2839–2850.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahai Y, Fagundes P R, Becker-Guedes F, Bolzan M J A, Abalde J R, Pillat V G, de Jesus R, Lima W L C, Crowley G, Shiokawa K, Macdougall J W, Lan H T, Igarashi K, Bittencourt J A 2005: J. Geophs. Res., 110, A12S91, doi: 10.1029/2004JA010999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soicher H 1972: Nature Phys. Sci., 239, 93–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Testud J, Amayenc P, Blanc M 1975: J. Atmos. Phys., 37, 989–1009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsurutani B T, Gonzalez W D 1997: Geophysical Monograph Series, 98, AGU Washington, DC, 77–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsurutani B T, Gonzalez W D, Lakhina G S, Alex S 2003: J. Geophys. Res., 108(A7), 1268–1275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsurutani B T, Gonzalez W D, Zhou X-Y, Lepping R P, Bothmer V 2004: J. Atmos. Sol. Terr. Phys., 66, 147–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vieira L E, Gonzalez W D, Clua de Gonzalez A L, Dal Lago A 2001: J. Atmos. Sol. Terr. Phys., 63, 457–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. U. Chukwuma.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chukwuma, V.U. On positive and negative ionospheric storms. Acta Geod. Geoph. Hung 42, 1–21 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1556/AGeod.42.2007.1.1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/AGeod.42.2007.1.1

Keywords

Navigation