Abstract
Amblyopia is a visual disorder caused by an anomalous early visual experience. It has been suggested that suppression of the visual input from the weaker eye might be a primary underlying mechanism of the amblyopic syndrome. However, it is still an unresolved question to what extent neural responses to the visual information coming from the amblyopic eye are suppressed during binocular viewing. To address this question we measured event-related potentials (ERP) to foveal face stimuli in amblyopic patients, both in monocular and binocular viewing conditions. The results revealed no difference in the amplitude and latency of early components of the ERP responses between the binocular and fellow eye stimulation. On the other hand, early ERP components were reduced and delayed in the case of monocular stimulation of the amblyopic eye as compared to the fellow eye stimulation or to binocular viewing. The magnitude of the amblyopic effect measured on the ERP amplitudes was comparable to that found on the fMRI responses in the fusiform face area using the same face stimuli and task conditions. Our findings showing that the amblyopic effects present on the early ERP components in the case of monocular stimulation are not manifested in the ERP responses during binocular viewing suggest that input from the amblyopic eye is completely suppressed already at the earliest stages of visual cortical processing when stimuli are viewed by both eyes.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Alais, D., Melcher, D. (2007) Strength and coherence of binocular rivalry depends on shared stimulus complexity. Vision Res. 47, 269–279.
Anderson, S.J., Holliday, I.E., Harding, G. F. (1999) Assessment of cortical dysfunction in human strabismic amblyopia using magnetoencephalography (MEG). Vision Res. 39, 1723–1738.
Bankó, E.M., Gál, V., Kõrtvélyes, J., Kovács, G., Vidnyánszky, Z. (2011) Dissociating the effect of noise on sensory processing and overall decision difficulty. J. Neurosci. 31, 2663–2674.
Barnes, G.R., Hess, R. F., Dumoulin, S.O., Achtman, R.L., Pike, G. B. (2001) The cortical deficit in humans with strabismic amblyopia. J. Physiol. 533, 281–297.
Brett, M., Anton, J., Valabregue, R., Poline, J. (2002) Region of interest analysis using an SPM toolbox. Neuroimag. 16, S497.
Conner, I.P., Odom, J.V., Schwartz, T.L., Mendola, J. D. (2007) Monocular activation of VI and V2 in amblyopic adults measured with functional magnetic resonance imaging. JAAPO. 11, 341–350.
Davis, A.R., Sloper, J.J., Neveu, M. M., Hogg, C.R., Morgan, M.J., Holder, G. E. (2003) Electrophysiological and psychophysical differences between early- and late-onset strabismic amblyopia. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 44, 610–617.
Deffke, I., Sander, T., Heidenreich, J., Sommer, W., Curio, G., Trahms, L., Lueschow, A. (2007) MEG/EEG sources of the 170-ms response to faces are co-localized in the fusiform gyrus. Neuroimag. 35, 1495–1501.
Haynes, J. D., Deichmann, R., Rees, G. (2005) Eye-specific effects of binocular rivalry in the human lateral geniculate nucleus. Natur. 438, 496–499.
Hess, R.F., Thompson, B., Gole, G., Mullen, K. T. (2009) Deficient responses from the lateral geniculate nucleus in humans with amblyopia. Eur. J. Neurosci. 29, 1064–1070.
Hesselmann, G., Malach, R. (2011) The link between fMRI-BOLD activation and perceptual awareness is “stream-invariant” in the human visual system. Cereb. Corte. 21, 2829–2837.
Hou, C., Pettet, M.W., Norcia, A. M. (2008) Abnormalities of coherent motion processing in strabismic amblyopia: Visual-evoked potential measurements. J. Vis. 8, 2.1–12.
Kovács, G., Cziraki, C., Vidnyánszky, Z., Schweinberger, S.R., Greenlee, M. W. (2008) Position-specific and position-invariant face aftereffects reflect the adaptation of different cortical areas. Neuroimag. 43, 156–164.
Kreiman, G., Fried, I., Koch, C. (2002) Single-neuron correlates of subjective vision in the human medial temporal lobe. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. US. 99, 8378–8383.
Kreiman, G., Fried, I., Koch, C. (2005) Responses of single neurons in the human brain during flash suppression. In: Alais, D., Blake, R. (eds) Binocular rivalry. MIT Press, pp. 213–230.
Lerner, Y., Hendler, T., Malach, R., Harel, M., Leiba, H., Stolovitch, C., Pianka, P. (2006) Selective fovea-related deprived activation in retinotopic and high-order visual cortex of human amblyopes. Neuroimag. 33, 169–179.
Lerner, Y., Pianka, P., Azmon, B., Leiba, H., Stolovitch, C., Loewenstein, A., Harel, M., Hendler, T., Malach, R. (2003) Area-specific amblyopic effects in human occipitotemporal object representations. Neuro. 40, 1023–1029.
Li, J., Thompson, B., Lam, C. S. Y., Deng, D., Chan, L. Y. L., Maehara, G., Woo, G. C., Yu, M., Hess, R. F. (2011) The role of suppression in amblyopia. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 52, 4169–4176.
Li, X., Dumoulin, S.O., Mansouri, B., Hess, R. F. (2007) Cortical deficits in human amblyopia: their regional distribution and their relationship to the contrast detection deficit. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 48, 1575–1591.
Linkenkaer-Hansen, K., Palva, J.M., Sams, M., Hietanen, J.K., Aronen, H.J., Ilmoniemi, R. J. (1998) Face-selective processing in human extrastriate cortex around 120 ms after stimulus onset revealed by magneto- and electroencephalography. Neurosci. Lett. 253, 147–150.
Manny, R.E., Levi, D. M. (1982) The visually evoked potential in humans with amblyopia: pseudorandom modulation of uniform field and sine-wave gratings. Exp. Brain Res. 47, 15–27.
Melloni, L., Schwiedrzik, C.M., Rodriguez, E., Singer, W. (2009) (Micro)Saccades, corollary activity and cortical oscillations. Trends Cogn. Sci. (RegulEd.. 13, 239–245.
Moradi, F., Koch, C., Shimojo, S. (2005) Face adaptation depends on seeing the face. Neuro. 45, 169–175.
Muckli, L., Kiess, S., Tonhausen, N., Singer, W., Goebel, R., Sireteanu, R. (2006) Cerebral correlates of impaired grating perception in individual, psychophysical assessed human amblyopes. Vision Res. 46, 506–526.
Parisi, V., Scarale, M.E., Balducci, N., Fresina, M., Campos, E. C. (2010) Electrophysiological detection of delayed postretinal neural conduction in human amblyopia. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 51, 5041–5048.
Pasley, B.N., Mayes, L. C., Schultz, R. T. (2004) Subcortical discrimination of unperceived objects during binocular rivalry. Neuro. 42, 163–172.
Sadeh, B., Podlipsky, I., Zhdanov, A., Yovel, G. (2010) Event-related potential and functional MRI measures of face-selectivity are highly correlated: a simultaneous ERP-fMRI investigation. Hum. Brain Mapp. 31, 1490–1501.
Sheinberg, D.L., Logothetis, N. K. (1997) The role of temporal cortical areas in perceptual organization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. US. 94, 3408–3413.
Tong, F., Engel, S. A. (2001) Interocular rivalry revealed in the human cortical blind-spot representation. Natur. 411, 195–199.
Tong, F., Nakayama, K., Vaughan, J.T., Kanwisher, N. (1998) Binocular rivalry and visual awareness in human extrastriate cortex. Neuro. 21, 753–759.
Wunderlich, K., Schneider, K.A., Kastner, S. (2005) Neural correlates of binocular rivalry in the human lateral geniculate nucleus. Nat. Neurosci. 8, 1595–1602.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Dedicated to Professor József Hámori on the occasion of his 80th birthday.
Rights and permissions
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Körtvélyes, J., Bankó, É.M., Andics, A. et al. Visual Cortical Responses to the Input from the Amblyopic Eye are Suppressed During Binocular Viewing. BIOLOGIA FUTURA 63 (Suppl 1), 65–79 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1556/ABiol.63.2012.Suppl.1.7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/ABiol.63.2012.Suppl.1.7