Abstract
Two series of studies are reported dealing with (1) psychophysical characteristics and (2) interactions of visceroceptive and somatosensoric information processing. The first studies characterized detection, graduation and localisation of visceral as compared to somatic stimuli. The second series investigated somatovisceral discrimination, masking, and summation at different levels of awareness.
Methods: Distension of the sigmoid colon served as standard model. The visceral stimulus was applied by a balloon probe in the sigmoid colon, the external abdominal stimulus by a ring-shaped stimulator at two abdominal sites. A forced-choice-paradigm with two observation intervals was applied (multiple staircase) to estimate interactions between somatosensation and visceroception.
Results: The visceral distension stimulus can be detected or discriminated correctly without conscious sensation. Visceral localization of stimuli requires conscious sensation. Combining visceral and somatic stimuli resulted in distinct elevation of visceral thresholds demonstrating somatosensory masking of the visceral stimulus. There are characteristic somato-visceral and viscero-somatic differences in masking and qualitative differences between implicit and explicit processing stages. Specific electrocortical reactions to visceral stimuli could be shown.
Discussion: Visceroception is represented on the highest functional level as a fairly independent submodality of body perception. There are several hints that visceroception and protopathic somatic sensitivity follow the same major paths and comprise the same ontogenetic origin. Perceptual interactions are determined by modality and awareness and depend on the task. The role of implicit and explicit body perception considering the body self and its significance in the context of consiousness are discussed.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Hölzl, R., Erasmus, L.-P., Möltner, A. (1996) Detection, discrimination and sensation of visceral stimuli. Biol. Psychol. 42, 199–214.
Hölzl, R., Neidig, C. W., Erasmus, L.-P., Möltner, A. (1998) Somatovisceral interactions in visceral perception: Abdominal masking of colonic stimuli. Integr. Physiol. Behav. Sci. 33, 264–279.
Erasmus, L.-P., Neidig, C., Möltner, A., Hölzl, R. (1996). Beeinflussung der viszeralen Sensibilität durch somatosensorische Signale. Teil II: Summation. Forschungsberichte aus dem Otto-Selz-Institut für Psychologie und Erziehungswissenschaft der Universität Mannheim: Nr. 28.
Hölzl, R., Möltner, A., Neidig, C., Kleinböhl, D. (1996) Merkmale und Kriterien interozeptiver Wahrnehmung. In: Mandel, K. (ed.). Bericht über den 40. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie. Hogrefe, Göttingen.
Hölzl, R., Möltner, A., Neidig, C. W. (1998) Body perception and consciousness: contributions of interoception research. Acta Biol. Hung. 49, 77–86.
Ádám, G. (1967). Interoception and behaviour. An experimental study. Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest.
Ádám, G. (1998). Visceral perception: Understanding internal cognition. Plenum, New York, London, Washington, Moscow.
Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes’ Error. Emotion, reason and the human brain. Grosset/Putnam, New York.
Damasio, A. R. (2000). The feeling of what happens. Body and emotion in the feeling of consciousness. Heinemann, London.
Kihlstrom, J. F. (1997) Consciousness and me-ness. In: Cohen J. D., Schooler, J. W. (eds). Scientific approaches to consciousness. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, pp. 451–468.
Sacks, O. (1984). A leg to stand on. Duckworth, London.
Sacks, O. (1985). The man who mistook his wife for a hat. Duckworth, London.
Sacks, O. (1995). An anthropologist on Mars. Seven paradoxical tales. Knopf, New York.
Erasmus, L. P., Püll, O., Kratzmair, M., Hölzl, R. (1994) Method and apparatus for pressure-controlled distension of the lower gastrointestinal tract. Med. Engin. Phys. London 16(4), 338–347.
James, W. (1890). Principles of Psychology. Macmillan and Co. Ltd., London.
Skinner, B. F. (1938). Science and human behavior. Free Press, New York.
Luria, A. R. (1972). The man with a shattered world. Basic Books, New York. [Orig Moskau 1968].
Head, H. (1893) On disturbances of sensation with especial reference to the pain of visceral disease. Brain 16, 1–133.
Mackenzie, J. (1893) Some points bearing on the association of sensory disorders and visceral disease. Brain 16, 321–353.
Cervero, F. (1994) Sensory innervation of the viscera: peripheral basis of visceral pain. Physiol. Rev. 74, 5–138.
Möltner, A., Kleinböhl, D., Schellberg, D., Hölzl, R. (1997). Kolonisch und abdominal evozierte kortikale Reaktionen in Abhängigkeit von physikalsichen Reizparametern und der subjektiven Empfindungsstärke. Forschungsbericht aus dem Otto-Selz-Institut. Mannheim, Universität Mannheim: Nr. 45.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Dedicated to Professor György Ádám on the occasion of his 80th birthday.
Parts of this essay are based on a paper read before the research colloquium of the Institute of Psychology, University of Zurich, Switzerland, January 1999 (printed in Marx 1999).
Rights and permissions
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Möltner, A., Hölzl, R. Interoception, Body Perception and Awareness. BIOLOGIA FUTURA 53, 515–536 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1556/ABiol.53.2002.4.12
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/ABiol.53.2002.4.12