Abstract
Plant communities in extensive landscapes are often mapped remotely using detectable patterns based on vegetation structure and canopy species with a high relative cover. A plot-based classification which includes species with low relative canopy cover and ignores vegetation structure, may result in plant communities not easily reconcilable with the landscape patterns represented in mapping. In our study, we investigate the effects on classification outcomes if we (1) remove rare species based on canopy cover, and (2) incorporate vegetation structure by weighting species’ cover by different measures of vegetation height. Using a dataset of 101 plots of savanna vegetation in north-eastern Australia we investigated first, the effect of removing rare species using four cover thresholds (1, 5, 8 and 10% contribution to total cover) and second, weighting species by four height measures including actual height as well as continuous and categorical transformations. Using agglomerative hierarchical clustering we produced a classification for each dataset and compared them for differences in: patterns of plot similarity, clustering, species richness and evenness, and characteristic species. We estimated the ability of each classification to predict species cover using generalised linear models. We found removing rare species at any cover threshold produced characteristic species appearing to correspond to landscape scale changes and better predicted species cover in grasslands and shrublands. However, in woodlands it made no difference. Using actual height of vegetation layer maintained vegetation structure, emphasised canopy and then sub-canopy species in clustering, and predicted species cover best of the height-measures tested. Thus, removing rare species and weighting species by height are useful techniques for identifying plant communities from plot-based classifications which are conceptually consistent with those in landscape scale mapping. This increases the confidence of end-users in both the classifications and the maps, thus enhancing their use in land management decisions.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Abbreviations
- ALL:
-
dataset consisting of the full species pool
- C>1:
-
dataset with species contributing >1% to TFC included
- C>5:
-
dataset with species contributing >5%
- C>8:
-
dataset with species contributing >8%
- C>10:
-
dataset with species contributing >10% to TFC included
- IS:
-
Indicator Species
- ISA:
-
Indicator Species Analysis
- TFC:
-
Total Foliage Cover
References
Accad, A., V.J. Neldner, J.A.R. Kelley and J. Li. 2017. Remnant Regional Ecosystem Vegetation in Queensland, Analysis 1997–2015. [web page]. Queensland Department of Science, Information Technology and Innovation, Brisbane. http://www.qld.gov.au/environment/plants-animals/plants/herbarium/publi-cations, accessed 01/03/2017
Aho, K., D.W. Roberts and T. Weaver. 2008. Using geometric and non-geometric internal evaluators to compare eight vegetation classification methods. J. Veg. Sci. 19:549–562.
Anderson, M.J., T.O. Crist, J.M. Chase, M. Vellend, B.D. Inouye, A.L. Freestone, N.J. Sanders, H.V. Cornell, L.S. Comita, K.F. Davies, S.P. Harrison, N.J.B. Kraft, J.C. Stegen and N.G. Swenson. 2011. Navigating the multiple meanings of β diversity: a roadmap for the practicing ecologist. Ecology Letters 14:19–28.
Bedward, M., D.A. Keith and R.L. Pressey. 1992. Homogeneity analysis: Assessing the utility of classifications and maps of natural resources. Austr. J. Ecol. 17:133–139.
Clarke, K.R. and R.N. Gorley. 2006. PRIMER v6: User Manual/ Tutorial. PRIMER-E, Plymouth.
Clarke, K.R., R.N. Gorley, P.J. Somerfield and R.M. Warwick. 2014. Change in Marine Communities: An Approach to Statistical Analysis and Interpretation. PRIMER-E Ltd., Plymouth, UK.
Clarke, K.R., P.J. Somerfield and R.N. Gorley. 2008. Testing of null hypotheses in exploratory community analyses: similarity profiles and biota-environment linkage. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 366:56–69.
De Cáceres, M., P. Legendre, F. He and D. Faith. 2013. Dissimilarity measurements and the size structure of ecological communities. Meth. Ecol. Evol. 4:1167–1177.
De Cáceres, M.D., M. Chytrý, E. Agrillo, F. Attorre, Z. Botta-Dukát, J. Capelo, B. Czúcz, J. Dengler, J. Ewald, D. Faber-Langendoen, E. Feoli, S.B. Franklin, R. Gavilán, F. Gillet, F. Jansen, B. Jiménez-Alfaro, P. Krestov, F. Landucci, A. Lengyel, J. Loidi, L. Mucina, R.K. Peet, D.W. Roberts, J. Roleček, J.H.J. Schaminée, S. Schmidtlein, J.P. Theurillat, L. Tichý, D.A. Walker, O. Wildi, W. Willner and S.K. Wiser. 2015. A comparative framework for broad-scale plot-based vegetation classification. Appl. Veg. Sci. 18:543–560.
Dufrêne, M. and P. Legendre. 1997. Species assemblages and indicator species: The need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecol. Monog. 67:345–366.
ESCAVI. 2003. Australian Vegetation Attribute Manual: National Vegetation Information System, Version 6.0. Executive Steering Committee for Australian Vegetation Information, Department of the Environment and Heritage, Canberra.
Field, J.G., K.R. Clarke and R.M. Warwick. 1982. A practical strategy for analysing multispecies distribution patterns. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 8:37–52.
Franklin, J. 2013. Mapping vegetation from landscape to regional scales. In: E. van der Maarel and J. Franklin (eds), Vegetation Ecology. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., West Sussex, UK.
Gillison, A.N. 2012. Circumboreal gradients in plant species and functional types. Botanica Pacifica 1:97–107.
Grime, J.P. 1998. Benefits of plant diversity to ecosystems: immediate, filter and founder effects. J. Ecol. 86:902–910.
Hall, G.M.J. 1992. PC-RECCE: vegetation inventory data analysis. Forest Research Institute, Christchurch, N.Z.
Hnatiuk, R.J., R. Thackway and J. Walker. 2009. Vegetation. In: Australian Soil and Land Survey Field Handbook. National Committee on Soil and Terrain. CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne.
Horn, A.M. 1995. Surface Water Resources of Cape York Peninsula. Cape York Peninsula Land Use Strategy. Office of the Coordinator General of Queensland, Brisbane; Department of Environment, Sport and Territories, Canberra; Queensland Department of Primary Industries, Brisbane.
Kent, M. 2012. Vegetation Description and Data Analysis: A Practical Approach. 2nd ed. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford.
Knollova, I., M. Chytrý, L. Tichý and O. Hajek. 2005. Stratified resampling of phytosociological databases: some strategies for obtaining more representative data sets for classification studies. J. Veg. Sci. 16:479–486.
Küchler, A.W. and I.S. Zonneveld. 1988. Vegetation Mapping. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht.
Leathwick, J.R., S.W. Wallace and D.S. Williams. 1988. Vegetation of the Pureora Mountain ecological area West Taupo, New Zealand. New Zealand J. Bot. 26:259–280.
Lengyel, A., J. Csiky and Z. Botta-Dukát. 2012. How do locally infrequent species influence numerical classification? A simulation study. Community Ecol. 13:64–71.
Lengyel, A. and J. Podani. 2015. Assessing the relative importance of methodological decisions in classifications of vegetation data. J. Veg. Sci. 26:804–815.
Lindenmayer, D. and J.F. Franklin. 2002. Conserving Forest Biodiversity: A Comprehensive Multiscaled Approach. Island Press, Washington, D.C.
Lotter, M.C., L. Mucina and E.T.F. Witkowski. 2013. The classification conundrum: species fidelity as leading criterion in search of a rigorous method to classify a complex forest data set. Community Ecol. 14:121–132.
Lyons, M. 2018. Optimus: Model based diagnostics for multivariate cluster analysis, R package version 0.2.0. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=optimus
Lyons, M.B., D.A. Keith, D.I. Warton, M. Somerville and R.T. Kingsford. 2016. Model-based assessment of ecological community classifications. J. Veg. Sci. 27:704–715.
Margules, C.R. and R.L. Pressey. 2000. Systematic conservation planning. Nature 405:243–253.
Marignani, M., E. Del Vico and S. Maccherini. 2008. Performance of indicators and the effect of grain size in the discrimination of plant communities for restoration purposes. Community Ecol. 9:201–206.
Mariotte, P. 2014. Do subordinate species punch above their weight? Evidence from above- and below-ground. New Phytol. 203:16–21.
McCune, B. and J.B. Grace. 2002. Analysis of Ecological Communities. MjM Software Design, Oregon, USA.
Miller, B.P. and B.P. Murphy. 2017. Fire and Australian vegetation. In: D. Keith (eds), Australian Vegetation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. pp. 113–134.
Mucina, L. and G. Daniel. 2013. Vegetation Mapping in the Northern Kimberley, Western Australia. Curtin University, Perth, WA.
Mucina, L., H.J.S. Joop and J.S. Rodwell. 2000. Common data standards for recording relevés in field survey for vegetation classification. J. Veg. Sci. 11:769–772.
Mucina, L. and L. Tichý. 2018. Forest classification: Data-analytical experiments on vertical forest layering and flattened data. In: L. Mucina (ed), Vegetation Survey and Classification of Subtropical Forests of Southern Africa. Springer International Publishing AG, Cham, Switzerland.
Murtaugh, P.A. 2014. In defense of P values. Ecology 95:611–617.
Neldner, V.J. and D.W. Butler. 2008. Is 500 square metres an effective plot size to sample florisitic diversity for Queensland’s vegetation? Cunninghamia 10:513–519.
Neldner, V.J. and J.R. Clarkson. 1995. Vegetation Survey and Mapping of Cape York Peninsula. Cape York Peninsula Land Use Strategy. Office of the Co-ordinator General of Queensland, Brisbane; Department of Environment, Sport and Territories, Canberra; Queensland Department of Primary Industries, Brisbane.
Neldner, V.J. and C.J. Howitt. 1991. Comparision of an intuitive mapping classification and numerical classifications of vegetation in South-East Queensland, Australia. Vegetatio 94:141.
Neldner, V.J., B.A. Wilson, H.A. Dilleward, T.S. Ryan and D.W. Butler. 2017. Methodology for Survey and Mapping of Regional Ecosystems and Vegetation Communities in Queensland. version 4. Queensland Herbarium, Queensland Department of Science, Information Technology and Innovation, Brisbane. http://pub-lications.qld.gov.au/dataset/redd/resource/6dee78ab-c12c-4692-9842-b7257c2511e4, accessed 1st June 2017.
Nezerkova-Hejcmanova, P., M. Hejcman, A.A. Camara, M. Antoninova, V. Pavlu, T. Cerny and A.T. Ba. 2006. Analysis of the herbaceous undergrowth of the woody savanna in the Fathala Reserve, Delta du Saloum National Park (Senegal). Belg. J. Bot. 138:119–128.
Oliver, I., E.A. Broese, M.L. Dillon, D. Sivertsen and M.J. McNellie. 2012. Semi-automated assignment of vegetation survey plots within an a priori classification of vegetation types. Meth. Ecol. Evol. 4:73–81.
Pedrotti, F. 2013. Plant and Vegetation Mapping. Springer, New York.
Pos, E., J.E.g., Andino, D. Sabatier, J.F. Molino, N. Pitman, H. Mogollon, D. Neill, C. Ceron, G. Rivas, A. Di Fiore, R. Thomas, M. Tirado, K.R. Young, O. Wang, R. Sierra, R. Garcia-Villacorta, R. Zagt, W. Palacios, M. Aulestia and H. ter Steege. 2014. Are all species necessary to reveal ecologically important patterns? Ecol. Evol. 4:4626–4636.
Roberts, D.W. 2013. labdsv: Ordination and Multivariate Analysis for Ecology. R package version 1.6-1. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=labdsv
Roberts, D.W. 2015. Vegetation classification by two new iterative reallocation optimization algorithms. Plant Ecol. 216:741–758.
Roff, A., M. Lyons, H. Jones and J. Thonell. 2016. Reliability of map accuracy assessments: A comment on Hunter et al. (2016). Ecol. Manage. Restor. 17:124–127.
Sattler, P.S. and R.D. Williams. 1999. The Conservation Status of Queensland’s Bioregional Ecosystems. Environmental Protection Agency, Brisbane.
Specht, R.L. 1981. Foliage projective cover and standing biomass. In: Workshop proceedings: Vegetation classification in Australia. CSIRO in association with Australian National University Press.
R Development Core Team. 2014. The R project for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria. www.r-project.org/.
Tichý, L., M. Chytrý, M. Hajek, S.S. Talbot and Z. Botta-Dukat. 2010. OptimClass: Using species-to-cluster fidelity to determine the optimal partition in classification of ecological communities. J. Veg. Sci. 21:287–299.
Vellend, M., P.L. Lilley and B.M. Starzomski. 2008. Using subsets of species in biodiversity surveys. J. Appl. Ecol. 45:161–169.
Wyse, S.V., B.R. Burns and S.D. Wright. 2014. Distinctive vegetation communities are associated with the long-lived conifer Agathis australis (New Zealand kauri, Araucariaceae) in New Zealand rainforests. Austral Ecol. 39:388–400.
Acknowledgements
This work was carried with the support of the Queensland Herbarium, Department of Environment and Science, Queensland Government, Australia. We thank P. Craven, D. Crayn, L. Mitchell and M. Newton for discussions and comments, P. Bannink for Fig. 1 and the 14 members of the expert panel for providing thresholds of rarity and rank heights to test. We also thank anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on earlier drafts.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
42974_2018_19010067_MOESM1_ESM.pdf
When rare species are not important: linking plot-based vegetation classifications and landscape-scale mapping in Australian savanna vegetation
Rights and permissions
Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited, you give a link to the Creative Commons License, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Addicott, E., Laurance, S., Lyons, M. et al. When rare species are not important: linking plot-based vegetation classifications and landscape-scale mapping in Australian savanna vegetation. COMMUNITY ECOLOGY 19, 67–76 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1556/168.2018.19.1.7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/168.2018.19.1.7