Abstract
We studied spatial changes in species composition (i.e., beta diversity) of local assemblages of birds along ∼450 km of the Middle Paraná River, an extensive fluvial system of South America. Point counts were used to survey birds at 60 plots located in shrub swamps and marshes of the floodplain within four sites (15 plots per site). Two sites were surrounded by each of the two upland ecoregions. Beta diversity of bird assemblages was high and was more important than alpha diversity in shaping regional diversity (i.e., gamma diversity) of the fluvial system. Compositional changes were related to species turnover among plots, while nestedness dissimilarity was not important for shaping diversity patterns. Variation-partitioning analysis showed that local conditions (i.e., landscape composition within a radius of 200 m from the center of each plot) accounted for more spatial variation in assemblage composition than did location along the fluvial system. Adjacent upland ecoregions did not account for spatial changes in bird composition within the fluvial system. In conclusion, environmental heterogeneity created by flood pulses is an important factor for sustaining regional diversity of birds within the fluvial system through effects on beta diversity.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Abbreviations
- RDA:
-
Redundancy Analysis ordination
- PERMANOVA:
-
Permutational Multivariate Analysis of Variance
References
Amori, G., S. Gippoliti, L. Luiselli and C. Battisti. 2010. Are there latitudinal gradients in taxa turnover? A worldwide study with Sciuridae (Mammalia: Rodentia). Community Ecol. 11: 22–26.
Baselga, A. 2010. Partitioning the turnover and nestedness components of beta diversity. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 19: 134–143.
Baselga A. and C.D. Orme. 2012. Betapart: an R package for the study of beta diversity. Methods Ecol. Evol. 3: 808–812
Belmaker, J. and W. Jetz. 2012. Regional pools and environmental controls of Vertebrate richness. Am. Nat. 179: 512–523.
Borcard, D., P. Legendre and P. Drapeau. 1992. Partialling out the spatial component of ecological variation. Ecology 73: 1045–1055.
Brawn, J.D., S.K. Robinson and F.R. Thompson III. 2001. The role of disturbance in the ecology and conservation of birds. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 32: 251–276.
Cabrera A.L. 1994. Regiones fitogeográficas argentinas. ACME, Buenos Aires.
Cáceres, L.M. 1980. Caracterización climática de la Provincia de Santa Fe. Ministerio de Agricultura y Ganadería, Santa Fe.
Chao, A., C. Chiu and T.C. Hsieh. 2012. Proposing a resolution to debates on diversity partitioning. Ecology 93: 2037–2051.
Chase, J.M. and J.A. Myers. 2011. Disentangling the importance of ecological niches from stochastic processes across scales. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 366: 2351–2363.
Crist, T.O., J.A. Veech, J.C. Gering and K.S. Summerville. 2003. Partitioning species diversity across landscapes and regions: a hierarchical analysis of α, β and γ diversity. Am. Nat. 162: 734–743.
Da Silva, J.M. 1996. Distribution of Amazonian and Atlantic birds in gallery forests of the Cerrado Region, South America. Ornitol. Neotrop. 7: 1–18.
Demars, B.O.L. and D.M. Harper. 2005. Distribution of aquatic vascular plants in lowland rivers: separating the effects of local environmental conditions, longitudinal connectivity and river basin isolation. Freshwater Biol. 50: 418–437.
Dobkin, D.S. and Rich, A.C. 1998. Comparison of line-transect, spot map, and point-count surveys for birds in riparian habitats of the Great Basin. J. Field Ornithol. 69: 430–443.
Godinho, C., J. Rabaça and P. Segurado. 2010. Breeding bird assemblages in riparian galleries of the Guadiana River basin (Portugal): the effect of spatial structure and habitat variables. Ecol. Res. 25: 283–294.
Gregory, R.D., D.W. Gibbons and P.F. Donald. 2004. Bird census and survey techniques. In W.J. Sutherland, I. Newton and R.E. Green (eds.), Bird Ecology and Conservation: A Handbook of Techniques. Oxford University Press, Oxford. pp. 17–39.
Gu, W. and R.K. Swihart. 2004. Absent or undetected? Effects of non-detection of species occurrence on wildlife-habitat models. Biol. Conserv. 116: 195–203.
Guadagnin, D.L., A.S. Peter, L.F. Carvalho-Perello and L. Maltchik. 2005. Spatial and temporal patterns of waterbird assemblages in fragmented wetlands of Southern Brazil. Waterbirds 28: 261–404.
Heino, J., T. Muotka, R. Paavola, H. Hämäläinen and E. Koskenniemi. 2002. Correspondence between regional delineations and spatial patterns in macroinvertebrate assemblages of boreal headwater streams. J. North Am. Benthological Soc. 21: 397–413.
Henden J-A., N.G. Yoccoz, R.A. Ims and K. Langeland. 2013. How spatial variation in areal extent and configuration of labile vegetation states affect the riparian bird community in Arctic Tundra. PLoS ONE 8:63312
Iriondo, M.H., J.C. Paggi and M.J. Parma. 2007. The Middle Paraná River: limnology of a subtropical wetland. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
Kilpatrick, A.M., W.A. Mitchell, W.P. Porter and D.J. Currie. 2006. Testing a mechanistic explanation for the latitudinal gradient in mammalian species richness across North America. Evol. Ecol. Res. 8: 333–344.
Kindt, R. and R. Coe. 2005. Tree diversity analysis. A manual and software for common statistical methods for ecological and biodiversity studies. World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF), Nairobi. ISBN 92-9059-179-X.
Lande, R. 1996. Statistics and partitioning of species diversity, and similarity among multiple communities. Oikos 76: 5–13.
Legendre, P., D. Borcard and P.R. Peres-Neto. 2005. Analyzing beta diversity: partitioning the spatial variation of community composition data. Ecol. Monogr. 75: 435–450.
Legendre, P. and L. Legendre. 1998. Numerical Ecology. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
Lessard, J-P., M.K. Borregaard, J.A. Fordyce, C. Rahbek, M.D. Weiser, R.R. Dunn and N.J. Sanders. 2011. Strong influence of regional species pools on continent-wide structuring of local communities. Proc. R. Soc. B 279: 266–274.
Ma, Z., X. Gan, C. Choi, K. Jing, S. Tang, B. Li and J. Chen. 2007. Wintering bird communities in newly-formed wetland in the Yangtze River estuary. Ecol. Res. 22: 115–124.
Miller, J.R., M.D. Dixon and M.G. Turner. 2004. Response of avian communities in large-river floodplains to environmental variation at multiple scales. Ecol. Appl. 1394–1410.
Naiman, R.J., H. Décamps and M.E. McClain. 2005. Riparia: Ecology, Conservation and Management of Streamside Communities. Elsevier/Academic Press, San Diego.
Nestler, J.M., C.R.M. Baigún, N. Oldani and L.J. Weber. 2007. Contrasting the Middle Paraná and Mississippi Rivers to develop a template for restoring large floodplain river ecosystems. Int. J. River Basin Management 5: 305–319.
Nores, M, M.M. Cerana and D.A. Serra. 2005. Dispersal of forest birds and trees along the Uruguay River in southern South America. Divers. Distrib. 11: 205–217.
Oksanen, J. 2011. Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Communities in R: vegan tutorial. URL: http://cran.r-project.org.
Olson, D.M., E. Dinerstein, E.D. Wikramanayake, N.D. Burgess, G.V.N. Powell, E.C. Underwood, J.A. D´Amico, I. Itoua, H.E. Strand, J.C. Morrison, C.J. Loucks, T.F. Allnut, T.H. Ricketts, Y. Kura, J.F. Lamoreux, W.W. Wettengel, P. Hedao and K.R. Kassem. 2001. Terrestrial ecoregions of the world: a new map of life on Earth. BioScience 51: 933–938.
Peres-Neto, P.R., Legendre, P., Dray, S. and D. Borcard. 2006. Variation partitioning of species data matrices: estimation and comparison of fractions. Ecology 87: 2614–2625.
Perry, R.W., T.B. Wigley, M.A. Melchiors, R.E. Thill, P.A. Tappe and D.A. Miller. 2011. Width of riparian buffer and structure of adjacent plantations influence occupancy of conservation priority birds. Biodivers. Conserv. 20: 625–642.
R Core Team. 2015. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing Version 3.2.0. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. Available at: http://www.r-project.org.
Ralph, C. J., G. R. Geupel, P. Pyle, T. E. Martin, and D. F. DeSante. 1993. Handbook of field methods for monitoring landbirds. General Technical Report PSW-GTR-149. Pacific Southwest Research Station, Albany, California, USA.
Remsen, J.V.J., C.D. Cadena, A. Jaramillo, M. Nores, J.F. Pacheco, M.B. Robbins, T.S. Schulenberg, F.G. Stiles, D.F. Stotz and K.J. Zimmer. 2015. A classification of the bird species of South America. American Ornithologists’ Union. Available at: http://www.museum.lsu.edu/~Remsen/SACCBaseline.htm.
Renöfält, B.M., C. Nilsson and R. Jansson. 2005. Spatial and temporal patterns of species richness in a riparian landscape. J. Biogeogr. 32: 2025–2037.
Ricklefs, R.E. 1987. Community diversity: relative roles of local and regional processes. Science 235: 168–171.
Riffell, S.K., B.E. Keas and T.M. Burton. 2001. Area and habitat relationships of birds in great lakes coastal wet meadows. Wetlands 21: 492–507.
Robbins, C.S. 1981. Effect of time of day on bird activity. Stud. Avian Biol. 6: 275–286.
Rojas, A. and J.H. Saluso. 1987. Informe Climático de la Provincia de Entre Ríos. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria, Paraná.
Ronchi-Virgolini, A.L., A.H. Beltzer and A. Manzano. 2008. Bird communities in wetlands along the Lower Paraná River, Entre Ríos, Argentina. Avian Biol. Res. 1: 153–163.
Sabattini, R.A. and V.H. Lallana. 2007. Aquatic macrophytes. In M.H. Iriondo, J.C. Paggi and M.J. Parma (eds.), The Middle Paraná River: Limnology of a Subtropical Wetland. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. pp. 341–362.
Savard, J.-P. L. and Hooper, T. D. 1995. Influence of survey length and radius size on grassland bird surveys by point counts at Williams Lake, British Columbia. In: Ralph, C. J., Sauer, J. R. and Droege, S. (eds), Monitoring Bird Populations by Point Counts. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR- 149. Pacifie Southwest Research Station, Forest Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture, Albany, CA, pp. 57–62.
Soininen, J., R. McDonald and H. Hillebrand. 2007. The distance decay of similarity in ecological communities. Ecography 30: 3–12.
Sullivan, S.M.P., M.C. Watzin and W.S. Keeton. 2007. A riverscape perspective on habitat associations among riverine bird assemblages in the Lake Champlain Basin, USA. Landsc. Ecol. 22: 1169–1186.
Titeux, N., M. Dufrene, J-P. Jacob, M. Paquay and P. Defourny. 2004. Multivariate analysis of a fine-scale breeding bird atlas using a geographical information system and partial canonical correspondence analysis: environmental and spatial effects. J. Biogeogr. 31: 1841–1856.
Tockner, K., M.S. Lorang and J.A. Stanford. 2010. River flood plains are model ecosystems to test general hydrogeomorphic and ecological concepts. River Res. Appl. 26: 76–86.
Verner, J. and K.A. Milne. 1989. Coping with sources of variability when monitoring population trends. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 26: 191–199.
Ward, J.V., K. Tockner and F. Schiemer. 1999. Biodiversity of flood-plain river ecosystems: ecotones and connectivity. Regul. Rivers: Res. Mgmt. 15: 125–139.
White, E.P. and A.H. Hurlbert. 2010. The combined influence of the local environmental and regional enrichment on bird species richness. Am. Nat. 175: 35–43.
White, E.P., S.K. Ernest, P.B. Adler, A.H. Hurlbert and S.K. Lyons. 2010. Integrating spatial and temporal approaches to understanding species richness. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 365: 3633–3643.
Whittaker, R.H. 1960. Vegetation of the Siskiyou Mountains, Oregon and California. Ecol. Monogr. 30: 279–338.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Lorenzón, R.E., Beltzer, A.H., Peltzer, P.M. et al. Local conditions vs regional context: variation in composition of bird communities along the Middle Paraná River, an extensive river-floodplain system of South America. COMMUNITY ECOLOGY 17, 40–47 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1556/168.2016.17.1.6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/168.2016.17.1.6
Keywords
- Beta diversity
- Nestedness
- Riparian corridor
- Spatial structure
- Species turnover
- Variation-partitioning
- Wetlands