Skip to main content
Log in

Determining the Best Drought Tolerance Indices using Artificial Neural Network (ANN): Insight into Application of Intelligent Agriculture in Agronomy and Plant breeding

  • Breeding
  • Published:
Cereal Research Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the present study, efficiency of the artificial neural network (ANN) method to identify the best drought tolerance indices was investigated. For this purpose, 25 durum genotypes were evaluated under rainfed and supplemental irrigation environments during two consecutive cropping seasons (2011–2013). The results of combined analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed that year, environment, genotype and their interaction effects were significant for grain yield. Mean grain yield of the genotypes ranged from 184.93 g plot–1 under rainfed environment to 659.32 g plot–1 under irrigated environment. Based on the ANN results, yield stability index (YSI), harmonic mean (HM) and stress susceptible index (SSI) were identified as the best indices to predict drought-tolerant genotypes. However, mean productivity (MP) followed by geometric mean productivity (GMP) and HM were found to be accurate indices for screening drought tolerant genotypes. In general, our results indicated that genotypes G9, G12, G21, G23 and G24 were identified as more desirable genotypes for cultivation in drought-prone environments. Importantly, these results could provide an evidence that ANN method can play an important role in the selection of drought tolerant genotypes and also could be useful in other biological contexts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bagheri, S., Gheysari, M., Ayoubi, S., Lavaee, N. 2012. Silage maize yield prediction using artificial neural networks. Int. J. Plant Prod. 19:77–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bahrami, F., Arzani, A., Karimi, V. 2014. Evaluation of yield-based drought tolerance indices for screening safflower genotypes. Agron. J. 106:1219–1224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouslama, M., Schapaugh, W.T. 1984. Stress tolerance in soybean: 1. Evaluation of three screening techniques for heat and drought tolerance. Crop Sci. 24:933–937.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebrahimi, M., Ebrahimie, E. 2010. Sequence-based prediction of enzyme thermostability through bioinformatics algorithms. Curr. Bioinform. 5:195–203.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Farshadfar, E., Sutka, J. 2002. Multivariate analysis of drought tolerance in wheat substitution lines. Cereal. Res. Commun. 31:33–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez, G.C.J. 1993. Effective selection criteria for assessing plant stress tolerance. In: Kuo, C.G. (ed), Proceeding of the AFCTWS Adaptation of food crops to temperature and water stress; Shanhua, Taiwan, pp. 257–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, R.A., Maurer, R. 1978. Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars: 1. Grain yield response. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 29:897–912.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Food and Agriculture Organization, FAO. 2013. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/

  • Gavuzzi, P., Rizza, F., Palumbo, M., Campaline, R.G., Ricciardi, F.L., Borghi, G. 1997. Evaluation of field and laboratory predictors of drought and heat tolerance in winter cereals. Plant Sci. 77:523–531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gholipoor, M., Rohani, A., Torani, S. 2012. Optimization of traits to increasing barley grain yield using an artificial neural network. Int. J. Plant. Prod. 7:1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao, H.W., Tasi, M.S., Wang, S.C. 2006. Spatial data mining of colocation patterns for decision support in agriculture. Asian Journal of Health and Info. Sci. 1:61–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khalili, M., Naghavi, M.R., Pour-Aboughadareh, A.R., Talebzadeh, S.J. 2012. Evaluating of drought stress tolerance based on selection indices in spring canola cultivars (Brassica napus L.). J. Agric. Sci. 4:78–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khalili, M., Pour-Aboughadareh, A., Naghavi, M.R., Mohammad-Amini, E. 2014. Evaluation of drought tolerance in safflower genotypes based on drought tolerance indices. Not. Bot. Horti. Agrobot. Cluj-Napoca. 42:214–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khashei, M., Bijari, M. 2010. An artificial neural network (p, d, q) model for time series forecasting. Expert. Syst. Appl. 37:479–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loss, S.P., Siddique, K.H.M. 1994. Morphological and physiological traits associated with wheat yield increases in Mediterranean environments. Adv. Agron. 52:229–276.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mohammadi, R. 2016. Efficiency of yield-based drought tolerance indices to identify tolerant genotypes in durum wheat. Euphytica 211:71–89.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moosavi, S.S., Yazdi-Samadi, B., Naghavi, M.R., Zali, A.A., Dashti, H., Pourshahbazi, A. 2008. Introduction of new indices to identify relative drought tolerance and resistance in wheat genotypes. Desert. 12:165–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naghavi, M.R., Pour-Aboughadareh, A.R., Khalili, M. 2013. Evaluation of drought tolerance indices for screening some of corn (Zea mays L.) cultivars under environmental conditions. Not. Sci. Biol. 5:388–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pour-Siahbidi, M.M., Pour-Aboughadareh, A. 2013. Evaluation of grain yield and repeatability of drought tolerance indices for screening chickpea (Ciceraritinum L.) genotypes under rainfed conditions. Iranian J. Genetics. Plant. Breed. 2:28–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravari, S.Z., Dehghani, H., Naghavi, H. 2015. Assessment of salinity indices to identify Iranian wheat varieties using an artificial neural network. Ann. Appl. Biol. 168:185–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robert, N. 2002. Comparison of stability statistics for yield and quality traits in bread wheat. Euphytica. 128:333–341.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rosielle, A.A., Hamblin, J. 1981. Theoretical aspects of selection for yield in stress and non-stress environment. Crop. Sci. 21:943–946.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Safa, M., Samarasinghe, S., Nejat, M. 2015. Prediction of wheat production using artificial neural networks and investigating factors affecting it: case study in Canterbury province, New Zealand. J. Agr. Sci. Tech. 17:791–803.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shekoofa, A., Emam, Y., Shekoufa, N., Ebrahimi, M., Ebrahimie, E. 2014. Determining the most important physiological and agronomic traits contributing to maize grain yield through machine learning algorithms: A new avenue in intelligent agriculture. Plos One. 9:e97288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi, C., Dong, B., Qiao, Y., Guan, X., Si, F., Zheng, X., Liu, M. 2014. Physiological and morphological basis of improved water-use-efficiency in wheat from partial root-zone drying. Crop Sci. 54:2745–2751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tahmasbi, G., Heydarnezhadian, J., Pour-Aboughadareh, A. 2013. Evaluation of yield and yield components in some of promising wheat lines. Intl. J. Agri. Crop Sci. 20:2379–2384.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Etminan.

Additional information

Communicated by S. Gottwald

Electronic supplementary material

42976_2019_4701170_MOESM1_ESM.pdf

Determining the Best Drought Tolerance Indices using Artificial Neural Network (ANN): Insight into Application of Intelligent Agriculture in Agronomy and Plant breeding

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Etminan, A., Pour-Aboughadareh, A., Mohammadi, R. et al. Determining the Best Drought Tolerance Indices using Artificial Neural Network (ANN): Insight into Application of Intelligent Agriculture in Agronomy and Plant breeding. CEREAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS 47, 170–181 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1556/0806.46.2018.057

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/0806.46.2018.057

Keywords

Navigation