It is increasingly understood that inventorying and monitoring biodiversity requires a multi-taxon approach and that comparing simple indices, such as species richness, should be accompanied by deeper analyses of species community composition and by comparisons of species life-history traits among taxa and habitats. Here, we document that two ecologically rather similar groups of epigeic predators, ground-dwelling spiders (Araneae) and ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae), differ in patterns of stone quarry colonization. Such post-industrial barrens as abandoned quarries are increasingly appreciated as potential refuges for species that are becoming rare in modern landscapes. We compared species richness, community composition and species life-history traits of two epigeic invertebrates groups, in quarries and adjoining seminatural biotopes in a submountain region with granulite and limestone bedrock in SW Czech Republic. For both groups, quarries were species-poorer than seminatural sites, herbaceous biotopes were richer than scrubby and rocky biotopes, and no significant effects on species richness were revealed for substrate. Assemblages colonising quarries differed from those outside of quarries. They contained numerous regionally rarer species of rocks and scree in the case of spiders, but generalists of open landscapes prevailed among ground beetles. A survey limited to ground beetles, as well as to species richness analyses, would fail to detect a conservation potential of the quarries. Hence, a multi-taxa approach should be preferred, and species richness analyses should be assembled by insights onto community composition and species life-history traits in monitoring studies.
Analysis of Variance
Canonical Correspondence Analysis
Detrended Correspondence Analysis.
Andersen, J. 2000. What is the origin of the carabid beetle fauna of dry, anthropogenic habitats in western Europe? J. Biogeogr. 27: 795–806.
Andersen, J. and O. Hanssen. 2005. Riparian beetles, a unique, but vulnerable element in the fauna of Fennoscandia. Biodiv. Conserv. 14: 3497–3524.
Balmer, O. and A. Erhardt. 2000. Consequences of succession on extensively grazed grasslands for central European butterfly communities: Rethinking conservation practices. Conserv. Biol. 14: 746–757.
Batáry, P., A. Báldi, G. Szél, A. Podlussany, I. Rozner and S. Erdos. 2007. Responses of grassland specialist and generalist beetles to management and landscape complexity. Divers. Distrib. 13: 196–202.
Bates, A.J., J.P. Sadler, J.N. Perry. and A.P. Fowles. 2007. The microspatial distribution of beetles (Coleoptera) on exposed riverine sediments (ERS). Eur. J. Entomol 104: 479–487.
Baur, B., C. Cremene, G. Groza, L. Rakosy, A.A. Schileyko, A. Baur, P. Stoll and A. Erhardt. 2006. Effects of abandonment of subalpine hay meadows on plant and invertebrate diversity in Transylvania, Romania. Biol. Conserv. 132: 261–273.
Benes, J., P. Kepka and M. Konvicka. 2003. Limestone quarries as refuges for European xerophilous butterflies. Conserv. Biol. 17: 1058–1069.
Brandle, M., W. Durka, H. Krug and R. Brandl. 2003. The assembly of local communities: Plants and birds in non-reclaimed mining sites. Ecography 26: 652–660.
Bried, J.T., B.D. Herman and G.N. Ervin. 2007. Umbrella potential of plants and dragonflies for wetland conservation: a quantitative case study using the umbrella index. J. App. Ecol. 44: 833–842.
Broring, U. and G. Wiegleb. 2005. Soil zoology II: Colonization, distribution, and abundance of terrestrial Heteroptera in open landscapes of former brown coal mining areas. Ecol. Eng. 24: 135–147.
Buchar, J. 1983. Artenklassifikation der Arachnofauna Bohmens als Mittel zur Bioindikation der Umweltqualitat Fauna Bohem. septentr. 8: 119–135.
Buchar, J. and V. Ruzicka. 2002. Catalogue of Spiders of the Czech Republic. Peres press, Prague.
Clarke, K.R. 1993. Nonparametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure. Aust. J. Ecol. 18: 117–143.
Cremene, C, G. Groza, L. Rakosy, A.A. Schileyko, A. Baur, A. Erhardt and B. Baur. 2005. Alterations of steppe-like grasslands in Eastern Europe: a threat to regional biodiversity hotspots. Conserv. Biol. 19: 1606–1618.
Devictor, V., R. Julliard and F. Jiguet. 2008. Distribution of specialist and generalist species along spatial gradients of habitat disturbance and fragmentation. Oikos 117: 507–514.
Dufrene, M. and P. Legendre. 1997. Species assemblages and indicator species: The need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecol. Monogr. 67: 345–366.
Edwards, J.S. and I.W.B Thornton. 2001 Colonization of an island volcano, Long Island, Papua New Guinea, and an emergent island, Motmot, in its caldera lake. VI. The pioneer arthropod community of Motmot. J. Biogeogr. 28: 1379–1388.
Fleishman, E., D.D Murphy and P.E Brussard. 2000. A new method for selection of umbrella species for conservation planning. Ecol. Appl. 10: 569–579.
Gotelli, N.J. and R.K. Colwell. 2001. Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecol. Lett. 4: 379–391.
Gutierrez, D., R. Menendez and M. Mendez. 2004. Habitat-based conservation priorities for carabid beetles within the Picos de Europa National Park, northern Spain. Biol. Conserv. 115: 379–393
Hammer, O., D.A.T. Harper and P.D. Ryan. 2001. PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica 4, ttp://palaeo-elec-tronica.org/2001_2001/past/issue2001_2001.htm.
Hodacova, D. and K. Prach. 2003. Spoil heaps from brown coal mining: Technical reclamation versus spontaneous revegetation. Restor. Ecol. 11: 385–391.
Hurka, K. 1996. Carabidae of the Czech and Slovak Republics. Kabourek, Zlin.
Hurka, K., P. Vesely and J. Farkac. 1996. Die Nutzung der Laufkafer (Coleoptera: Carabidae) zur Indikation der Umweltqualitat. Klapalekiana 32: 15–26.
Kadlec, T., J. Benes, V. Jarosik and M. Konvicka. 2008. Revisiting urban refuges: Changes of butterfly and burnet fauna in Prague reserves over three decades. Landsc. Urban Plann. 85: 1–11.
Kati, V., P. Devillers, M. Dufrene, A. Legakis, D. Voko and P. Lebrun. 2004. Testing the value of six taxonomic groups as biodiversity indicators at a local scale. Conserv. Biol. 18: 667–675.
Kotze, D.J. and R.B. O’Hara. 2003. Species decline – but why? Explanations of carabid beetle (Coleoptera, Carabidae) declines in Europe. Oecologia 135: 138–148.
Kremen, C. 1992. Assessing the indicator properties of species assemblages for natural areas monitoring. Ecol. Appl. 2: 203–217.
Kremen, C., R.K. Colwell, T.L. Erwin, D.D. Murphy, R.F. Noss and M.A. Sanjayan. 1993. Terrestrial arthropod assemblages – their use in conservation planning. Conserv. Biol. 7: 796–808.
Lambeck, R.J. 1997. A multi-species umbrella for nature conservation. Conserv. Biol. 11: 849–856.
Lawton, J.H., D.E. Bignell, B. Bolton,G.F. Bloemers, P. Eggleton, P.M. Hammond, M. Hodda, R.D. Holt, T.B. Larsen, N.A. Mawdsley, N.E. Stork, D.S. Srivastava and A.D. Watt. 1998. Biodiversity inventories, indicator taxa and effects of habitat modification in tropical forest. Nature 391: 72–76.
Lepš, J. and P. Šmilauer. 2003. Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data Using CANOCO. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Lovell, S, M. Hamer, R. Slotow and D. Herbert. 2007. Assessment of congruency across invertebrate taxa and taxonomic levels to identify potential surrogates. Biol. Conserv. 139: 113–125.
Marc, P, A. Canard and F. Ysnel. 1999. Spiders (Araneae) useful for pest limitation and bioindication. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 74: 229–273.
McGeoch, M.A. 1998. The selection, testing and application of terrestrial insects as bioindicators. Biol. Rev. 73: 181–201.
Niemela, J and B. Baur. 1998. Threatened species in a vanishing habitat: plants and invertebrates in calcareous grasslands in the Swiss Jura mountains. Biodiv. Conserv. 7: 1407–1416
Novak, J. and M. Konvicka. 2006. Proximity of valuable habitats affects succession patterns in abandoned quarries.Ecol. Eng.26: 113–122.
Owens, I.P.F., P.M. Bennett and P.H. Harvey. 1999. Species richness among birds: body size, life history, sexual selection orecology? Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B – Biol. Sci. 266: 933–939.
Pearson, D.L. 1994. Selecting indicator taxa for the quantitative assessment of biodiversity. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. B – Biol. Sci. 345: 75–79.
Prach, K. and P. Pysek. 2001. Using spontaneous succession for restoration of human-disturbed habitats: Experience from Central Europe. Ecol. Eng. 17: 55–62.
Rainio, J. and J. Niemela. 2003. Ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) as bioindicators. Biodiv. Conserv. 12: 487–506.
Ricketts, T.H., G.C. Daily and P.R. Ehrlich. 2002. Does butterfly diversity predict moth diversity? Testing a popular indicator taxon at local scales. Biol. Conserv. 103: 361–370.
Roberge, J.M. and P. Angelstam. 2004. Usefulness of the umbrella species concept as a conservation tool. Conserv. Biol. 18: 76–85.
Rosenzweig, M.L. 2003. Reconciliation ecology and the future of species diversity. Oryx 37: 194–205.
Roth, T., V. Amrhein, B. Peter and D. Weber. 2008. A Swiss agrienvironment scheme effectively enhances species richness for some taxa over time. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 125: 167–172.
Ruzicka, V. 2000. Spiders in rocky habitats in Central Bohemia. J. Arachnology 28: 217–222.
Samways, M.J. 2007. Insect conservation: A synthetic management approach. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 52: 465–487.
Sauberer, N., K.P. Zulka, M. Abensperg-Traun, H.M. Berg, G. Bieringer, N. Milasowszky, D. Moser, C. Plutzar, M. Pollheimer, C. Storch, R. Trostl, H. Zechmeister and G. Grabherr. 2004. Surrogate taxa for biodiversity in agricultural landscapes of eastern Austria. Biol. Conserv. 117: 181–190.
Schulz, F. and G. Wiegleb. 2000. Development options of natural habitats in a post-mining landscape. Land Degrad. Dev. 11: 99–110.
Simberloff, D. 1998. Flagships, umbrellas, and keystones: Is singlespecies management passe in the landscape era? Biol. Conserv. 83: 247–257.
Skoupy, V. 2004. Ground-beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) of the Czech and Slovak Republics of Jan Pulpan’s Collection. Public History, Prague.
Small, E., J.P. Sadler and M. Telfer. 2006. Do landscape factors affect brownfield carabid assemblages? Sci. Total Environ. 360: 205–222.
Spitzer, L., M. Konvicka, R. Tropek, J. Benes, I.H. Tuf and J. Tufova. 2008. Does closure of traditionally managed open woodlands threaten epigeic invertebrates? Effects of coppicing and high deer densities. Biol. Conserv. 141: 827–837.
StatSoft, Inc. 2001. STATISTICA (data analysis software system), version 6. www.statsoft.com.
ter Braak, C.J.F. and P. Smilauer. 2002. CANOCO reference manual and CanoDraw for Windows user’s guide: Software for canonical community ordination (version 4.5). Microcomputer Power, Ithaca, NY.
Thomas, J.A. 1993. Holocene climate changes and warm man-made refugia may explain why a sixth of British butterflies inhabit unnatural early-successional habitats. Ecography 16: 278–284.
Thomas, J.A., M.G. Telfer, D.B. Roy, CD. Preston, J.J.D. Greenwoo, J. Asher, R. Fox, R.T. Clarke and J.H. Lawton. 2004. Comparative losses of British butterflies, birds, and plants and the global extinction crisis. Science 303: 1879–1881.
Tropek, R. and M. Konvicka. 2008. Can quarries supplement rare xeric habitats in a piedmont region? Spiders of the Blansky les Mts., Czech Republic. Land Degrad. Dev. 19: 104–114.
Vessby, K., B. Soderstrom, A. Glimskarand B.Svensson. 2002. Species-richness correlations of six different taxa in Swedish seminatural grasslands. Conserv. Biol. 16: 430–439.
Weyman, G.S., K.D. Sunderland and P.C. Jepson. 2002. A review of the evolution and mechanisms of ballooning by spiders inhabiting arable farmland. Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 14: 307–326.
Wheater, C.P. and W.R. Cullen. 1997. The flora and invertebrate fauna of abandoned limestone quarries in Derbyshire. Restor. Ecol. 5: 77–84.
Wheater, C.P., W.R. Cullen and J.R. Bell. 2000. Spider communities as tools in monitoring reclaimed limestone quarry landforms. Landscape Ecol. 15: 401–406.
Wiegleb, G. and B. Felinks. 2001. Predictability of early stages of primary succession in post-mining landscapes of Lower Lusatia, Germany. Appl. Veg. Sci. 4: 5–18.
About this article
Cite this article
Tropek, R., Spitzer, L. & Konvicka, M. Two groups of epigeic arthropods differ in colonising of piedmont quarries: the necessity of multi-taxa and life-history traits approaches in the monitoring studies. COMMUNITY ECOLOGY 9, 177–184 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1556/ComEc.9.2008.2.6
- Monitoring studies
- Post-industrial habitats
- Hurka (1996) for ground beetles
- Buchar and Ruzicka (2002) for spiders