Community Ecology

, Volume 9, Issue 1, pp 53–58 | Cite as

The response of rare herbaceous plants to the removal of weeds in an unproductive environment

  • J. A. BrownEmail author
  • A. N. H. Smith
  • T. J. Robinson


We investigated the neighbourhood-scale effect of weeding on native plants in Lance McCaskill Nature Reserve, Canterbury, New Zealand. The reserve is an unproductive basin of limestone debris. Originally set up to protect the Castle Hill buttercup, Ranunculus crithmifolius var. paucifolius, the reserve also offers protection for nationally endangered species: Myosotis colensoi and Lepidium sisymbrioides. Our aim was to investigate whether removal of introduced plants increased the cover of remaining native species. We removed introduced plants, by hand, every year for 6 years from half of the plots. We used nonparametric multivariate analysis to compare overall species cover.

The results suggest that weeding does benefit the native plants in this area. There was a significant difference in the mean of the overall native species cover between the weeded and the non-weeded plots. For the ten species measured, the mean area covered per square metre was higher in the weeded plots than in the non-weeded plots in most years of the study. There was considerable variation in the data and we discuss possible reasons for this.


Bootstrap confidence intervals Non-parametric multivariate analysis Weeding 


New Zealand Plant Conservation Network ( 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anderson, M.J. 2001. A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral Ecology 26: 32–46.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, M.J. 2004. DISTLM: Distance-based multivariate analysis for a linear model. Department of Statistics, University of Auckland, New Zealand.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, M.J. and C.J.F. ter Braak. 2003. Permutation tests for multi-factorial analysis of variance. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 73: 85–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bray, J.R. and Curtis J.T. 1957. An ordination of the upland forest communities of southern Wisconsin. Ecological Monographs 27: 325–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gaston, K.J. and B.H. McArdle. 1994. The temporal variability of animal abundances: measures, methods and patterns. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 345: 335–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hurlbert, S.H. 1984. Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecological Monographs 54: 187–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Manly, B.F.J. 1997. Randomization, Bootstrap and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology, 2nd edition. Chapman and Hall, London.Google Scholar
  8. McArdle, B.H. and M.J. Anderson. 2001. Fitting multivariate models to community data: a comment on distance-based redundancy analysis. Ecology 82: 290–097.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. McCaskill, L.W. 1976. The Castle Hill buttercup. Tussock Grasslands and Mountain Lands Institute Review 3:55–58.Google Scholar
  10. McCaskill, L.W. 1980. The Castle Hill Nature Reserve management plan. Management Plan Series No. NR3, Unpublished report of the Department of Lands and Survey, Christchurch.Google Scholar
  11. McCaskill, L.W. 1982. The Castle Hill buttercup (Ranunculus pauciflora): A story of preservation. Special Publication No. 25, Tussock Grasslands and Mountain Lands Institute, Lincoln College, Canterbury.Google Scholar
  12. R Development Core Team. 2004. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. ( Scholar
  13. Wong, V. and G.J. Hickling. 1999. Assessment and management of hare impact on high-altitude vegetation. Science for Conservation 116, NZ Department of Conservation, Wellington.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest 2008

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. A. Brown
    • 1
    Email author
  • A. N. H. Smith
    • 2
  • T. J. Robinson
    • 3
  1. 1.Biomathematics Research Centre, Department of Mathematics and StatisticsUniversity of CanterburyChristchurchNew Zealand
  2. 2.National Institute of Water and Atmospheric ResearchWellingtonNew Zealand
  3. 3.Department of StatisticsUniversity of WyomingLaramieUSA

Personalised recommendations