Studies addressing the question of how communities develop reported contrasting temporal patterns of species associations during succession. Several hypotheses were formulated about succession, but a general explanation of community assembly is missing. We analysed trends of species associations during old-field succession in two contrasting habitats: the first with chernozemic brown forest soil and temperate climate, and the second with sand soil and dryer climate. Significant pair-wise associations were calculated across a range of spatial scales. Comparing the two succession seres, one under harsh and the other under favourable environment, we attempted to make generalisations about species relation patterns. We found no trend but fluctuation in the level of community organization during succession. None of the existing succession models explained our results about changes in spatial structure of grassland communities during succession. Fluctuation in the number of significant associations was more intense and took longer under less favourable environmental conditions. Our results suggest that the stressed habitat type posed stronger constraints on species coexistence during succession than the favourable habitat did, but validating this hypothesis needs further investigations.
Aarssen, L. W. and R. Turkington. 1985. Vegetation dynamics and neighbour associations in pasture-community evolution. J. Ecol. 73:585–603.
Armesto, J. J., S. T. A. Pickett and M. J. McDonnell. 1991. Spatial heterogeneity during succession: a cyclic model of invasion and exclusion. In: J. Kolasa and S. T. A. Pickett (eds.), Ecological Heterogeneity. Springer-Verlag, New York, Inc. pp. 256–269.
Bartha, S. and M. Kertész. 1998. The importance of neutral-models in detecting interspecific spatial associations from ‘trainsect’ data. Tiscia 31:85–98.
Bartha, S., S. T. A. Pickett and M. L. Cadenasso. 2000. Limitations to species coexistence in secondary succession. In: Proceedings IAVS Symposium. Opulus Press, IAVS, Uppsala. pp. 55–58.
Belyea, L. R. and J. Lancaster. 1999. Assembly rules within a contingent ecology. Oikos 86:402–416.
Booth, B. D. and C. J. Swanton. 2002. Assembly theory applied to weed communities. Weed Science 50:2–13.
Borhidi, A. 1993. Characteristics of the climate of the Danube-Tisza Mid-Region. In: J. Szujkó-Lacza and D. Kováts (eds.), The Flora of the Kiskunság National Park. Hungarian Natural History Museum. pp. 9–20.
Burke, I. C., W. K. Lauenroth, M. A.Vinton, P. B. Hook, R. H. Kelly, H. E. Epstein, M. R. Aguiar, M. D. Robles, M. O. Aguilera, K. L. Murphy and R. A. Gill. 1998. Plant-soil interactions in temperate grasslands. Biogeochemistry 42:121–143.
Csecserits, A. and T. Rédei. 2001. Secondary succession on sandy old-fields in Hungary. Appl. Veg. Sci. 4:63–74.
Dale, M. R. T., D. J. Blundon, D. A. MacIsaac and A. G. Thomas. 1991. Multiple species effects and spatial autocorrelation in detecting species associations. J. Veg. Sci. 2:635–642.
Diamond, J. M. 1975. Assembly of species communities. In: M. L. Cody and J. M. Diamond (eds.), Ecology and evolution of communities. Harvard University Press, Cambridge. pp. 342–444.
Gitay, H. and J. B. Wilson. 1995. Post-fire changes in community structure of tall tussock grasslands: a test of alternative models of succession. J. Ecol. 83:775–782.
Greig-Smith, P. 1952. Ecological observations on degraded and secondary forest in Trinidad, British West Indies. II. Structure of the communities. J. Ecol. 40:316–330.
Greig-Smith, P. 1983. Quantitative Plant Ecology, 3rd edition. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.
Hogeweg, P., B. Hesper, C. P. van Schaik and W. G. Beeftink. 1985. Patterns in vegetation succession, an ecomorphological study. In: J. White (ed.), The Population Structure of Vegetation. Dr W. Junk Publishers, Dordrecht. pp. 637–666.
Jakab, S. 1972. Observaþii pedogeografice i pedomorfologice în Cîmpia Transilvaniei (Pedogeographic and pedomorphogenetic observations in the Transylvanian Plain). Ştinþa Solului 10:55–69.
Kovács-Láng, E., Gy. Kröel-Dulay, M. Kertész, G. Fekete, S. Bartha, J. Mika, I. Dobi-Wantuch, T. Rédei, K. Rajkai and I. Hahn. 2000. Changes in the composition of sand grasslands along a climatic gradient in Hungary and implications for climate change. Phytocoenologia 30:385–407.
Kullback, S. 1959. Information Theory and Statistics. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
Kun, A., E. Ruprecht and A. Szabó. 2004. Az Erdélyi-medence bio-klimatológiai jellemzése (The bioclimatological characteristics of the Transylvanian Basin (Romania)). Múzeumi Füzetek 13:63–81.
Lawton, J. H. 1987. Are there assembly rules for successional communities? In: A. J. Gray, M. J. Crawley and P. J. Edwards (eds.), Colonization, Succession and Stability. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford. pp. 225–244.
Legendre, P. and L. Legendre. 1998. Numerical Ecology, 2nd English edition. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherland.
Lepš, J. and V. Buriánek 1990. Interspecific associations in old-field succession. In: F. Krahulec, A. D. Q. Agnew, S. Agnew and J. H. Willems (eds.), Spatial Processes in Plant Communities. SPB Academic Publisher, The Hague. pp. 31–47.
Lockwood, J. L. 1997. An alternative to succession: Assembly rules offer guide to restoration efforts. Restoration & Management Notes 15:45–50.
Margalef, R. 1963. On certain unifying principles in ecology. Am. Nat. 97:357–374.
Margalef, R. 1968. Perspectives in Ecological Theory. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois.
Myster, R. W. and S. T. A. Pickett. 1992. Dynamics of associations between plants in ten old fields during 31 years of succession. J. Ecol. 80:291–302.
O’Connor, I. and L. W. Aarssen. 1987. Species association patterns in abandoned sand quarries. Vegetatio 73:101–109.
Osbornová, J., M. Kováøová, J. Lepš and K. Prach (eds.). 1990. Succession in Abandoned Fields. Studies in Central Bohemia, Czechoslovakia. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
Palmer, M. W. and E. van der Maarel. 1995. Variance in species richness, species association, and niche limitation. Oikos 73:203–213.
Peet, R. K. 1992. Community structure and ecosystem function. In: D. C. Glenn-Levin, R. K. Peet and T. T. Veblen (eds.), Plant succession: Theory and Prediction. Chapman & Hall, London. pp. 103–151.
Pickett, S. T. A., M. L. Cadenasso and S. Bartha. 2001. Implications from the Buell-Small Succession Study for vegetation restoration. Appl. Veg. Sci. 4:41–52.
Podani, J. 1987. Computerized sampling in vegetation studies. Coenoses 2:9–18.
Podani, J.,T. Czárán and S. Bartha. 1993. Pattern, area and diversity: the importance of spatial scale in species assemblages. Abstracta Botanica 17:37–51.
Rice, W. R. 1989. Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43: 223–225.
Ruprecht, E. 2005. Secondary succession on old-fields in the Transylvanian Lowland (Romania). Preslia 77:145–157.
Temperton, V. M., R. J. Hobbs, T. Nuttle and S. Halle. 2004. Assembly Rules and Restoration Ecology. Bridging the Gap between Theory and Practice. Island Press, Washington.
Tilman, D. 1988. Plant Strategies and the Dynamics and Structure of Plant Communities. Princeton University Press, USA, New Jersey.
Várallyay, Gy. 1993. Soils in the region between the rivers Danube and Tisza (Hungary). In: J. Szujkó-Lacza and D. Kováts (eds.), The Flora of the Kiskunság National Park. Hungarian Natural History Museum. pp. 21–42.
Verhoeven, K. J. F., K. L. Simonsen and L. M. McIntyre. 2005. Implementing false discovery rate control: increasing your power. Oikos 108:643–647.
Vitousek, P. M. and L. R. Walker. 1987. Colonization, succession and resource availability: ecosystem-level interactions. In: A. J. Gray, M. J. Crawley and P. J. Edwards (eds.), Colonization, Succession and Stability Blackwell, Oxford. pp. 315–339.
Watkins, A. J. and J. B. Wilson. 1992. Fine-scale community structure of lawns. J. Ecol. 80:15–24.
Watkins, A. J. and J. B. Wilson. 2003. Local texture convergence: a new approach to seeking assembly rules. Oikos 102:525–532.
Weiher, E., G. D. P. Clarke and P. A. Keddy. 1998. Community assembly rules, morphological dispersion, and the coexistence of plant species. Oikos 81:309–322.
Wiens, J. A. 1989. Spatial scaling in ecology. Funct. Ecol. 3:385–397.
Wilson, J. B. and H. Gitay. 1995. Limitations to species coexistence: evidence for competition from field observations, using a patch model. J. Veg. Sci. 6:369–376.
Wilson, J. B. and R. J. Whittaker. 1995. Assembly rules demonstrated in a saltmarsh community. J. Ecol. 83:801–807.
Wilson, J. B., M. T. Sykes and R. K. Peet. 1995. Time and space in the community structure of a species-rich limestone grassland. J. Veg. Sci. 6:729–740.
Zobel, M. 1992. Plant species coexistence – the role of historical, evolutionary and ecological factors. Oikos 65:314–320.
About this article
Cite this article
Ruprecht, E., Bartha, S., Botta-Dukát, Z. et al. Assembly rules during old-field succession in two contrasting environments. COMMUNITY ECOLOGY 8, 31–40 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1556/ComEc.8.2007.1.5
- Plant interactions
- Spatial organization
- Spatial scale
- Species association