Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Aczél, J. and Daróczy, Z. 1975. On Measures of Information and their Characterizations. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
- Baczkowski, A., Joanes D.N. and Shamia, G. 2000. The distribution of a generalized diversity index due to Good. Environ. Ecol. Stat. 7: 329–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Colwell, R.K. 1979. Toward an unified approach to the study of species diversity. In: Grassle, J.F., Patil, G.P., Smith, W. and Taillie, C. (eds.), Ecological Diversity in Theory and Practice. International Cooperative Publishing House, Fairland, Maryland. pp. 75–91.Google Scholar
- Grassle J.F., Patil, G.P., Smith, W. and Taillie, C. (ed.). 1979. Ecological Diversity in Theory and Practice. International Cooperative Publishing House, Fairland, Maryland.Google Scholar
- Hill, M.O. 1973. Diversity and evenness: a unifying notation and its consequences. Ecology 54: 427–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hurlbert, S.H. 1971. The nonconcept of species diversity: a critique and alternative parameters. Ecology 52: 577–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Keylock, C.J. 2005. Simpson diversity and the Shannon-Wiener index as special cases of a generalized entropy. Oikos 109: 203–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Molinari, J. 1989. A calibrated index for the measurement of evenness. Oikos 56: 319–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Patil, G.P. and Taillie, C. 1979. An overview of diversity. In: Grassle, J.F., Patil, G.P., Smith, W. and Taillie, C. (eds.), Ecological Diversity in Theory and Practice. International Cooperative Publishing House, Fairland, Maryland, pp. 3–27.Google Scholar
- Patil, G.P. and Taillie, C. 1982. Diversity as a concept and its measurement. J. Am. Stat. Ass. 77: 548–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pielou, E.C. 1980. Review on Grassle et al. (1979). Biometrics 36: 742–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Podani,J. 1992. Space series analysis: processes reconsidered.Abstr. Bot. 16: 25–29.Google Scholar
- Rényi, A. 1961. On measures of entropy and information. In: Neyman, J. (ed.), Proceedings of the 4th Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, Vol. I. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp. 547–561.Google Scholar
- Rényi, A. 1970. Probability Theory. North-Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
- Ricotta, C. 2000. From theoretical ecology to statistical physics and back: self-similar landscape metrics as a synthesis of ecological diversity and geometrical complexity. Ecol. Model. 125: 245–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ricotta, C. 2003. Additive partition of parametric information and its associated _-diversity measure. Acta Biotheor. 51: 91–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ricotta, C. 2004. A parametric diversity measure combining the relative abundances and taxonomic distinctiveness of species. Divers. Distrib. 10: 143–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ricotta, C. 2005. Through the jungle of biological diversity. Acta Biotheor. 53: 29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Southwood, T.R.E. and Henderson, P.A. 2000. Ecological Methods, 3rd ed. Blackwell Science, Oxford.Google Scholar
- Sugihara, G. 1982. Comment to Patil and Taillie (1982). J. Am. Stat. Ass. 77: 564–565.Google Scholar
- Tóthmérész, B. 1993. DivOrd 1.50: A program for diversity ordering. Tiscia 27: 33–44.Google Scholar
- Tóthmérész, B. 1994. Statistical analysis of spatial pattern in plant communities. Coenoses 9: 33–41.Google Scholar
- Tóthmérész, B. 1995. Comparison of different methods for diversity ordering. J. Veg. Sci. 6: 283–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Tóthmérész, B. 1998. On the characterization of scale-dependent diversity. Abstr. Bot. 22: 149–156.Google Scholar
- Tsallis, C. 1988. Possible generalization of Boltzmann-Gibbs statistics. J. Stat. Phys. 52: 479–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Tsallis, C. 2002. Entropic nonextensivity: a possible measure of complexity. Chaos, Solitons and Fractals 13: 371–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copyright information
© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest 2005
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.