The quantification of habitat architecture for explanations of arthropod assemblage patterns: a comparison of two methods

Abstract

A drop disc, originally conceived as a quick and easy method of measuring vegetation height, was compared to the more labour-intensive point quadrat pins in terms of usefulness in quantifying the vertical architecture of field-layer vegetation at a number of broadleaved woodland sites in Buckinghamshire, UK. The drop disc produced measures of height which correlated strongly with those of the point quadrat, as well as a potentially useful value corresponding to ‘volume of vegetation’, and it is suggested that this technique was relatively more efficient at producing useful data. A number of measures of architectural complexity showed considerable variation in how they ranked sites based upon both real and contrived data. One of these, Fisher’s (or Williams’) alpha, is shown to be unsuitable for this application. Based upon the weak and non-significant correlations of derived statistics, the practical difficulties in measuring architecture and unfounded assumptions that regard all arthropod species en masse, it is reasoned that explanations of community patterns with respect to architecture must be treated with caution.

References

  1. Bokdam, J. and J. Maurits Gleichman. 2000. Effects of grazing by free-ranging cattle on vegetation dynamics in a continental north-west European heathland. J. Appl. Ecol. 37: 415–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bright, P. W. and P. A. Morris. 1990. Habitat requirements of Dormice (Muscardinus avellanarius) in relation to woodland management in Southwest England. Biol. Conserv. 54: 307–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dennis, P., G. B. Usher and A. D. Watt. 1995. Lowland woodland structure and pattern and the distribution of arboreal, phytophagous arthropods. Biodivers. Conserv. 4: 728–744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Denno, R. F. and G. K. Roderick. 1991. Influence of patch size, vegetation texture, and host plant architecture on the diversity, abundance, and life history styles of sap feeding herbivores. In: S.S. Bell, E.D. McCoy and H.R. Mushinsky (eds.), Habitat Structure: the Physical Arrangement of Objects in Space. Chapman and Hall, London, pp. 169–196.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Diaz Narradas, M. C., F. Garcia Novo, M. Collantes and M. Zunzunegui. 2001. Vertical structure of wet grasslands under grazed and non-grazed conditions in Tierra del Fuego. J. Veg. Sci. 12: 385–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fisher, R. A., A. S. Corbet and C. B. Williams. 1943. The relation between the number of species and the number of individuals in a random sample of an animal population. J. Anim. Ecol. 12: 42–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Frontier, S. 1987. Applications of fractal theory to ecology. In: P. Legendre and L. Legendre (eds.), Developments in Numerical Ecology. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 335–378.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Gilbert, F. S. 1985. Diurnal activity patterns in hoverflies. Ecol. Entomol. 10: 385–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Goldsmith, F. B., C. M. Harrison and A. J. Morton. 1986. Description and analysis of vegetation. In: P.B. Moore and S.B. Chapman (eds.), Methods in Plant Ecology. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, pp. 437–524.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Halaj, J., D. W. Ross and A. R. Moldenke. 2000. Importance of habitat structure to the arthropod food-web in Douglas-fir canopies. Oikos 90: 139–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hurlbert, S. H. 1971. The nonconcept of species diversity: a critique and alternative parameters. Ecology 52: 577–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. MacArthur, R. H. and J. W. MacArthur. 1961. On bird species diversity. Ecology 42: 594–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. McCoy, E. D. and S. S. Bell. 1991. Habitat structure: the evolution and diversification of a complex topic. In: E.D. McCoy, S.S. Bell and H.R. Mushinsky (eds.), Habitat Structure: the Physical Arrangement of Objects in Space. Chapman and Hall, London, pp. 3–27.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Morse, D. R., J. H. Lawton, M. M. Dodson and M. H. Williamson. 1985. Fractal dimension of vegetation and the distribution of arthropod body lengths. Nature 314: 731–733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Murdoch, W. W., F. C. Evans and C. H. Peterson. 1972. Diversity and pattern in plants and insects. Ecology 53: 819–828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Myers, J. H. and D. Bazely. 1991. Thorns, spines, prickles, and hairs: are they stimulated by herbivory and do they deter herbivores? In: D.W. Tallamy and M.J. Raupp (eds.), Phytochemical Induction by Herbivores. John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp. 325–344.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Raunkiaer, C. 1934. The Life Forms of Plants and Statistical Plant Geography. Clarendon, London.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Richardson, L. F. 1960. The problem of contiguity: an appendix to statistics of deadly quarrels. In: L. von Bertalanffy (ed.) General Systems Year Book V. Society for General Systems Research, Ann Arbor, MI, pp. 139–187.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rodwell, J. S. (ed.) 1991. British Plant Communities. Vol. 1. Woodlands and Scrub. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rosenberg, N. J. 1974. Microclimate: the Biological Environment. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sabo, S. R. 1980. Niche and habitat relations in subalpine bird communities of the White Mountains of New Hampshire. Ecol. Monogr. 50: 241–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Scheidler, M. 1990. Influence of habitat structure and vegetation architecture on spiders. Zool. Anz. 225: 333–340.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Southwood, T. R. E. 1986. Plant surfaces and insects - an overview. In: B. Juniper and T.R.E. Southwood (eds.), Insects and the Plant Surface. Edward Arnold, London, pp. 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Southwood, T. R. E., V. K. Brown and P. M. Reader. 1979. The relationships of plant and insect diversities in succession. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 12: 327–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Stewart, K. E. J., N. A. D. Bourn and J. A. Thomas. 2001. An evaluation of three quick methods commonly used to assess sward height in ecology. J. Appl. Ecol. 38: 1148–1154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Thomas, J. A. 1980. Why did the Large Blue become extinct in Britain? Oryx 15: 243–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wiens, J. A. 1974. Habitat heterogeneity and avian community structure in North American grasslands. Am. Midl. Nat. 91: 195–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Williamson, M. H. and J. H. Lawton. 1991. Measuring habitat structure with fractal geometry. In: S.S. Bell, E.D. McCoy and H.R. Mushinsky (eds.), Habitat Structure: The Physical Arrangement of Objects in Space. Chapman and Hall, London, pp. 69–86.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Moffatt.

Rights and permissions

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moffatt, C., McNeill, S. & Morton, A.J. The quantification of habitat architecture for explanations of arthropod assemblage patterns: a comparison of two methods. COMMUNITY ECOLOGY 6, 83–91 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1556/ComEc.6.2005.1.9

Download citation

Keyword

  • Architectural complexity
  • Drop disc
  • Fisher’s alpha
  • Habitat structure
  • Insect community
  • Point quadrat
  • Williams’ alpha