Objectifying thematic, spatial and temporal aspects of vegetation mapping for monitoring

Abstract

Ad hoc decisions during fieldwork reduce the accuracy and reliability of vegetation maps. A method is proposed to objectify vegetation (thematic aspects) mapping (spatial aspects) for monitoring (temporal aspects). The most accurate and reliable description of the vegetation is a list of all plant species found within a plot. Therefore, the proposed method is an interpolation of a spatially representative sample of permanent plots combined with aerial photo interpretation. The method is objective because surveyors do not have to make decisions during fieldwork based on their personal judgement. Moreover, it is flexible, because the classification and interpolation methods can be adapted to specific views or needs depending on the aim of a study.

The method was applied to an area in the north of the Netherlands in 1998. A sampling design with a density of 1 plot/ha was used, and interpolated with a perpendicular bisector. In 2002, the number of plots/ha was doubled. The influence of sample density on the mapping results was studied because it is an important decision to be made before fieldwork. Two plots/ha seem to be sufficient in order to obtain reliable information on patterns of plant species composition and vegetation types of the area, and their change over time. However, in patches where vegetation varies on a very small spatial scale this plot density was insufficient.

Abbreviations

DGPS:

Differential Global Positioning System

GIS:

Geographical Information System

References

  1. Bakker, J.P. 1979. Vegetation science and nature conservation. In: M.J.A. Werger (ed.), The Study of Vegetation. Junk, Den Haag, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bakker, J.P. and J.C. Ruyter. 1981. Effects of five years of grazing on a salt-marsh vegetation. A study with sequential mapping. Vegetatio 44:81–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bakker, J.P. 1989. Nature Management by Grazing and Cutting, Geobotany 14. Kluwer, Dordrecht, the Netherlands.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Burrough, P.A. 1986. Principals of Geographical Information Systems for Land Resources Assessment, Clarendon, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Burrough, P.A. 1987. Spatial aspects of ecological data. In: R.H.G. Jongman, C.J.F. ter Braak and O.F.R. van Tongeren (eds.), Data Analysis in Community and Landscape Ecology. Pudoc, Wageningen, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cain, S.A. 1938. The species-area curve. Amer. Midland Nat. 19:573–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cherrill, A. and C. McClean. 1999. Between-observer variation in the application of a standard method of habitat mapping by environmental consultants in the UK. J. Appl. Ecol. 36:989–1008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Curtis, J.T. and R.P. McIntosh. 1951. An upland Forest continuum in the prairie-forest border region of Wisconsin. Ecology 32: 3:476–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. De Vlas, J., and J.M. Marquenie. 2003. The Impact of Subsidence and Sea Level Rise in the Wadden Sea: Prediction and Field Verification, NAM, Assen, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dirkse, G.M. 1998. The validity of general purpose flora-based classification of vegetation, PhD thesis, University of Utrecht, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Droesen, W.J. 1999. Spatial modelling and monitoring of natural landscapes: with cases in the Amsterdam Waterworks Dunes, PhD thesis, Wageningen Agricultural University, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ellenberg, H. 1991. Zeigerwerte der Gefäszpflanzen (ohne Rubus). Scripta Geobotanica 18:9–166.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fisher, R, A.S. Corbet and C.B. Williams. 1943. The relation between the number of species and the number of individuals in a random sample from an animal population. J. Animal Ecol. 12:42–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fortin, M., P. Drapeau and P. Legendre. 1989. Spatial autocorrelation and sampling design in plant ecology. Vegetatio 83:209–222.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Goldsmith, F.B. 1991. Monitoring for Conservation Ecology, Chapman and Hall, London.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Hill, M.O. 1979. TWINSPAN,A FORTRAN program for arranging multivariate data into an ordered two-way table by classification of the individuals and attributes, Cornell University, Ithaca.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Huston, M.A. 1994. Biological Diversity; The Coexistence of Species on Changing Landscapes, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Janssen, J.A.M. 2001. Monitoring of salt-marsh vegetation by sequential mapping. PhD thesis, University of Amsterdam.

  19. Kent, M. and P. Coker. 1992. Vegetation Description and Analysis, a Practical Approach, Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kuechler, A.W. and I.S. Zonneveld. 1988. Vegetation Mapping, Handbook of Vegetation Science, part 10, Kluwer, Dordrecht, the Netherlands.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. Legendre, P. and L. Legendre. 1998. Numerical Ecology, Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lepš, J. and V. Hadincova. 1992. How reliable are your vegetation analyses? J. Veg. Sci. 3:119–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Londo, G. 1974. Successive mapping of dune slack vegetation. Vegetatio 29:51–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Marsman B.A. and J.J. De Gruijter. 1986. Quality of soil maps, A comparison of survey methods in a sandy area. Soil Survey Papers, no 15. Soil Survey Institute, Wageningen, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Mueller-Dombois, D. and H. Ellenberg. 1974. Aims and Methods of Vegetation Ecology, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Nilsson, C. 1992. Increasing the reliability of vegetation analyses by using a team of two investigators. J. Veg. Sci. 3:565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Oude Voshaar, J.H. 1981. Steekproefmethoden in het onderzoek naar verspreiding van perceelsvormen: oppervlakteschatting van mozaiken via steekproefpunten, IWIS-TNO, Wageningen, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Schaminée, J.H.J., A.H.F. Stortelder and V. Westhoff. 1995. De vegetatie van Nederland, Deel 1. Inleiding tot de plantensociologie – grondslagen, methoden en toepassingen. Opulus, Leiden.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Schouten M. and M. van Ool. 2003. Werken met waarden bij Staatsbosbeheer. Natuurbehoud als beschavingsnorm. Jaarverslag Staatsbosbeheer 2002.

  30. Smartt, P.F.M. and J.E.A. Grainger. 1974. Sampling for vegetation survey: some aspects of the behaviour of unrestricted, and stratified techniques. J. Biogeogr. 1:193–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Tokeshi, M. 1993. Species abundance patterns and community structure. Adv. Ecol. Res. 24:111–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Van Holst, A.F. 1990. Bodemkartering en bodemkaarten. In: H. de Bakker and W.P. Locher (eds), Bodemkunde van Nederland. Deel 2, bodemgeografie. Malmberg, Den Bosch, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Van der Maarel, E., R Boot, D. van Dorp and J. Rijntjes. 1985. Vegetation succession on the dunes near Oostvoorne, the Netherlands; a comparison of the vegetation in 1959 and 1980. Vegetatio 58:137–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Van der Meijden, R., 1996. Heukels’ Flora van Nederland, Wolters-Noordhoff, Groningen, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Van Dorp, D., R. Boot and E. van der Maarel. 1985. Vegetation succession on the dunes near Oostvoorne, the Netherlands, since 1934, interpreted from air photographs and vegetation maps. Vegetatio 58:123–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. E. Sanders.

Rights and permissions

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sanders, M.E., Dirkse, G.M. & Slim, P.A. Objectifying thematic, spatial and temporal aspects of vegetation mapping for monitoring. COMMUNITY ECOLOGY 5, 81–91 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1556/ComEc.5.2004.1.8

Download citation

Keywords

  • Accuracy
  • Objectivity
  • Permanent plots
  • Plant species
  • Sampling design
  • Sequential maps
  • Vegetation mapping