Advertisement

Community Ecology

, Volume 5, Issue 1, pp 7–17 | Cite as

Seasonal dynamics of plant species at fine scale in wooded pastures

  • F. KohlerEmail author
  • F. Gillet
  • M. A. Progin
  • J. M. Gobat
  • A. Buttler
Article

Abstract

A cell-grid method was used to survey seasonal changes in four herbaceous communities of a wooded pasture. Permanent plots consisted in 1-m2 grids subdivided into 100 cells of 1 dm2. In each cell of each plot and every month from May to September, we estimated dominance, and grazing occurrence of all species. Plant communities included an eutrophic grazed meadow, a temporary refused meadow, an underwood herb community and an oligotrophic lawn.

Our results showed that seasonal changes in species composition were very strong and scale-dependent. Changes at plot scale were mainly driven by a seasonal shift. Changes at cell scale suggested high small-scale dynamics of species. Despite high changes at cell scale, the structure of the community did not change and local species richness did not show any trend. We found no correlation between the turnover at cell scale and cattle activity.

We conclude that dynamics and internal species turnover of the community at fine scale and short time seem more driven by internal characteristics of the community than by disturbances induced by cattle. Furthermore, at seasonal scale, plant communities may be stable in their structure despite fluctuations in their texture.

Keywords

Carousel model Cattle activity Scale Spatial monitoring Species mobility Turnover Vegetation dynamics 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abdelmagid, A.H., M.J. Trlica and R.H. Hart. 1987. Soil and vegetation responses to simulated trampling. J. Range. Manage. 40:303–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bailey, D.W., J.E. Gross, E.A. Laca, L.R. Rittenhouse, M.B. Coughenour, D.M. Swift and P.L. Sims. 1996. Mechanisms that result in large herbivore grazing distribution patterns. J. Range. Manage. 49:386–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Casgrain, P. and P. Legendre 2001. The R Package for Multivariate and Spatial Analysis, Version 4.0 d4 – User’s Manual. Département de sciences biologiques, Université de Montréal. https://doi.org/www.fas.umontreal.caBIOL/legendre/
  4. Chiarucci, A., M. Mistral, I. Bonini, B.J. Anderson and J.B. Wilson. 2002. Canopy occupancy: How much of the space in plant communities is filled? Folia Geobot. Phytotax. 37:333–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Collins, S.L. and S.M. Glenn. 1991. Importance of spatial and temporal dynamics in species regional abundance and distribution. Ecology 72:654–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Deckers, J.A., F.O. Nachtergaele and O.C. Spaargaren (eds). 1998. World Reference Base for Soil Resources: Introduction. Publishing Company Acco, Leuven, NL.Google Scholar
  7. Dutilleul, P. 1993. Modifying the T-test for assessing the correlation between two spatial processes. Biometrics 49:305–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gallandat, J.-D. and F. Gillet. 1999. Le pâturage boisé jurassien. Bull. Soc. Neuchâtel. Sci. Nat. 122:5–25.Google Scholar
  9. Grant, S.A., D.E. Suckling, H.K. Smith, L. Torvell, T.D.A. Forbes and J. Hodgson. 1985. Comparative studies of diet selection by sheep and cattle - the hill grasslands. J. Ecol. 73:987–1004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Grime, J.P. 2001. Plant Strategies, Vegetation Processes, and Ecosystem Properties, Wiley, Chichester, UK.Google Scholar
  11. Grubb, P.J. 1977. The maintenance of species-richness in plant communities: The importance of the regeneration niche. Biol. Rev. 52:107–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Güsewell, S., A. Buttler and F. Klotzli. 1998. Short-term and long-term effects of mowing on the vegetation of two calcareous fens. J. Veg. Sci. 9:861–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Herben, T., F. Krahulec, V. Hadincová and M. Kovárová. 1993a. Small-scale spatial dynamics of plant-species in a grassland community over six years. J. Veg. Sci. 4:171–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Herben, T., F. Krahulec, V. Hadincová and H. Skálová. 1993b. Small-scale variability as a mechanism for large-scale stability in mountain grasslands. J. Veg. Sci. 4:163–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Huckle, J.M., J.A. Potter and R.H. Marrs. 2000. Influence of environmental factors on the growth and interactions between salt marsh plants: effects of salinity, sediment and waterlogging. J. Ecol. 88:492–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jakobsson, A. and O. Eriksson. 2000. A comparative study of seed number, seed size, seedling size and recruitment in grassland plants. Oikos 88:494–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jonsson, B.G. and J. Moen. 1998. Patterns in species associations in plant communities: the importance of scale. J. Veg. Sci. 9:327–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Klimes, L. 1999. Small-scale plant mobility in a species-rich grassland. J. Veg. Sci. 10:209–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Klimes, L., M. Dancák, M. Hájek, I. Jongepierová and T. Kucera. 2001. Scale-dependent biases in species counts in a grassland. J. Veg. Sci. 12:699–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Klimes, L. and J. Klimesova. 2002. The effects of mowing and fertilization on carbohydrate reserves and regrowth of grasses: do they promote plant coexistence in species-rich meadows? Evol. Ecol. 15:363–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Klimes, L., J. Klimesova, R. Hendriks and J. van Groenendael. 1997. Clonal plant architecture: a comparative analysis form and function. In: H. de Kroon and J. van Groenendael (eds), The Ecology and Evolution of Clonal Plants. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, NL, pp 1–29.Google Scholar
  22. Kohler, F., F. Gillet, J.-M. Gobat and A. Buttler. 2004. Seasonal vegetation changes in mountain pastures due to simulated effects of grazing. J. Veg. Sci. 15:143–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lafarge, M. 2001. Three approaches for analysing the dynamics of the horizontal layout of tillers in grass patches. Application to tall fescue swards surveyed over two growing seasons. Acta Oecol. 22:109–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lardner, H.A., S.B.M. Wright and R.D.H. Cohen. 2002. Leaf development of eight grass species following grazing. Can. J. Plant Sci. 82:747–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Legendre P. 2001. Program Mod_t_test. Département de sciences biologiques, Université de Montréal. https://doi.org/www.fas.umontreal.caBIOL/legendre/
  26. Mariott, C.A., G.R. Bolton, G.T. Barthram, J.M. Fisher and K. Hood. 2002. Early changes in species composition of upland sown grassland under extensive grazing management. Appl. Veg. Sci. 5:87–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Otsus, M. and M. Zobel. 2002. Small-scale turnover in a calcareous grassland, its pattern and components. J. Veg. Sci. 13:199–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Palmer, M.W. and G.M. Rusch. 2001. How fast is the carousel? Direct indices of species mobility with examples from an Oklahoma grassland. J. Veg. Sci. 12:305–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pärtel, M. and M. Zobel. 1995. Small-scale dynamics and species richness in successional alvar plant-communities. Ecography 18:83–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. R Development Core Team. 2003. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://doi.org/www.R-project.org
  31. Sykes, M.T., E. Van der Maarel, R.K. Peet and J.H. Willems. 1994. High species mobility in species-rich plant-communities - an intercontinental comparison.Folia Geobot. Phytotax. 29:439–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tamm, A., K. Kull and M. Sammul. 2002. Classifying clonal growth forms based on vegetative mobility and ramet longevity: whole community analysis. Evol. Ecol. 15:383–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Thórhallsdóttir, T.E. 1990. The dynamics of a grassland community: a simultaneous investigation of spatial and temporal heterogeneity at various scales. J. Ecol. 78:884–908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tutin, T.G., V.H. Heywood, N.A. Burges, D.H. Valentine, S.M. Walters and D.A. Webb. 1964–1980. Flora Europaea. Cambridge University Press. Vol. 1–5.Google Scholar
  35. Van der Maarel, E. 1996. Pattern and process in the plant community: Fifty years after A.S. Watt. J. Veg. Sci. 7:19–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Van der Maarel, E., V. Noest and M.W. Palmer. 1995. Variation in species richness on small grassland quadrats: niche structure or small-scale plant mobility? J. Veg. Sci. 6:741–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Van der Maarel, E. and M.T. Sykes. 1993. Small-scale plant species turnover in a limestone grassland: the carousel model and some comments on the niche concept. J. Veg. Sci. 4:179–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Van der Maarel, E. and M.T. Sykes. 1997. Rates of small-scale species mobility in alvar limestone grassland. J. Veg. Sci. 8:199–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Watt, A.S. 1962. The effect of excluding rabbits from grassland A (xerobrometum) in Breckland, 1936–60. J. Ecol. 50:181–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wilson, J.B., M.T. Sykes and R.K. Peet. 1995. Time and space in the community structure of a species-rich limestone grassland. J. Veg. Sci. 6:729–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zobel, M., M. Otsus, J. Liira, M. Moora and T. Möls. 2000. Is small-scale species richness limited by seed availability or microsite availability?. Ecology 81:3274–3282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest 2004

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. Kohler
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • F. Gillet
    • 1
    • 2
  • M. A. Progin
    • 2
  • J. M. Gobat
    • 2
  • A. Buttler
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Swiss Federal Research Institute WSLLausanneSwitzerland
  2. 2.Department of Plant EcologyInstitute of Botany, University of NeuchâtelNeuchâtelSwitzerland
  3. 3.Department of Chronoecology, UMR CNRS 6565, UFR Sciences et TechniquesUniversity of Franche-ComtéBesançonFrance

Personalised recommendations