Community Ecology

, Volume 5, Issue 1, pp 115–120 | Cite as

Dutch forest monitoring network, design and results

  • G. M. DirkseEmail author
  • W. P. Daamen


The new Dutch forest monitoring network is a policy-guided, multiple-use, GIS-oriented forest monitoring network. It is designed to provide the Dutch government, on a cyclic 8-year basis, with actual information about Dutch forests. Variables that reflect the information needs of policy makers and interest groups were selected by means of interviews and workshops. High-ranking variables are: wood stock, ownership, stand age, management status, biodiversity, carbon stock, and recreational use. These and other variables are being measured in 3622 forest sites, selected according to an unaligned systematic sampling design. The data are stored in an ORACLE data base, made accessible through the internet.

The Dutch forest area approximates a total of 360 000 ha; 46% is owned by private owners and organisations for nature conservation. Coniferous forests dominate (60%). Most forests were planted in 1940–1980. The total above ground volume of living trunk wood amounts to 56.3 million m3. The most common tree species are Quercus robur, Pinus sylvestris, and Betula pendula, the most common shrubs are Sorbus aucuparia, Prunus serotina, and Rhamnus frangula; while the most common other plant species are Deschampsia flexuosa, Rubus fruticosus s.l., and Dryopteris dilatata.


Forest variables Inventory Sampling Netherlands 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Brus, D.J. and J.J. de Gruijter. 1997. Random sampling of geostatistical modelling? Choosing between design-based and model-based sampling strategies for soil (with discussion). Geoderma 80:1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek. 1971. De Nederlandse bosstatistiek 1964–1968. Staatsuitgeverij, ’s-Gravenhage.Google Scholar
  3. Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek. 1985. De Nederlandse bosstatistiek, deel 1 de oppervlakte bos, 1980–1983. Staatsuitgeverij, ’s-Gravenhage.Google Scholar
  4. De Gruijter, J.J. 2000. Sampling for Spatial Inventory and Monitoring of Natural Resources, Alterra-rapport 070. Alterra, Wageningen.Google Scholar
  5. De Vries, P.G. 1986. Sampling Theory for Forest Sampling, Springer, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dirkse, G.M. 1998. The validity of general purpose flora-based classification of vegetation, Scientific Contributions 14. DLO-Intituut voor Bos- en Natuuronderzoek, Wageningen.Google Scholar
  7. Dirkse, G.M. and W.P. Daamen. 2000. Pilot Meetnet Functievervulling bos, natuur en landschap, Alterra-rapport 097. Alterra, Wageningen.Google Scholar
  8. Dirkse, G.M., W.P. Daamen and C. Schuiling. 2001. Toelichting bossenkaart, Alterra-rapport 292. Alterra, Wageningen.Google Scholar
  9. Dirkse, G.M., W.P. Daamen, H. Schoonderwoerd and J.M. Paasman. 2003. Meetnet Fuctievervulling bos Het Nederlandse bos in 2001–2002. Expertisecentrum LNV, Ede.Google Scholar
  10. Kenkel, N.C., P. Juhász-Nagy and J. Podani. 1989. On sampling procedures in population and community ecology. Vegetatio 83:195–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. LNV 2000. Natuur voor mensen mensen voor natuur. Nota natuur bos en landschap in de 21e eeuw. Ministerie Landbouw, Natuurbeheer en Visserij, Den Haag.Google Scholar
  12. Quenouille, M.H. 1949. Problems in plane sampling. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 20:355–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Smartt, P.F.M. and J.E.A. Grainger. 1974. Sampling for vegetation survey: some aspects of the behaviour of unrestricted, and stratified techniques. J. Biogeogr. 1:193–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. UNECE and FAO. 2000. Forest Resources of Europe, CIS, North America, Austalia, Japan and New Zealand. United Nations, New York and Geneva.Google Scholar
  15. Van der Meijden, R. 1996. Heukels’ flora van Nederland, Wolters-Noordhoff, Groningen.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest 2004

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Alterra, Green World ResearchWageningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations