Spatially synoptic multivariate image data implicitly embody information on landscape pattern, for which analytical techniques of explicit pattern extraction are evolving. In parallel, a multiplicity of environmental indicators’ is being generated in the arena of geographic information systems. Landscape ecological analysis offers substantial opportunity for configuring these indicators synoptically as cells over spatial extents and for stacking them into complementary sets of image-structured multiple environmental indicators whereby the values of the indicators become intensity analogs of brightness for spectral bands. As environmental signal analogs of multiband images, these data become available to image portrayal in both graytone and quasi-color renditions to reveal joint properties of pattern for visual interpretation. Likewise, many of the conventional image analysis operations can be conceived more broadly to allow their application in the indicator context. This includes combinatorial approaches such as calculation of an NDVI equivalent from indicator intensities. Similarly, supervised and unsupervised analyses can have meaningful application in the context of multiple environmental indicators. Furthermore, newer techniques of pattern-based image segmentation can also be applied. Application to habitat modeling for vertebrates from Gap Analysis shows the effectiveness of the approach.
Digital Elevation Model
Geographic Information System
Normalized Difference Vegetation Index
Palette Homogeneity Among Segmentation Elements
Progressively Segmenting Images
Regional Habitat Importance Index
Argent, D., J. Bishop, J. Stauffer, R. Carline and W. Myers. 2003. Predicting freshwater fish distributions using landscape-level variables. Fisheries Research 60: 17–32.
Brauning, D. 1992. Atlas of Breeding Birds in Pennsylvania. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, PA.
Bruzzone, L. and D. Prieto. 2000. Automatic analysis of the difference image for unsupervised change detection. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 38: 1171–1182.
Chen, J., P. Gong, C. He, R. Pu and P. Shi. 2003. Land-use/land-cover change detection using improved change vector analysis. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 69: 369–379.
Coppin, P. and M. Bauer. 1996. Digital change detection in forest ecosystems with remote sensing imagery. Remote Sensing Reviews 13: 207–234.
Davis, F. W., D. M. Stoms, J. E. Estes, J. Scepan and J. M. Scott. 1990. An information systems approach to biological diversity. International Journal of Geographic Information Systems 4: 55–78.
Fortran, R. T. T. 1995. Land Mosaics: The Ecology of Landscapes and Regions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K. 632 p.
Fortran, R. T. T. and M. Godron. 1986. Landscape Ecology. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Frohn, R. 1998. Remote Sensing for Landscape Ecology: New Metric Indicators for Monitoring, Modeling, and Assessment of Ecosystems. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL.
Gibson, P. and C. Power. 2000. Introductory Remote Sensing: Principles and Practices. Taylor and Francis, New York.
Gong, P. 1993. Change detection using principal component analysis and fuzzy set theory. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing 19: 22–29.
Isaaks, E. and R. M. Shrivastava. 1989. An Introduction to Applied Geostatistics. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
James, M. 1985. Classification Algorithms. John Wiley & Sons, London, UK.
Jensen, J. 2000. Remote Sensing of the Environment: An Earth Resource Perspective. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Lunetta, R. and C. Elvidge, eds. 1998. Remote Sensing Change Detection: Environmental Monitoring Methods and Applications. Ann Arbor Press, Ann Arbor, Ml.
Mas, J. 1999. Monitoring land-cover changes: a comparison of change detection techniques. International Journal of Remote Sensing 20: 139–152.
McGarigal, K. and B. Marks. 1995. FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. General Technical Report PNW 351, U.S. Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station.
Miller, E. W., Ed. 1995. A Geography of Pennsylvania. The Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park, PA.
Myers, W. 2000. Landscape scale ecological mapping of Pennsylvania forests. Research Rept. ER2002, Environmental Resources Research Institute, The Pennsylvania State University, Univ. Park, PA 16802 USA.
Myers, W. 2003. Doubly segmented images for pattern-based approach to change detection. Final report on NASA Research Project NAG5-1054. Research Report PSIE 2003-6, Penn State Institutes of Environment, The Pennsylvania State University, Univ. Park, PA 16802 USA. 90 pp. + CD-ROM.
Myers, W., J. Bishop, R. Brooks, T. O’Connell, D. Argent, G. Storm, J. Stauffer, Jr. and R. Carline. 2000. The Pennsylvania GAP Analysis Final Report. The Pennsylvania State University, Univ. Park, PA 16802.
Myers, W., J. Bishop, R. Brooks and G. P. Patil. 2001. Composite spatial indexing of regional habitat importance. Community Ecology 2: 213–220.
Myers, W., G. P. Patil and C. Taillie. 1999. Conceptualizing pattern analysis of spectral change relative to ecosystem status. Ecosystem Health 5: 285–293.
Myers, W., G. P. Patil and C. Taillie. 2003. Doubly segmented proxy images for multi-scale landscape ecology and ecosystem health. Community Ecology 4:163–183.
Olivieri, S. T. and E. H. Backus. 1992. Geographic information systems (GIS) Applications in biological conservation. Biology International 25:10–16.
Rogan, J., J. Miller, D. Stow, J. Franklin, L. Levien and C. Fisher. 2003. Land-cover change monitoring with classification trees using Landsat TM and ancillary data. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 69: 793–804.
Scott, J. M., F. Davis, B. Custi, R. Noss, B. Butterfield, C. Groves, H. Anderson, S. Caicco, F. D’Erchia, T. C. Edwards, Jr., J. Ulliman and R. G. Wright. 1993. Gap analysis: A geographic approach to protection of biological diversity. Wildlife Monographs No. 123.
Singh, A. 1989. Digital change detection techniques using remotely sensed data. International Journal of Remote Sensing 10: 989–1003.
Tso, B. and P. Mather. 2001. Classification Methods for Remotely Sensed Data. Taylor and Francis, New York.
Walrath, D. 2000. Multiscale analysis of avian distributions in Pennsylvania. Master of Science Thesis in Ecology, The Pennsylvania State University, Univ. Park, PA 16802 USA.
Wilkie, D. and J. Finn. 1996. Remote Sensing Imagery for Natural Resources Monitoring: A Guide for First-Time Users. Columbia University Press, New York.
Prepared with partial support from NASA Biospheric Sciences Branch, Goddard Space Flight Center, U.S. EPA Star Grant for Atlantic Slope Consortium Cooperative Agreement, and the NSF Digital Government Program, Division of Experimental and Integrative Activities, Directorate for Computer and Information Science and Engineering. The contents have not been subjected to Agency review and therefore do not necessarily reflect the views of the Agencies and no official endorsement should be inferred.
About this article
Cite this article
Myers, W.L., Patil, G.P., Taillie, C. et al. Synoptic environmental indicators as image analogs for landscape analysis. COMMUNITY ECOLOGY 4, 205–217 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1556/ComEc.4.2003.2.7
- Change detection
- Clustering algorithms
- Environmental indicators
- Geographic information systems
- Image analysis
- Landscape ecology
- Remote sensing
- Species habitat
- Species richness