Predominant phenotypic traits of disturbed tropical dry deciduous forest vegetation in northern India
The study examined the vegetation composition and phenotypic traits at five sites, differing in degree of disturbance, in a tropical dry deciduous forest of India. A total of 49 species and 4033 individuals (≥ 9.6 cm dbh) were enumerated in the cumulative 15-ha permanently protected area. The study revealed that the five sites represented five more or less different communities (species combinations with different dominants). On the basis of phenotypic traits, these communities or sites could not be discriminated, either by proportion of species belonging to different trait categories or by the cumulative importance value of the trait categories. As a result, disturbance did not affect the predominant traits. Evidently, all the communities shared the major phenotypic traits of the dry deciduous forest. Small leaf size, medium leaf texture, rough bark texture and medium deciduousness characterized the dry deciduous forest vegetation. Both the percent of species and importance values were larger for medium or less deciduous trait categories than for highly deciduous trait, representing a trade-off between water loss and the period of dry matter synthesis.
KeywordsBark texture Deciduousness Disturbance Dry tropical forest Leaf size and texture Plant functional traits Relative importance value
NomenclatureVerma et al. (1985)
- Bjorkman, O. 1981. Responses to different quantum flux densities. In: O.L. Lang, P.S. Nobel, C.B. Osmond and H. Ziegler (eds), Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology, vol. 12A. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 57–107.Google Scholar
- Champion, H.G. and S.K. Seth. 1968. A Revised Survey of the Forest Types of India. Government of India Publication, New Delhi.Google Scholar
- Chapin, F.S. 1993. Functional role of growth forms in ecosystem and global processes. In: J.R. Ehleringer and C.B. Field (eds.), Scaling Physiological Processes: Leaf to Globe. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp. 287–312.Google Scholar
- Curtis, J.T. 1959. The Vegetation of Wisconsin: An Ordination of Plant Communities. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison.Google Scholar
- Gitay, H. and I.R. Noble. 1997. What are functional types and how should we seek them? In: T.M. Smith, H.H. Shugart and F.I. Woodward (eds), Plant Functional Types: Their Relevance to Ecosystem Properties and Global Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 3–19.Google Scholar
- Levit, J. 1972. Responses of Plants to Environmental Stress. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
- Skarpe, C. 1996. Plant functional types and climate in a southern African savanna. J. Peg. Sci. 7: 397–404.Google Scholar
- SPSS. 1997. SPSS Base 7.5 Applications Guide. SPSS Inc., Chicago.Google Scholar
- Verma, D.M., P.C. Pant and M.I. Hanfi. 1985. Flora of Raipur, Durg and Rajnandgaon. Botanical Survey of India, Howrah.Google Scholar
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.