We performed a computer assisted experiment to test the accuracy of different ratio scales in estimating vegetation cover. Sixteen subjects estimated the cover level of artificial vegetation patterns displayed on the screen for various levels of resolution (from presence/absence to 100 different states, each measured on the ratio scale). We found that estimation error is minimum when the range of cover is divided into ten equal parts. Finer resolution gives less precise estimation since subjects tend to divide cover level into ten or at most twenty intervals in their mind.
Aberdeen, J. E. C. 1958. The effect of quadrat size, plant size and plant distribution on frequency estimates in plant ecology. Aust. J. Bot. 6:47–58
Avena, G., C. Blasi, E. Feoli and A. Scoppola. 1981. Measurement of the predictive value of species lists for species cover in phytosociological samples. Vegetatio 45: 77–84.
Bannister, P. 1966. The use of subjective estimates of cover-abundance as the basis for ordination. J. Ecol. 54: 665–674.
Becking, R. W. 1957. The Zurich-Montpellier school of phytosociology. Bot. Rev. 23:411–488.
Braun-Blanquet, J. 1964. Pflanzensoziologie, Grundzüge der Vegetationskunde. 3. Aufl. Springer, Wien, New York.
Dietz, H. and T. Steinlein. 1996. Determination of plant species cover by means of image analysis. J. Veg. Sci. 7: 131–136.
Gotfryd, A., R. and I. C. Hansell. 1985. The impact of observer bias on multivariate analyses of vegetation structure. Oikos 45:223–234.
Haslett, J. R. 1994. Community structure and the fractal dimensions of mountain habitats. J. Theoret. Biol. 167:407–411
Hatton, T. J., N. E. West and P. S. Johnson. 1986. Relationships of the error associated with ocular estimation and percent cover. J. Range Manag. 39:91–92.
Jensen, S. 1978. Influences of transformation of cover values on classification and ordination of lake vegetation. Vegetatio 37: 19–31.
Kennedy, K. A. and P. A. Addison. 1987. Some consideration for the use of visual estimates of plant cover in biomonitoring. J. Ecol. 75: 151–157.
Klimeš, L., M. Denčák, M. Hájek, I. Jongepierova and T. Kučera. 2001. Scale-dependent biases in the species counts in grassland. J. Veg. Sci. 12: 699–704.
Lepš, J. and V. Hadincová. 1992. How reliable are our vegetation analyses? J. Veg. Sci. 3: 119–124.
Londo, G. 1976. The decimal scale for relevés of permanent quadrats. Vegetatio 33: 61–64.
Maarel, E. van der 1979. Transformation of cover-abundance values in phytosociology and its effects on community similarity. Vegetatio 39: 97–114.
Milne, B. T. 1992. Spatial aggregation and neutral models in fractal landscapes. Am. Nat. 139: 32–57.
Noy-Meir, I. 1973. Data transformation in ecological ordination. I. Some advantages of non-centering. J. Ecol. 61: 329–341.
Noy-Meir, I., D. Walker and W. T. Williams. 1975. Data transformation in ecological ordination. II. On the meaning of data standardization. J. Ecol. 63: 779–800.
Peet, R. K., T. R. Wentworth and P. S. White. 1998. A flexible, multipurpose method for recording vegetation composition and structure. Castanea 63: 262–274.
Sugihara, G. and R. M. May. 1990. Applications of fractals in ecology. Trends. Ecol. Evol. 5: 79–86.
Smith, A. D. 1944. A study of the reliability of range vegetation estimates. Ecology 25: 441–448.
Sykes, J. M., A. D. Horrill and M. D. Mountford. 1983. Use of visual cover assessments as quantitative estimators of some British woodland taxa. J. Ecol. 71: 437–450.
Zar, J. H. 1999. Biostatistical Analysis. 4th ed. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey. 663 pp.
About this article
Cite this article
Hahn, I., Scheuring, I. The effect of measurement scales on estimating vegetation cover: a computer-assisted experiment. COMMUNITY ECOLOGY 4, 29–33 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1556/ComEc.4.2003.1.3
- Artificial vegetation pattern
- Estimation bias
- Estimation error
- Ratio scale
- Visual assessment