Advertisement

Community Ecology

, Volume 15, Issue 2, pp 147–157 | Cite as

Drivers of herb-layer species diversity in two unmanaged temperate forests in northern Spain

  • F. M. SabatiniEmail author
  • B. Jiménez-Alfaro
  • S. Burrascano
  • C. Blasi
Article

Abstract

The identification of the drivers of diversity in understorey plant assemblages is a major challenge in forest ecology. However, it is not yet fully understood whether the same factors consistently affect different facets of species organization, such as species richness, composition and turnover. Here, we compare the influence of fine-scale environmental variables and spatial organization on the herb-layer flora of two unmanaged and ecologically different forest stands in the Muniellos Biosphere Reserve, Northern Spain. The aims of our study are to identify the most important factors influencing different facets of herb-layer plant organization, and to test whether the effect of such drivers is consistent across facets and forest types. We used Generalized Linear Models, Redundancy Analysis and Multiple Regression on Distance Matrices to model, respectively, the response of species richness, species composition and species turnover to spatial distances as well as to several environmental factors, including forest structure, light conditions, soil and topographical features. We observed a substantial consistency among variables affecting the different facets of ground-layer species organization within stands, with a subset of topographical variables with a transversal effect across facets. Although potential solar radiation was the main variable influencing species richness in the two stands, the factors shaping species composition and turnover varied across forest types: in the beech stand, slope and canopy openness were the main determinants of herb-layer species diversity and turnover; in the oak stand, the main drivers of species composition were related to topography and spatial structure, while spatial distance was the main driver of species turnover. Our study shows that the ecological processes driving fine-scale variation of ground-layer plant richness and composition are similar to those driving species turnover. Although the ecological factors shaping different facets may be the same, we highlight that, at least in temperate forests, these factors are system-specific and vary according to forest types.

Keywords

Beta-diversity European beech Multiple Regression on Distance Matrices Old-growth Sessile oak 

Abbreviations

GLM

Generalized Linear Models

MRM

Multiple Regression on Distance Matrices

PAR

Photosynthetic Active Radiation

PCNM

Principal Coordinates of Neighbour Matrices

PCO

Principal Coordinates Analysis

RDA

Redundancy Analysis

VWC

Volumetric Water Content

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Supplementary material

42974_2014_15020147_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (263 kb)
Supplementary material, approximately 270 KB.

References

  1. Barbati, A., R. Salvati, B. Ferrari, D. Di Santo, A. Quatrini, L. Portoghesi, D. Travaglini, F. Iovino and S. Nocentini. 2012. Assessing and promoting old-growthness of forest stands: Lessons from research in Italy. Plant Biosyst. 146:167–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barbier, S., F. Gosselin, and P. Balandier. 2008. Influence of tree species on understory vegetation diversity and mechanisms involved - A critical review for temperate and boreal forests. For. Ecol. Manag. 254:1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bartels, S. F. and H. Y. H. Chen. 2010. Is understory plant species diversity driven by resource quantity or resource heterogeneity? Ecology 91:1931–1938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blanchet, F. G., P. Legendre and D. Borcard. 2008. Forward selection of explanatory variables. Ecology 89:2623–2632.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Blanco Castro, E., M. A. Casado González, M. Costa Tenorio, R. Escribano Bombín, M. García Antón, M. Génova Fuster, F. Gómez Manzaneque, J. C. Moreno Sáiz, C. Morla Juaristi, P. Regato Pajares and H. Sáiz Ollero. 1997. Los bosques ibéricos. Planeta, Barcelona, Spain.Google Scholar
  6. Borcard, D., P. Legendre, C. Avois-Jacquet and H. Tuomisto. 2004. Dissecting the spatial structure of ecological data at multiple scales. Ecology 85:1826–1832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Borcard, D., P. Legendre and P. Drapeau. 1992. Partialling out the spatial component of ecological variation. Ecology 73:1045–1055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burrascano, S., F. M. Sabatini and C. Blasi. 2011. Testing indicators of sustainable forest management on understorey composition and diversity in southern Italy through variation partitioning. Plant Ecol. 212:829–841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burrascano, S., I. Anzellotti, E. Carli, E. Del Vico, L. Facioni, F. Pretto, F. M. Sabatini, A. Tilia and C. Blasi. 2013a. Drivers of beta-diversity variation in Bromus erectus semi-natural dry grasslands. Appl. Veg. Sci. 16:404–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Burrascano, S., W. S. Keeton, F. M. Sabatini and C. Blasi. 2013b. Commonality and variability in the structural attributes of moist temperate old-growth forests: a global review. For. Ecol. Manag. 291:458–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Burton, J. I., D. J. Mladenoff, M. K. Clayton and J. A. Forrester. 2011. The roles of environmental filtering and colonization in the fine-scale spatial patterning of ground-layer plant communities in north temperate deciduous forests. J. Ecol. 99:764–776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Černý, T., J. Doležal, Š. Janeček, M. Šrůtek, M. Valachovič, P. Petřík, J. Altman, M. Bartoš and J.-S. Song. 2013. Environmental correlates of plant diversity in Korean temperate forests. Acta Oecol. 47:37–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chavez, V. and S. E. Macdonald. 2010. The influence of canopy patch mosaics on understory plant community composition in boreal mixedwood forest. For. Ecol. Manag. 259:1067–1075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chiarucci, A., V. De Dominicis and J. B. Wilson. 2001. Structure and floristic diversity in permanent monitoring plots in forest ecosystems of Tuscany. For. Ecol. Manag. 141:201–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fernández Prieto, J. A. and A. Bueno Sánchez 1992. A new classification of the forests of the Muniellos Biological Reserve in Northwest Spain. Vegetatio 102: 33–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fernández Prieto, J. A., A. Bueno Sánchez, J. A. Alonso Felpete and B. Jiménez-Alfaro. 2002. Mapa de vegetación. Plan de Investigación de Muniellos 2002. INDUROT, Universidad de Oviedo, Principado de Asturias.Google Scholar
  17. Gilbert, B. and M. J. Lechowicz. 2004. Neutrality, niches, and dispersal in a temperate forest understory. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 101:7651–7656.Google Scholar
  18. Gilliam, F. S. 2007. The ecological significance of the herbaceous layer in temperate forest ecosystems. Bioscience 57:845–858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Goslee, S. 2010. Correlation analysis of dissimilarity matrices. Plant Ecol. 206:279–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Guèze, M., J. Paneque-Gálvez, A. C. Luz, J. Pino, M. Orta-Martínez, V. Reyes-García and M. J. Macía. 2013. Determinants of tree species turnover in a southern Amazonian rain forest. J. Veg. Sci. 24:284–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hubbell, S. P. 2001. The Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.Google Scholar
  22. Jiménez-Alfaro, B. and J.M. Iriondo, in press. Population dynamics of Aster pyrenaeus Desf., a threatened species of temperate forest edges: a view of meso- and micro-scales. Plant Biosystems. DOI 10.1080/11263504.2013.788094Google Scholar
  23. Jones, M.M., H. Tuomisto, D.B. Clark and P. Olivas. 2006. Effects of mesoscale environmental heterogeneity and dispersal limitation on floristic variation in rain forest ferns. J. Ecol. 94: 181–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jost, L. 2006. Entropy and diversity. Oikos 113:363–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Larsen, J. B. 1995. Ecological stability of forests and sustainable silviculture. For. Ecol. Manag. 73:85–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lemmon, P. E. 1957. A new instrument for measuring forest overstory density. J. Forest. 55:667–668.Google Scholar
  27. Li, Q., X. Yang, J. Soininen, C. J. Chu, J. Q. Zhang, K. L. Yu and G. Wang. 2011. Relative importance of spatial processes and environmental factors in shaping alpine meadow communities. J. Plant Ecol. 4:249–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lichstein, J. W. 2007. Multiple regression on distance matrices: a multivariate spatial analysis tool. Plant Ecol. 188:117–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. López Alvarez, J. 2002. La explotación del Monte de Muniellos (Asturias), 1766–1973. Ería: Revista cuatrimestral de geografía 58:273–286.Google Scholar
  30. McCune, B. and D. Keon. 2002. Equations for potential annual direct incident radiation and heat load. J. Veg. Sci. 13:603–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mikac, S., M. Klopf, I. Aniæ and H. Hasenauer. 2013. Using the tree growth model MOSES to assess the dynamics of Dinaric old-growth mixed beech–fir forest ecosystems. Plant Biosyst. 147:664–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pausas, J. G. and M. P. Austin. 2001. Patterns of plant species richness in relation to different environments: An appraisal. J. Veg. Sci. 12:153–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ricotta, C., S. Burrascano and C. Blasi. 2010. Incorporating functional dissimilarities into sample-based rarefaction curves: from taxon resampling to functional resampling. J. Veg. Sci. 21:280–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Roekaerts, M. 2002. The Biogeographical Regions Map of Europe – Basic principles of its creation and overview of its development. European Environmental Agency, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  35. Royo, A. A. and W. P. Carson. 2006. On the formation of dense understory layers in forests worldwide: consequences and implications for forest dynamics, biodiversity, and succession. Can. J. For. Res. 36:1345–1362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sabatini, F. M., J. I. Burton, R. M. Scheller, K. L. Amatangelo and D. J. Mladenoff. 2014a. Functional diversity of ground-layer plant communities in old-growth and managed northern hardwood forests. Appl. Veg. Sci. 17:398–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sabatini, F. M., S. Burrascano, H. Tuomisto and C. Blasi. 2014b. Ground Layer Plant Species Turnover and Beta Diversity in Southern-European Old-Growth Forests. PLoS ONE 9:e95244.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Tobisch, T. and T. Standovár. 2005. A comparison of vegetation patterns in the tree and herb layers of a hardwood forest. Community Ecol. 6:29–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Travaglini, D., D. Paffetti, L. Bianchi, A. Bottacci, F. Bottalico, G. Giovannini, A. Maltoni, S. Nocentini, C. Vettori and G. Calamini. 2012. Characterization, structure and genetic dating of an old-growth beech-fir forest in the northern Apennines (Italy). Plant Biosyst. 146:175–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tuomisto, H. 2010a. A diversity of beta diversities: straightening up a concept gone awry. Part 1. Defining beta diversity as a function of alpha and gamma diversity. Ecography 33:2–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tuomisto, H. 2010b. A diversity of beta diversities: straightening up a concept gone awry. Part 2. Quantifying beta diversity and related phenomena. Ecography 33:23–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tuomisto, H. and K. Ruokolainen. 2006. Analyzing or explaining beta diversity? Understanding the targets of different methods of analysis. Ecology 87:2697–2708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tuomisto, H., K. Ruokolainen and M. Yli-Halla. 2003. Dispersal, environment, and floristic variation of western Amazonian forests. Science 299:241–244.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Višnjić, Ć., S. Solaković, F. Mekić, B. Balić, S. Vojniković, M. Dautbašić, S. Gurda, F. Ioras, J. Ratnasingam and I. V. Abrudan. 2013. Comparison of structure, regeneration and dead wood in virgin forest remnant and managed forest on Grmeè Mountain in Western Bosnia. Plant Biosyst. 147:913–922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Whittaker, R. H. 1960. Vegetation of the Siskiyou Mountains, Oregon and California. Ecol. Monogr. 30:407–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Yu, M. and O. J. Sun. 2013. Effects of forest patch type and site on herb-layer vegetation in a temperate forest ecosystem. For. Ecol. Manag. 300:14–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Zhang, C. Y., X. H. Zhao and K. von Gadow. 2010. Partitioning temperate plant community structure at different scales. Acta Oecol. 36:306–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest 2014

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. M. Sabatini
    • 1
    Email author
  • B. Jiménez-Alfaro
    • 2
  • S. Burrascano
    • 1
  • C. Blasi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Environmental BiologyUniversity of RomeRomeItaly
  2. 2.Department of Botany and ZoologyMasaryk UniversityBrnoCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations