Over the last 30 years, ecological networks have been deployed to reduce global biodiversity loss by enhancing landscape connectivity. Bird species dwelling in woodland habitats that are embedded in agriculture-dominated landscapes are expected to be particularly sensitive to the loss of connectivity. This study aimed to determine the role of landscape connectivity in woodland bird species richness, abundance, and community similarity in north-east Brittany (north-west France). An exhaustive woodland selection protocol was carried out to minimize the effects of woodland size on the response variables. Connectivity of the woodland and forest network in the study area was evaluated using graph-theory, accounting for matrix permeability, and a characteristic median natal dispersal distance at the community level based on the bird species pool recorded in the sampled woodlands. Information-theoretic model selection, controlling for woodland size in all the cases, depicted the response of woodland birds at the community level to the connectivity of agriculture-dominated landscapes. On average, the sampled woodlands (n = 25) contained 15.5 ± 2.4 bird species, with an abundance of 25.1 ± 3.9, and had highly similar bird communities (species composition and proportion); eight species represented 57% of total abundance and were present in at least 22 woodlands. The performance of models improved when using effective, rather than Euclidean, interpatch distances in the connectivity assessment. Landscape connectivity was only significantly related to similarity of proportional species composition. Large woodlands contained communities with more similar species proportions in an inhospitable agricultural landscape matrix than in a more permeable one. Woodland size was the most relevant factor determining species abundance, indicating that the bird population sizes are primarily proportional to the local habitat availability. Connectivity in relation to landscape matrix permeability did not seem to induce the flow of woodland-dependent bird species that are dominant in the community but rather of matrix-dwelling bird species that are less dependent on woodland patch area. In conclusion, both habitat conservation and restoration (i.e., amount and quality), in combination with permeable landscape structures (such as heterogeneous land cover mosaics), are advocated for community level conservation strategies.
Akaike Information Criterion
Ordinary Least Squares
Adriaensen F., J.P. Chardon, G. De Blust, E. Swinnen, S. Villalba, H. Gulinck and E. Matthysen. 2003. The application of ‘least-cost’ modelling as a functional landscape model. Landscape Urban Plan. 64: 233–247.
Baker, L. 2007. Effect of corridors on the movement behavior of the jumping spider Phidippus princeps (Araneae, Salticidae). Can. J. Zool. 85: 802–808.
Batáry, P., A. Kovács-Hostyánszki, C. Fischer, T. Tscharntke and A. Holzschuh. 2012. Contrasting effect of isolation of hedges from forests on farmland vs. woodland birds. Community Ecol. 13: 155–161.
Baum, K.A., K.J. Haynes, F.P. Dillemuth and J.T. Cronin. 2004. The matrix enhances the effectiveness of corridors and stepping stones. Ecology 85: 2671–2676.
Bennett, A., K.R. Crooks and M. Sanjayan. 2006. The future of connectivity conservation. In: K.R. Crooks and M. Sanjayan (eds.), Connectivity Conservation. Cambridge Univ. Press, New York. pp. 676–694.
Benton, T.G., J.A. Vickery and J.D. Wilson. 2003. Farmland biodiversity: is habitat heterogeneity the key? Trends Ecol. Evol. 18: 182–188.
Bibby, C.J., N.D. Burgess and D.A. Hill. 1992. Bird Census Techniques. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
Bunn, A.G., D.L. Urban and T.H. Keitt. 2000. Landscape connectivity: A conservation application of graph theory. J. Environ. Manage. 59: 265–278.
Burnham, K.P. and D.R. Anderson. 2002. Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretical Approach. Springer-Verlag, New York.
Carranza, M.L., E. D’Alessandro, S. Saura and A. Loy. 2012. Connectivity providers for semi-aquatic vertebrates: the case of the endangered otter in Italy. Landscape Ecol. 27: 281–290.
Cleland, E.E. 2012. Biodiversity and ecosystem stability. Nat. Educ. Knowl. 3: 14.
Cook, W.M., K.T. Lane, B.L. Foster and R.D. Holt. 2002. Island theory, matrix effects and species richness patterns in habitat fragments. Ecol. Lett. 5: 619–623.
Crooks, K.R. and M. Sanjayan (eds.). 2006. Connectivity Conservation. Cambridge Univ. Press, New York.
Damschen, E.I., N.M. Haddad, J.L. Orrock, J.J. Tewksbury and D.J. Levey. 2006. Corridors increase plant species richness at large scales. Science 313 (5791): 1284–1286.
Davies, Z.G. and A.S. Pullin. 2007. Are hedgerows effective corridors between fragments of woodland habitat? An evidence-based approach. Landscape Ecol. 22: 333–351.
Decout, S., S. Manel, C. Miaud and S. Luque. 2012. Integrative approach for landscape-based graph connectivity analysis: a case study with the common frog (Rana temporaria) in human-dominated landscapes. Landscape Ecol. 27: 267–279.
Donald, P.F., R.E. Green and M.F. Heath, M.F. 2001. Agricultural intensification and the collapse of Europe’s farmland bird populations. Proc. Roy. Soc. B-Biol. Sci. 268 (1462): 25–29.
Ewers, R.M. and R.K. Didham. 2006. Confounding factors in the detection of species responses to habitat fragmentation. Biol. Rev. 81: 117–142.
Fall, A., M.J. Fortin, M. Manseau and D. O’Brien. 2007. Spatial graphs: Principles and applications for habitat connectivity. Ecosystems 10: 448–461.
Filippi-Codaccioni, O., V. Devictor, Y. Bas, J. Clobert and R. Julliard. 2010. Specialist response to proportion of arable land and pesticide input in agricultural landscapes. Biol. Conserv. 143: 883–890.
Fischer, C., A. Flohre, L.W. Clement, P. Batáry, W.W. Weisser, T. Tscharntke and C. Thies. 2011. Mixed effects of landscape structure and farming practice on bird diversity. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 141: 119–125.
Fischer, J. and D.B. Lindenmayer. 2006. Beyond fragmentation: the continuum model for fauna research and conservation in human-modified landscapes. Oikos 112: 473–480.
Foltête, J.C., C. Clauzel and G. Vuidel. 2012. A software tool dedicated to the modelling of landscape networks. Environ. Modell. Softw. 38: 316–327.
Fuller, R.J., D.E. Chamberlain, N.H.K. Burton and S.J. Gough. 2001. Distributions of birds in lowland agricultural landscapes of England and Wales: How distinctive are bird communities of hedgerows and woodland? Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 84: 79–92.
Fuller, R.J., S.A. Hinsley and R.D. Swetnam. 2004. The relevance of non-farmland habitats, uncropped areas and habitat diversity to the conservation of farmland birds. Ibis 146 (Suppl. 2): 22–31.
Gaston, K.J., R.G. Davies, C.D.L. Orme, V.A. Olson, G.H. Thomas, T.S. Ding, P.C. Rasmussen, J.J. Lennon, P.M. Bennett, I.P.F. Owens and T.M. Blackburn. 2007. Spatial turnover in the global avifauna. Proc. R. Soc. Biol. Sci. 274 (1618): 1567–1574.
Gil-Tena, A., R. Lecerf and A. Ernoult. 2013. Disentangling community assemblages to depict an indicator of biological connectivity: A regional study of fragmented semi-natural grasslands. Ecol. Indic. 24: 48–55.
Gilbert-Norton, L., R. Wilson, J. R. Stevens and K.H. Beard. 2010. A meta-analytic review of corridor effectiveness. Conserv. Biol. 24: 660–668.
Gregory, R.D., A. van Strien, P. Vorisek, A.W.G. Meyling, D.G. Noble, R.P.B. Foppen and D.W. Gibbons. 2005. Developing indicators for European birds. Philos. T.R. Soc. B. 360 (1454): 269–288.
Gurrutxaga, M., L. Rubio and S. Saura. 2011. Key connectors in protected forest area networks and the impact of highways: A transnational case study from the Cantabrian Range to the Western Alps (SW Europe). Landscape Urban Plan. 101: 310–320.
Haas, C.A. 1995. Dispersal and use of corridors by birds in wooded patches on an agricultural landscape. Conserv. Biol. 9: 845–854.
Hinsley, S.A., R.A. Hill, R.J. Fuller, P.E. Bellamy and P. Rothery. 2009. Bird species distributions across woodland canopy structure gradients. Community Ecol. 10: 99–110.
Houet, T., T.R. Loveland, L. Hubert-Moy, C. Gaucherel, D. Napton, C.A. Barnes and K. Sayler. 2010. Exploring subtle land use and land cover changes: a framework for future landscape studies. Landscape Ecol. 25: 249–266.
Hoyle, M. and F.S. Gilbert. 2004. Species richness of moss landscapes unaffected by short-term fragmentation. Oikos 105: 359–367.
Jongman, R.H.G., M. Külvik and I. Kristiansen. 2004. European ecological networks and greenways. Landscape Urban Plan. 68: 305–319.
Kadoya, T. 2009. Assessing functional connectivity using empirical data. Popul. Ecol. 51: 5–15.
Kindlmann, P. and F. Burel. 2008. Connectivity measures: a review. Landscape Ecol. 23: 879–890.
Laitila, J. and A. Moilanen. 2013. Approximating the dispersal of multi-species ecological entities such as communities, ecosystems or habitat types. Ecol. Model. 259: 24–29.
Lennon, J.J., P. Koleff, J.J.D. Greenwood and K.J. Gaston. 2001. The geographical structure of British bird distributions: diversity, spatial turnover and scale. J. Anim. Ecol. 70: 966–979.
Ludwig, M., H. Schlinkert, A. Holzschuh, C. Fischer, C. Scherber, A. Trnka, T. Tscharntke and P. Batáry. 2012. Landscape-moderated bird nest predation in hedges and forest edges. Acta Oecol. 45: 50–56.
Magurran, A. E. 2009. Measuring Biological Diversity. Blackwell, Oxford.
McRae, B.H. 2006. Isolation by resistance. Evolution 60: 1551–1561.
Moilanen, A. 2011. On the limitations of graph-theoretic connectivity in spatial ecology and conservation. J. Appl. Ecol. 48: 1543–1547.
Muratet, A., R. Lorrillière, P. Clergeau and C. Fontaine. 2013. Evaluation of landscape connectivity at community level using satellite-derived NDVI. Landscape Ecol. 28: 95–105.
Ockinger, E. and H.G. Smith. 2008. Do corridors promote dispersal in grassland butterflies and other insects? Landscape Ecol. 23: 27–40.
Oksanen, J., F. G. Blanchet, R. Kindt, P. Legendre, P.R. Minchin, R.B. O’Hara, G.L. Simpson, P. Solymos, M.H.H. Stevens and H. Wagner. 2013. vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.0–10. https://doi.org/CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan
Paradis, E., S.R. Baillie, W.J. Sutherland and R.D. Gregory. 1998. Patterns of natal and breeding dispersal in birds. J. Anim. Ecol. 67: 518–536.
Paradis E., J. Claude and K. Strimmer. 2004. APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics 20: 289–290.
Pascual-Hortal, L. and S. Saura. 2007. Impact of spatial scale on the identification of critical habitat patches for the maintenance of landscape connectivity. Landscape Urban Plan. 83: 176–186.
Peach, W.J., S.R. Baillie and D.E. Balmer. 1998. Long-term changes in the abundance of passerines in Britain and Ireland as measured by constant effort mist-netting. Bird Study 45: 257–275.
Peterson, A.P. 2002. Zoonomen Nomenclatural data. URL: https://doi.org/www.zoonomen.net
Price, B., C.A. McAlpine, A.S. Kutt, S.R. Phinn, D.V. Pullar and J.A. Ludwig. 2009. Continuum or discrete patch landscape models for savanna birds? Towards a pluralistic approach. Ecography 32: 745–756.
Ralph, C.J., G.R. Geupel, P. Pyle, T.E. Martin and D.F. DeSante. 1993. Handbook of Field Methods for Monitoring Landbirds. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-144. Albany, CA: Pacific Southwest Research Station, Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture.
Rayfield, B., M.J. Fortin and A. Fall. 2010. The sensitivity of least-cost habitat graphs to relative cost surface values. Landscape Ecol. 25: 519–532.
Rösch, V., T. Tscharntke, C. Scherber and P. Batáry. 2013. Landscape composition, connectivity and fragment size drive effects of grassland fragmentation on insect communities. J. Appl. Ecol. 50: 387–394.
Sala, O.E., F.S. Chapin III, J.J. Armesto, E. Berlow, J. Bloomfield, R. Dirzo, E. Huber-Sanwald, L.F. Huenneke, R.B. Jackson, A. Kinzig, R. Leemans, D.M. Lodge, H.A. Mooney, M. Oesterheld, N.L. Poff, M.T. Sykes, B.H. Walker, M. Walker and D.H. Wall. 2000. Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science 287(5459): 1770–1774.
Sauer, J.R., J.E. Hines and J. Fallon. 2004. The North American Breeding Bird Survey, results and analysis 1966–2003. Version 2004.1. Laurel, MD: USGS Patuxent Wildlife Research Center.
Saura, S. and L. Pascual-Hortal. 2007. A new habitat availability index to integrate connectivity in landscape conservation planning: comparison with existing indices and application to a case study. Landscape Urban Plan. 83: 91–103.
Saura, S. and L. Rubio. 2010. A common currency for the different ways in which patches and links can contribute to habitat availability and connectivity in the landscape. Ecography 33: 523–537.
Saura, S. and J. Torné. 2009. Conefor Sensinode 2.2: A software package for quantifying the importance of habitat patches for landscape connectivity. Environ. Modell. Softw. 24: 135–139.
Shanahan, D.F., C. Miller, H.P. Possingham and R.A. Fuller. 2011. The influence of patch area and connectivity on avian communities in urban revegetation. Biol. Conserv. 144: 722–729.
Smith, A., N. Koper, C.M. Francis and L. Fahrig. 2009. Confronting collinearity: comparing methods for disentangling the effects of habitat loss and fragmentation. Landscape Ecol. 24: 1271–1285.
Sutherland, G.D., A.S. Harestad, K. Price and K.P. Lertzman. 2000. Scaling of natal dispersal distances in terrestrial birds and mammals. Conserv. Ecol. 4 (1), 16, https://doi.org/www.consecol.org/vol4/iss1/art16.
Taylor, P.D., L. Fahrig, K. Henein and G. Merriam. 1993. Connectivity is a vital element of landscape structure. Oikos 68: 571–573.
Taylor, P.D., L. Fahrig and K.A. With. 2006. Landscape connectivity: a return to the basics. In: K.R. Crooks and M. Sanjayan (eds.), Connectivity Conservation. Cambridge University Press, New York. pp. 29–43.
Tellería, J.L. and T. Santos. 1995. Effects of forest fragmentation on a guild of wintering passerines: the role of habitat selection. Biol. Conserv. 71: 61–67.
Urban, D. and T. Keitt. 2001. Landscape connectivity: a graph-theoretic perspective. Ecology 82: 1205–1218.
Vannier, C. 2012. Analyse spatiale de structures paysagères en contexte agricole bocage. Cybergeo: European Journal of Geography, Environment, Nature, Landscape: 607. Available at https://doi.org/cybergeo.revues.org/25354?lang=en.
Venables, W.N. and B.D. Ripley. 2002. Modern Applied Statistics with S. Fourth edition. Springer, New York.
Verboom, J., A. Schotman, P. Opdam and J.A. J. Metz. 1991. European nuthatch metapopulations in a fragmented agricultural landscape. Oikos 61: 149–156.
Watts, K., A.E. Eycott, P. Handley, D. Ray, J.W. Humphrey and C.P. Quin. 2010. Targeting and evaluating biodiversity conservation action within fragmented landscapes: an approach based on generic focal species and least-cost networks. Landscape Ecol. 25: 1305–1318.
Wolda, H. 1981. Similarity indices, sample size and diversity. Oecologia 50: 296–302.
About this article
Cite this article
Gil-Tena, A., Nabucet, J., Mony, C. et al. Woodland bird response to landscape connectivity in an agriculture-dominated landscape: a functional community approach. COMMUNITY ECOLOGY 15, 256–268 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1556/ComEc.15.2014.2.14
- Alpha diversity
- Community similarity
- Ecological networks
- Landscape matrix permeability
- Spatial scale