Advertisement

Community Ecology

, Volume 13, Issue 2, pp 155–161 | Cite as

Contrasting effect of isolation of hedges from forests on farmland vs. woodland birds

  • P. BatáryEmail author
  • A. Kovács-Hostyánszki
  • C. Fischer
  • T. Tscharntke
  • A. Holzschuh
Article

Abstract

Hedges and forest edges play a major role in providing nesting sites, food resources and shelter for birds in agricul tural landscapes of western and central Europe. We investigated the response of farmland vs. woodland birds at two degrees of isolation of hedges from forest and to vegetation structure. We surveyed 200 m long sections of six forest edges, six hedges connected to forests and six isolated hedges. Species richness and abundance of farmland birds were higher in hedges than in forest edges, species richness and abundance of woodland birds were lower in hedges than in the forest edges. Species richness and abundance of both groups did not differ between connected and isolated hedges. Width and height of hedges and edges did not affect the species richness and abundance of either farmland or woodland birds. Furthermore, bird community composition differed between habitat types (hedge vs. forest edge) and also between hedge isolation levels (hedges connected to forest vs. isolated hedges). Based on our results, we emphasize the importance of hedges in conserving farmland birds and encourage policy makers to support hedge creation and maintenance with landscape-wide management strategies supporting a diverse hedge structure. Both connected and isolated hedges play an important role as they harbour different bird communities.

Keywords

Abundance Community composition Connectivity Forest edge Species richness 

Nomenclature

Peterson (2002) for birds Seybold (2009) for plants 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Supplementary material

42974_2012_1302155_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (477 kb)
Supplementary material, approximately 489 KB.

References

  1. Báldi, A. and P. Batáry. 2011. Spatial heterogeneity and farmland birds: different perspectives in Western and Eastern Europe. Ibis 153:875–876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barkow, A. 2002. Die ökologische Bedeutung von Hecken für Vögel. J. Ornithol. 143:383–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bas, Y., M. Renard and F. Jiguet. 2009. Nesting strategy predicts farmland bird response to agricultural intensity. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 134:143–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Batáry, P. and A. Báldi. 2004. Evidence of an edge effect on avian nest success. Conserv. Biol. 18:389–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Batáry, P., J. Fischer, A. Báldi, T.O. Crist and T. Tscharntke. 2011. Does habitat heterogeneity increase farmland biodiversity? Front. Ecol. Environ. 9:152–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Batáry, P., T Matthiesen and T. Tscharntke. 2010. Landscape-moderated importance of hedges in conserving farmland bird diver-sity of organic vs. conventional croplands and grasslands. Biol. Conserv. 143:2020–2027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baudry, J., R.G.H. Bunce and F. Burel. 2000. Hedgerows: An international perspective on their origin, function and management. J. Environ. Manage. 60:7–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bennett, A.F., S.A. Hinsley, P.E. Bellamy, R.D. Swetman and R. MacNally. 2004. Do regional gradients in land-use influence richness, composition and turnover of bird assemblages in small woods? Biol. Conserv. 119:191–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Berg, Å. and T. Pärt. 1994. Abundance of breeding farmland birds on arable and set-aside fields at forest edges.Ecography 17:147–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bibby, J.C., D.N. Burgess and A.D. Hill. 1992. Bird Census Techniques. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  11. Bradbury, R.B., A. Kyrkos, A.J. Morris, S.C. Clark, A.J. Perkins and J.D. Wilson. 2000. Habitat associations and breeding success of yellowhammers on lowland farmland. J. Appl. Ecol. 37:789–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chamberlain, D.E., B.J. Hatchwell and C.M. Perrins. 1995. Spaced out nests and predators: an experiment to test the effects of habitat structure. J. Avian Biol. 26:346–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Concepción, E.D. and M. Díaz. 2010. Relative effects of field- and landscape-scale intensification on farmland bird diversity in Mediterranean dry cereal croplands. Asp. Appl. Biol. 100:245–252.Google Scholar
  14. Cramp, S. 1992. The birds of the Western Palearctic. Vol. VI. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  15. Davies, Z.G. and A.S. Pullin. 2007. Are hedgerows effective corridors between fragments of woodland habitat? An evidence-based approach. Landscape Ecol. 22:333–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Díaz, M., R. Carbonell, T. Santos and J.L. Tellería. 1998. Effects of pine plantations on bird communities of the Spanish plateaux: biogeography, landscape and vegetation effects. J. Appl. Ecol. 35:562–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Donald, P.F., R.E. Green and M.F. Heath. 2001. Agricultural intensification and the collapse of Europe’s farmland bird populations. Proc. Roy. Soc. B 268:25–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Elle, O. 2003. Quantification of the integrative effect of ecotones as exemplified by the habitat choice of Blackcap and Whitethroat (Sylvia atricapilla and S. communis, Sylviidae). J. Ornithol. 144:271–283.Google Scholar
  19. Fahrig, L. 2003. Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 34:487–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Filippi-Codaccioni, O., V. Devictor, Y. Bas and R. Julliard. 2010. Toward more concern for specialisation and less for species diversity in conserving farmland biodiversity. Biol. Conserv. 143:1493–1500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Frank, B. and C. Battisti. 2005. Area effect on bird communities, guilds and species in a highly fragmented forest landscape of central Italy. Ital. J. Zool. 72:297–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fuller, R.J., D.E. Chamberlain, N.H.K. Burton and S.J. Gough. 2001. Distributions of birds in lowland agricultural landscapes of England and Wales: How distinctive are bird communities of hedgerows and woodland? Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 84:79–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gaston, K.J. 2010. Valuing common species. Science 327:154–155.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Gates, J.E. and L.W. Gysel. 1978. Avian nest dispersion and fledging success in field-forest ecotones. Ecology 59:871–883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gilbert-Norton, L., R. Wilson, J.R. Stevens and K.H. Beard. 2010. A meta-analytic review of corridor effectiveness. Conserv. Biol. 24:660–668.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Gregory, R.D., A. van Strien, P. Vorisek, A.W.G. Meyling, D.G. Noble, R.P.B. Foppen and D.W. Gibbons. 2005. Developing indicators for European birds. Philos. T. Roy. Soc. B 360:269–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gregory, R.D., P. Vorisek, A. van Strien, A.W.G. Meyling, F. Jiguet, L. Fornasari, J. Reif, P. Chylarecki and I.J. Burfield. 2007. Population trends of widespread woodland birds in Europe. Ibis 149:78–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Green, R.E., P.E. Osborne and E.J. Sears. 1994. The distribution of passerine birds in hedgerows during the breeding season in relation to characteristics of the hedgerow and adjacent farmland. J. Appl. Ecol. 31:677–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Herlin, I.L.S. and G.L.A. Fry. 2000. Dispersal of woody plants in forest edges and hedgerows in a Southern Swedish agricultural area: the role of site and landscape structure. Landscape Ecol. 15:229–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hinsley, S.A. and P.E. Bellamy. 2000. The influence of hedge structure, management and landscape context on the value of hedgerows to birds: A review. J. Environ. Manage. 60:33–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hothorn, T., F. Bretz and P. Westfall. 2008. Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biometrical J. 50:346–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Krebs, J.R. 1971. Territory and breeding in the Great Tit, Parus major L. Ecology 52:2–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Legendre, P. and E.D. Gallagher. 2001. Ecologically meaningful transformation for ordination of species data. Oecologia 129:271–280.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Lindenmayer, D.B. and J. Fischer. 2006. Habitat Fragmentation and Landscape Change: An Ecological and Conservation Synthesis. Island Press, Washington.Google Scholar
  35. McCollin, D. 1998. Forest edges and habitat selection in birds: a functional approach. Ecography 21:247–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Oksanen, J., F.G. Blanchet, R. Kindt, P. Legendre, P.R. Minchin, B. O’Hara, G.L. Simpson, P. Sólymos, M.H.H. Stevens and H. Wagner. 2010. The vegan package: community ecology package. R package version 2.0-2. URL: http://cran.R-pro-ject.org/package=vegan
  37. Perkins, A.J., M.J. Whittingham, A.J. Morris and R.B. Bradbury. 2002. Use of field margins by foraging yellowhammers Em-beriza citrinella. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 93:413–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Peterson, A.P. 2002. Zoonomen Nomenclatural data. URL:http://www.zoonomen.net
  39. Pinheiro, J., D. Bates, S. DebRoy, D. Sarkar and the R Core team. 2011. The nlme package: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3.1–102. URL: http://cran.r-pro-ject.org/src/contrib/Descriptions/nlme.html
  40. Pollard, E., M.D. Hooper and N.W. Moore. 1974. Hedges. William Collins Sons & Co Ltd, London.Google Scholar
  41. Puckett, H.L., J.R. Brandle, R.J. Johnson and E.E. Blankenship. 2009. Avian foraging patterns in crop field edges adjacent to woody habitat. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 131:9–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. R Development Core Team. 2011. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Version 2.13.2. Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL: http://www.R-project.org
  43. Sanderson, F.J., A. Kloch, K. Sachanowicz and P.F. Donald. 2009. Predicting the effects of agricultural change on farmland bird populations in Poland. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 129:37–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Seybold, S. 2009. Flora von Deutschland und angrenzender Länder. Quelle and Meyer, Heidelberg & Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
  45. Siriwardena, G. M., N. A. Calbrade and J.A. Vickery. 2008. Farmland birds and late winter food: does seed supply fail to meet demand? Ibis 150:585–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sparks, T.H., T. Parish and S.A. Hinsley. 1996 Breeding birds in field boundaries in an agricultural landscape. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 60: 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tucker, G.M. and M.F. Heath. 1994. Birds in Europe: Their Conservation Status. BirdLife, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  48. Villard, M.-A., M.K. Trzcinski and G. Merriam. 1999. Fragmentation effects on forest birds: relative influence of woodland cover and configuration on landscape occupancy. Conserv. Biol. 13:774–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Walker, M.P., J.W. Dover, S.A. Hinsley and T.H. Sparks. 2005. Birds and green lanes: Breeding season bird abundance, territories and species richness. Biol. Conserv. 126:540–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Whittingham, M.J., J.R. Krebs, R.D. Swetnam, R.M. Thewlis, J.D. Wilson and R.P. Freckleton. 2009. Habitat associations of British breeding farmland birds. Bird Study 56:43–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest 2012

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Batáry
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • A. Kovács-Hostyánszki
    • 1
    • 3
  • C. Fischer
    • 1
    • 4
  • T. Tscharntke
    • 1
  • A. Holzschuh
    • 1
    • 5
  1. 1.AgroecologyGeorg-August UniversityGöttingenGermany
  2. 2.MTA-ELTE-MTM Ecology Research GroupBudapestHungary
  3. 3.Ecosystem Services Research GroupInstitute of Ecology and Botany, Centre for Ecological Research, HASVácrátótHungary
  4. 4.Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape ResearchMünchebergGermany
  5. 5.Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical BiologyUniversity of WürzburgWürzburgGermany

Personalised recommendations