Similarity between grassland vegetation and seed bank shifts with altered precipitation and clipping, but not warming
Similarity between seed bank and aboveground vegetation is frequently studied in order to better understand how community composition is affected by factors such as disturbance and succession. Grassland plant communities are known to be sensitive to shifts in precipitation and increases in temperature associated with climate change, but we do not know if and how these factors interact to affect the similarity between seed bank and aboveground vegetation. Also unknown is how the impact of grazing, the dominant land-use in grasslands, will interact with climatic conditions to affect similarity. We manipulated precipitation and temperature, and cut vegetation (as a proxy for grazing) at a grassland site for three years. Percent cover of aboveground vegetation was estimated in the third year, and compared with persistent seed bank samples taken in the year prior from the same plots. Similarity increased with reduced precipitation, was unresponsive to warming, and decreased with clipping. The aboveground community responded strongly to the treatments, while the seed bank community did less so, suggesting similarity responses were largely driven by changes in aboveground vegetation. Because of the importance of the seed bank in vegetation regeneration, understanding the relationship between seed bank and aboveground vegetation will improve our understanding of plant community dynamics under climate change and varied management (grazing) intensities.
KeywordsDisturbance Global change Grazing Plant ecology Rangeland
Indicator Species Analysis
Open Top Chamber
NomenclatureUSDA, NRCS. 2011. The PLANTS Database (http://plants.usda.gov, 14 April 2011). National Plant Data Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70874-4490 USA
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Dufrene, M. and P. Legendre. 1997. Species assemblages and indicator species: The need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecol. Monogr. 67: 345–366.Google Scholar
- Harper, J. L. 1977. Population Biology of Plants. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
- Hayashi, I. and M. Numata. 1971. Viable buried-seed population in the Miscanthus and Zoysia type grasslands in Japan - ecological studies on the buried-seed population in the soil related to plant succession. Jap. J. Ecol. 20: 10.Google Scholar
- Howitt, R. W. 1988. Soil survey of the county of beaver. Alberta soil survey report No. 47. Alberta Research Council Open File Rep. 1987–4.Google Scholar
- Marion, G. M., G. H. R. Henry, D. W. Freckman, J. Johnstone, G. Jones, M. H. Jones, E. Levesque, U. Molau, P. Molgaard, A. N. Parsons, J. Svoboda and R. A. Virginia. 1997. Open-top designs for manipulating field temperature in high-latitude ecosystems. Global Change Biol. 3: 20–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- McCune, B., J. B. Grace, and J. P. Grime. 2002. Analysis of Ecological Communities. MjM Software Design, Oregon, USA.Google Scholar
- McCune, B. and M. J. Mefford. 2006. Pc-Ord multivariate analysis of ecological data. MjM Software Gleneden Beach. Oregon, USA.Google Scholar
- Milberg, P. 1992. Seed bank in a 35-year-old experiment with different treatments of a seminatural grassland. Acta Oecol. 13: 743–752.Google Scholar
- Milberg, P. and T. S. Persson. 1994. Soil seed bank and species recruitment in road verge grassland vegetation. Ann. Bot. Fenn. 31: 155–162.Google Scholar
- Oomes, M. J. M. and M. Ham. 1983. Some methods of determining the seed bank. Acta Bot. Neerl. 32: 244–244.Google Scholar
- Roberts, H. A. 1981. Seed banks in soils. Adv. Appl. Biol. 6: 1–55.Google Scholar
- Sims, P. L., and P. G. Risser. 2000. Grasslands. North American Terrestrial Vegetation, Second edition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
- Soil Classification Working Group. 1998. Canadian system of soil classification. Agriculture and Agri-food Canada, Ottawa, Ontario.Google Scholar
- Thompson, K., Bakker, JP and Bekker, R M. 1997. Soil Seed Banks of North-West Europe: Methodology, Density and Longevity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.