Advertisement

Community Ecology

, Volume 13, Issue 1, pp 88–96 | Cite as

How does plant species composition change from year to year? A case study from the herbaceous layer of a submediterranean oak woodland

  • E. Chaideftou
  • A. S. KallimanisEmail author
  • E. Bergmeier
  • P. Dimopoulos
Article
  • 2 Downloads

Abstract

Over millions of years there is a long-term increase in species richness, accompanied by substantial turnover in species composition. However, little is known about species temporal turnover over shorter, ecologically relevant time periods, such as years. In the present study, we examine the inter-annual temporal turnover in species composition in 100 m2 plots of the herbaceous layer in a submediterranean oak woodland over six years. We found that approximately half of the accumulated number of species over the six years is accommodated as temporal turnover. We also found that species temporal turnover in undisturbed control plots was not significantly different from that in plots where vegetation was recovering naturally without assistance, i.e., plots undergoing ecological succession. Only in the most disturbed (continuously overgrazed) plots temporal turnover was low to non-existent. We therefore suggest that diversity estimates based on a single year of observations may seriously underestimate species richness or the detrimental effects of disturbance, at least at the 100 m2 scale. Furthermore, we found that, with the exception of the heavily grazed plots, short-lived species (annuals and biennials) did not display significantly greater temporal turnover than long-lived (perennial) species. Our analysis also supports that the space for time substitution applies in the patterns of species turnover. Spatial species turnover was comparable to temporal turnover. Species that are observed in many plots are also present in many years, and vice versa. Also, the similarity in species composition decreased as the time period between observations increased, as is the case with distance decay. Overall we conclude that the patterns of species turnover in time resemble those in space, and thus temporal turnover makes an important contribution to total biodiversity that should not be ignored.

Keywords

Community assembly Distance decay Disturbance Space for time substitution Succession Thermophilous oak woodland Vegetation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Supplementary material

42974_2012_13010088_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (152 kb)
Supplementary material, approximately 155 KB.

References

  1. Adler, P.B. 2004. Neutral fail models to reproduce observed species-area and species-time relationships in Kansas grasslands. Ecology 85: 1265–1272.Google Scholar
  2. Alarcón, R., N.M. Waser and J. Ollerton. 2008. Year-to-year variation in the topology of a plant-pollinator interaction network. Oikos 117: 1796–1807.Google Scholar
  3. Archaux, F., F. Gosselin, L. Bergès and R. Chevalier. 2006. Effects of sampling time, species richness and observer on the exhaustiveness of plant censuses. J. Veg. Sci. 17: 299–306.Google Scholar
  4. Bakker, J.P., H. Olff, J.H. Willems and M. Zobel. 1996. Why do we need permanent plots in the study of long-term vegetation dynamics? J. Veg. Sci. 7: 147–156.Google Scholar
  5. Benton, M.J. 1995. Diversification and extinction in the history of life. Science 268: 52–58.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bergmeier, E. and P. Dimopoulos. 2008. Identifying plant communities of thermophilous deciduous forests in Greece: species composition, distribution, ecology and syntaxonomy. Plant Biosyst. 142: 228–254.Google Scholar
  7. Bornkamm, R. 2006. Fifty years vegetation development of a xerothermic calcareous grassland in Central Europe after heavy disturbance. Flora 201: 249–267.Google Scholar
  8. Brown, J.H., S.K. Morgan Ernest, J.M. Parody and J.P. Haskell. 2001. Regulation of diversity: maintenance of species richness in changing environments. Oecologia 126: 321–332.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Chaideftou, E., C.A. Thanos, E. Bergmeier, A.S. Kallimanis and P. Dimopoulos. 2009. Seed bank composition and above-ground vegetation in response to grazing in sub-Mediterranean oak forests NW Greece. Plant Ecol. 201: 255–265.Google Scholar
  10. Chaideftou, E., C.A. Thanos, E. Bergmeier, A.S. Kallimanis and P. Dimopoulos. 2011. The herb layer restoration potential of the soil seed bank in an overgrazed oak forest. J. Biol. Res. 15: 47– 57.Google Scholar
  11. Chytrý, M., I. Sedláková and L. Tichý. 2001. Species richness and species turnover in a successional heathland. App. Veg. Sci. 4: 89–96.Google Scholar
  12. Crist, T.O. and J. A. Veech. 2006. Additive partitioning of rarefaction curves and species area relationships, unifying α-, β- and γ-di-versity with sample size and habitat area. Ecol. Lett. 9: 923–932.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. DeLuca, T.H., M.C., Nilsson and O., Zackrisson. 2002. Nitrogen mineralization and phenol accumulation along a fire chronose-quence in northern Sweden. Oecologia 133: 206–214.Google Scholar
  14. Dierschke, H. 2009. Vegetationsdynamik eines gezäunten naturna-hen Kalkbuchenwaldes – Vergleich von Vegetationsaufnahmen 1980 und 2001. Forstarchiv 80 (5): 143–150.Google Scholar
  15. Dierschke, H. 2010. Über 80 Jahre wissenschaftliche Begleitung pflanzensoziologischer Feldforschung in Mitteleuropa. Über-sicht der in den Mitteilungen und in Tuexenia publizierten Vegetationsaufnahmen (1928–2009). Tuexenia 30: 319–348.Google Scholar
  16. Dölle, M., M. Bernhardt-Römermann, A. Path and W. Schmidt. 2008. Changes in life history trait composition during undisturbed old-field succession. Flora 203: 508–522Google Scholar
  17. Geisselbrecht-Taferner, L., J., Geisselbrecht and L., Mucina. 1997. Fine-scale spatial population patterns and mobility of winter-annual herbs in a dry grassland. J. Veg. Sci. 8: 209–216.Google Scholar
  18. Guarino, R. and V. Ilardi 2009. An ‘uncertainty principle’ for the Mediterranean annual dry grasslands. In: S. Coles and P. Dimopoulos (eds.), Book of abstracts of the 52nd IAVS symposium, Chania, Greece. p. 54.Google Scholar
  19. Herben, T., and H.J. During. 1995. Spatiotemporal dynamics in mountain grasslands- species autocorrelations in space and time. Folia Geobot. Phytotax. 30: 185–196.Google Scholar
  20. Herben, T., F., Krahulec, V., Hadincová and M., Kovérova. 1993a. Small-scale spatial dynamics of plant species in a grassland community over six years. J. Veg. Sci. 4: 171–178.Google Scholar
  21. Herben, T., F., Krahulec, V., Hadincová and H., Skálová. 1993b. Small-scale variability as a mechanism for large-scale stability in mountain grasslands. J. Veg. Sci. 4: 163–170.Google Scholar
  22. Johnson, E.A. and K. Miyanishi. 2008. Testing the assumptions of chronosequences in succession. Ecol. Lett. 11: 419–431.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Jonzen, N., P., Lundberg, E., Ranta and V. Kaitala. 2001. The irreducible uncertainty of the demography-environment interaction in ecology. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269: 221–225.Google Scholar
  24. Kallimanis, A.S., J.M. Halley, D. Vokou and S.P. Sgardelis. 2008. The scale of analysis determines the spatial pattern of woody species diversity in the Mediterranean environment. Plant Ecol. 196: 143–151.Google Scholar
  25. Kallimanis, A.S., M., Panitsa, E., Bergmeier and P., Dimopoulos. 2011. Examining the relationship between total species richness and single island palaeo- and neo-endemics. Acta Oecol. 37: 65– 70.Google Scholar
  26. Kirby, K.J., T., Bines, A., Burn, J., Mackintosh, P., Pitkin and I. Smith. 1986. Seasonal and observer differences in vascular plant records from british woodlands. J. Ecol. 74: 123–131.Google Scholar
  27. Klimeš, L. 1999. Small-scale plant mobility in a species-rich grassland. J. Veg. Sci. 10: 209–218.Google Scholar
  28. Koleff, P., K.J. Gaston and J.J. Lennon. 2003. Measuring beta diversity for presence-absence data. J. Anim. Ecol. 72: 367–382.Google Scholar
  29. Krebs, C.J. 2001. Ecology: The Experimental Analysis of Distribution and Abundance, 5th ed. Benjamin Cummings, San Francisco, USA.Google Scholar
  30. Law, B.E., O.J. Sun, J. Campbell, S. Van Tuyl and P.E. Thornton. 2003. Changes in carbon storage and fluxes in a chronosequence of ponderosa pine. Glob. Change Biol. 9: 510–524.Google Scholar
  31. Magurran, A.E. 2008. Diversity over time. Fol. Geobot .43: 319–327.Google Scholar
  32. McElwain, J.C. and S.W. Punyasena. 2007. Mass extinction events and the plant fossil record. Trends Ecol. Evol. 22: 548–557.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Milberg, P. and M.L. Hansson. 1993. Soil seed bank and species turnover in a limestone grassland. J. Veg. Sci. 5: 35–42.Google Scholar
  34. Nygaard, P.H. and T. Ødegaard. 1999. Sixty years of vegetation dynamics in a south boreal coniferous forest in southern Norway. J. Veg. Sci. 10: 5–16.Google Scholar
  35. Økland, R.H. 1994a. Bryophyte and lichen persistence patterns in a Norwegian boreal coniferous forest. Lindbergia 19: 50–62.Google Scholar
  36. Økland, R.H. 1994b. Patterns of bryophyte associations at different scales in a Norwegian boreal spruce forest. J.Veg.Sci. 5:127– 138.Google Scholar
  37. Økland, R.H. 1995. Small-scale species dynamics in semi-arid steppe vegetation in Inner Mongolia. J. Veg. Sci. 6: 583–592.Google Scholar
  38. Palmer, M.W. 2005. Distance decay in an old-growth neotropical forest. J. Veg. Sci. 16: 161–166.Google Scholar
  39. Palmer, M.W. and G.M., Rusch. 2001. How fast is the carousel? Direct indices of species mobility with examples from an Oklahoma grassland. J. Veg. Sci. 12: 305–318.Google Scholar
  40. Parody, J.M., F.J. Cuthbert and E.H. Decker. 2001. The effect of 50 years of landscape change on species richness and community composition. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 10: 305–313.Google Scholar
  41. Pärtel, M. and M. Zobel. 1995. Small-scale dynamics and species richness in successional alvar plant communities. Ecography 18: 83–90.Google Scholar
  42. Petanidou, T., A.S. Kallimanis, J. Tzanopoulos, S.P. Sgardelis and J.D. Pantis. 2008. Long-term observation of a pollination network, Fluctuation in species and interactions, relative invariance of network structure and implications for estimates of specialization. Ecol. Lett. 11: 564–575.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Pickett, S.T.A. 1982. Population patterns through twenty years of oldfield succession. Vegetatio 49: 5–59.Google Scholar
  44. Ricotta, C. 2008. Computing additive β-diversity from presence and absence scores, a critique and alternative parameters. Theor. Pop. Biol. 73: 244–249Google Scholar
  45. Rusch, G. and E. van der Maarel. 1992. Species turnover and seedling recruitment in limestone grasslands. Oikos 63: 139–146.Google Scholar
  46. Scott, W.A. and C.J. Hallam. 2002. Assessing species misidentification rates through quality assurance of vegetation monitoring. Plant Ecol. 165: 101–115.Google Scholar
  47. Sluis, W.J. 2002. Patterns of species richness and composition in re-created grassland. Restor. Ecol. 10: 1–8.Google Scholar
  48. Travis, S.E. and M.W. Hester. 2005. A space-for-time substitution reveals the long-term decline in genotypic diversity of a widespread salt marsh plant, Spartina alterniflora, over a span of 1500 years. J. Ecol. 93: 417–430Google Scholar
  49. Tsaliki, M., E. Bergmeier, and P. Dimopoulos. 2005. Vegetation patterns and plant diversity in mixed oak woodlands in the region of Bourazani, Epirus NW Greece. Botanica Chronica 18: 225– 251.Google Scholar
  50. Tuomisto, H. 2010. A diversity of beta diversities, straightening up a concept gone awry. Part 1. Defining beta diversity as a function of alpha and gamma diversity. Ecography 33: 2–22.Google Scholar
  51. van der Maarel, E. and M.T. Sykes. 1993. Small scale plant species turnover in a limestone grassland, the carousel model and some comments on the niche concept. J. Veg. Sci. 4: 179–188.Google Scholar
  52. van der Maarel, E. and M.T. Sykes. 1997. Rates of small-scale species mobility in alvar limestone grassland. J. Veg. Sci. 8: 199– 208.Google Scholar
  53. Vitousek, P.M., D.R., Turner and K., Kitayama. 1995. Foliar nutrients during long-term soil development in Hawaiian montane rain forest. Ecology 76: 712–720.Google Scholar
  54. White, E.P. 2004. Two-phase species-time relationships in North American land birds. Ecol. Lett. 7: 329–336.Google Scholar
  55. White, E.P., P.B. Adler, W.K. Lauenroth, R.A. Gill, D. Greenberg, D.M. Kaufman, A. Rassweiler, J.A. Rusak, M.D. Smith, J.R. Steinbeck, R.B. Waide and J. Yao. 2006. A comparison of the species-time relationship across ecosystems and taxonomic groups. Oikos 112: 185–195.Google Scholar
  56. Zhang, W. and C., Skarpe. 1995. Small-scale species dynamics in semi-arid steppe vegetation in Inner Mongolia. J. Veg. Sci. 6: 583–592.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest 2012

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. Chaideftou
    • 1
  • A. S. Kallimanis
    • 1
    Email author
  • E. Bergmeier
    • 2
  • P. Dimopoulos
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Environmental and Natural Resources ManagementUniversity of IoanninaAgrinioGreece
  2. 2.Albrecht von Haller Institute of Plant SciencesGeorg-August University of GöttingenGöttingenGermany

Personalised recommendations