Community Ecology

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 67–77 | Cite as

Effects of small canopy gaps on boreal mixedwood understory vegetation dynamics

  • L. De GrandpréEmail author
  • D. Boucher
  • Y. Bergeron
  • D. Gagnon


Boreal mixedwood understory communities are highly dynamic because they are simultaneously influenced by canopy succession, small-scale environmental variation and disturbances. In such a system, fire initiates succession but canopy gaps, resulting from spruce budworm outbreaks or other disturbances, also affect forest dynamics during succession. In this study, we assessed the short-term response of understory communities along a canopy gap severity gradient in mature and old-growth forest stands. The objective was to determine if resource heterogeneity is driving understory community composition and diversity. We created artificial gaps of varying severities in stands of two late successional forest stages. Four treatments, i.e., total cut, conifer cut, girdling of conifers and a control treatment, were each applied over an area of 100 m2 and replicated three times in both types of forest stands. The cover of each understory species was measured before treatment application and 1, 2 and 11 years following it, in seven 1 m2 plots per replicate.Percent transmission of photosynthetic photon flux density and soil temperature were also measured on different occasions after the beginning of the experiment. Species richness, alpha diversity and total cover all increased following gap creation, and this increase was sustained up to 11 years. Increases were more pronounced in total cut than in other treatments. The increase in species richness and diversity was also more pronounced in old-growth stands, while total cover increase was greater in mature stands. Gap creation resulted in significant changes in abundance patterns that were associated with the resident species assemblages. The magnitude of changes in community composition did not significantly differ between mature and old-growth forests and differences in species composition among stands were maintained following gap creation. This study supports the evidence that resource heterogeneity resulting from small-scale disturbances will contribute to maintaining diversity among understory communities by allowing species more typical of early-successional communities to coexist with species from late-successional ones. Such a process may be essential for maintaining the species pool likely to re-invade the stands following major disturbances.


Alpha and beta diversity Boreal forest Canopy gaps Old-growth forests Mature forests Resource heterogeneity Small-scale disturbance Understory plant communities 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Supplementary material

42974_2011_12010067_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (10 kb)
Supplementary material, approximately 11 KB.


  1. Bartels, S. and H. Chen. 2010. Is understory plant species diversity driven by resource quantity or resource heterogeneity? Ecology 91:1931–1938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bergeron, Y. 1991. The influence of island and mainland lakeshore landscapes on boreal forest fire regimes. Ecology 72:1980–1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bergeron, Y. and D. Charron. 1994. Postfire stand dynamics in a southern boreal forest (Québec): a dendroecological approach. Ecoscience 1:173–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bergeron, Y. and M. Dubuc. 1989. Succession in the southern part of the Canadian boreal forest. Vegetatio 79:51–63.Google Scholar
  5. Bergeron, Y., A. Leduc, H. Morin and C. Joyal. 1995. Balsam fir mortality following the last spruce budworm outbreak in northwestern Quebec. Can. J. Forest Res. 25:1375–1384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bonan, G.B. and H.H. Shugart. 1989. Environmental factors and ecological processes in boreal forests. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 20: 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carleton, T.J. and P.F. Maycock. 1981. Understorey-canopy affinities in boreal forest vegetation. Can. J.Bot. 59:1709–1716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carleton, T.J. and P.F. Maycock. 1980. Vegetation of the boreal forests south of James Bay: non-centered component analysisof the vascular flora. Ecology 61:1199–1212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Côté, L., S. Brown,D. Paré, J.W. Fyles and J. Bauhus. 2000. Dynamics of carbon and nitrogen mineralization in relation to stand type, stand age, and soil texture in the boreal mixedwood. Soil Biol. Biochem. 32:1079–1090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dansereau, P.-R. and Y. Bergeron. 1993. Fire history in the southern boreal forest of northwestern Quebec.Can. J. Forest Res. 23:25– 32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. De Grandpré, L. and Y. Bergeron. 1997. Diversity and stability of understorey communities following disturbance in the southern boreal forest. J. Ecol. 85:777–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. De Grandpé, L., D. Gagnon and Y. Bergeron. 1993. Changes in the understory of Canadian southern boreal forest after fire. J. Veg. Sci. 4:803–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Environment Canada. 2005. Canadian Climate Normals or Averages 1971–2000. URL: Scholar
  14. Eriksson, O. and L. Jerling. 1990. Hierarchical selection and risk spreading in clonal plants. In: J. van Groenendael and H. deGoogle Scholar
  15. Frelich, L.E. and P.B. Reich. 1999. Neighborhood effects, disturbance severity, and community stability in forests. Ecosystems 2:151–166.Google Scholar
  16. Gilliam, F.S. and M.R. Roberts. 2003. The Herbaceous Layer in Forests of Eastern North America. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.Google Scholar
  17. Halpern, C.B. 1989. Early successional patterns of forest species: interactions of life history traits and disturbance. Ecology 70:704–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hart, S.A. and H.Y.H. Chen. 2008. Fire, logging, and overstory affect understory abundance, diversity, and composition in boreal forest. Ecol. Monogr. 78:123–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hart, S.A. and H.Y.H. Chen. 2006. Understory vegetation dynamics of North American boreal forests. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 25:381– 397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hugues, J.W. and T.J. Fahey. 1991. Colonization dynamics of herbs and shrubs in a disturbed northern hardwood forest. J. Ecol. 79:605–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hutchings, M.J. and M. Mogie. 1990. The spatial structure of clonal plants control and consequences. In: J. van Groenendael and H. de Kroon (eds.), Clonal Growth in Plants. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague. pp. 57–76.Google Scholar
  22. Jonsson, B.G. and P.-A. Esseen. 1990. Treefall disturbance maintains high bryophyte diversity in a boreal spruce forest. J. Ecol. 78:924–936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jost, L. 2007. Partitioning diversity into independent alpha and beta components. Ecology 88:2427–2439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kemball, K.J., G.G. Wang and Q.-L. Dang. 2005. Response of un-derstory plant community of boreal mixedwood stands to fire, logging, and spruce budworm outbreak. Can. J. Bot. 83:1550– 1560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kenward, M. G. and J.H. Roger. 1997. Small sample inference for fixed effects from restricted maximum likelihood. Biometrics 53:983–997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kneeshaw, D.D. and Y. Bergeron. 1998. Canopy gap characteristics and tree replacement in the southeastern boreal forest. Ecology 79:783–794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kneeshaw, D., Y. Bergeron and L. De Grandpré. 1998. Early response of Abies balsamea seedlings to artificially created openings. J. Veg. Sci. 9:543–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Légaré, S., Y. Bergeron and D. Paré. 2002. Influence of forest composition on understory cover of boreal mixedwood forests of western Quebec, Canada. Silva Fenn. 36:353–366. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Legendre, P. and L. Legendre. 1998. Numerical Ecology, Second English Edition. Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  30. Morin, H., D. Laprise, and Y. Bergeron. 1993. Chronology of spruce budworm outbreaks near Lake Duparquet, Abitibi region, Quebec. Can. J. Forest Res. 23:1497–1506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Noble, I.R. and R.O. Slatyer. 1980. The use of vital attributes to predict successional changes in plant communities subject to recurrent disturbances. Vegetatio 43:5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Økland, R.H. 2000. Understorey vegetation development in North Finnish Picea forests after disturbance: re-analysis of Sirén’s data. J. Veg. Sci. 11:533–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Økland, R.H. and O. Eilertsen. 1996. Dynamics of understory vegetation in an old-growth boreal coniferous forest, 1988–1993. J. Veg. Sci. 7:747–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Økland, R.H., K. Rydgren and T. Økland. 2003. Plant species composition of boreal spruce swamp forests: closed doors and windows of opportunity. Ecology 84:1909–1919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Oksanen, J., F. Guillaume Blanchet, R. Kindt, P. Legendre, R.B. O’Hara, G.L. Simpson, P. Solymos, M.H.H. Stevens and H. Wagner 2010. vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package, version 1.17–4.
  36. Paré, D. and Y. Bergeron. 1996. Effect of colonizing tree species on soil nutrient availability in a clay soil of the boreal mixedwood. Can. J. Forest Res. 26:1022–1031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Parent, S. and C. Messier. 1996. A simple and efficient method to estimate microsite light availability under a forest canopy. Can. J. Forest Res. 26:151–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rees, D.C. and G.P. Juday. 2002. Plant species diversity on logged versus burned sites in central Alaska. Forest Ecol. Manage. 155:291–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Reyes, G.P., D. Kneeshaw, L. De Grandpré and A. Leduc. 2010. Changes in woody vegetation abundance and diversity after natural disturbances causing different levels of mortality. J. Veg. Sci. 21:406–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rich, R.L., L.E. Frelich and P.B. Reich. 2007. Wind-throw mortality in the southern boreal forest: effects of species, diameter and stand age. J. Ecol. 95:1261–1273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Roberts, M.R. 2004. Response of the herbaceous layer to natural disturbance in North American forests. Can. J. Bot. 82:1273–1283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rowe, J.S. 1983. Concepts of fire effects on plant individuals and species. In: R.W. Wein and D.A. MacLean (eds.), The Role of Fire in Northern Circumpolar Ecosystems. Scope, Vol. 18. Wiley, New York. pp. 135–144.Google Scholar
  43. Rydgren, K., G. Hestmark and R.H. Økland. 1998. Revegetation following experimental disturbance in a boreal old-growth Picea abies forest. J. Veg. Sci. 9:763–776. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rydgren, K., R.H. Økland and G. Hestmark. 2004. Disturbance severity and community resilience in a boreal forest. Ecology 85 :1906–1915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. SAS Institute Inc. 2002. SAS/STAT® User’s Guide, Version 9.1. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.Google Scholar
  46. Saucier, J.-P., J.-F. Bergeron, P. Grondin and A. Robitaille. 1998. Les régions écologiques du Québec méridional (3e version) : un des éléments du système hiérarchique de classification écolo-gique du territoire mis au point par le ministère des Ressources naturelles du Québec. L’Aubelle 124:S1–S12.Google Scholar
  47. Schwarz, P.A., T.J. Fahey and C.E. McCulloch. 2003. Factors controlling spatial variation of tree species abundance in a forested landscape. Ecology 84:1862–1878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Takafumi, H. and T. Hiura. 2009. Effects of disturbance history and environmental factors on the diversity and productivity of un-derstory vegetation in a cool-temperate forest in Japan. Forest Ecol. Manage. 257:843–857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Taylor, S.J., T.J. Carleton and P. Adams. 1987. Understorey vegetation change in a Picea mariana chronosequence. Vegetatio 73:63–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tessier, J.T. 2007. Re-establishment of three dominant herbaceous understory species following fine-scale disturbance in a Catskill northern hardwood forest. J. Torrey Bot. Soc. 134:34–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Thomas, S.C., C.B. Halpern, D.A. Falk, D.A. Liguori and K.A. Austin. 1999. Plant diversity in managed forests: understory responses to thinning and fertilization. Ecol. Appl. 9:864–879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Veillette, J.J. 1994. Evolution and paleohydrology of glacial Lakes Barlow and Ojibway. Quaternary Sci. Rev. 13: 945–971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest 2011

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. De Grandpré
    • 1
    Email author
  • D. Boucher
    • 1
  • Y. Bergeron
    • 2
  • D. Gagnon
    • 3
  1. 1.Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest ServiceStn. Sainte-Foy, Québec, QCCanada
  2. 2.NSERC-UQAM-UQATIndustrial Chair in Sustainable Forest Management, Université du Québec en Abitibi-TémiscamingueRouyn-Noranda, QCCanada
  3. 3.Centre d’étude de laforȩtUniversité du Québec à MontréalSucc. Centre-Ville, Montréal, QCCanada

Personalised recommendations