Community Ecology

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 51–57 | Cite as

Density and spatial pattern of nests in sub-Mediterranean ground-dwelling ant communities (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)

  • G. LőrincziEmail author


The density and spatial pattern of ant nests were examined in two sub-Mediterranean habitats of the Balaton Uplands in Hungary. The aim of this study was to examine whether regular spatial arrangement, the most common dispersion pattern among ants that mostly indicates competition, is a characteristic feature of these communities. In both habitats, the nests of Aphaenogaster subterranea and Lasius emarginatus had the highest density, followed by the nests of Prenolepis nitens and Temnothorax crassispinus, which were also frequent. The intraspecific spacing pattern of nests was random or aggregated in most cases, and when the species identity of the nearest neighbour was disregarded, the nests of all the individual species showed significant aggregation. The nearest interspecific inter-nest distances proved to be significantly shorter than the nearest intraspecific inter-nest distances both in the case of the entire community and the majority of individual species, except for the polydomous L. emarginatus. On the basis of the results it seems that neither intra-, nor interspecific competition may be an important process in the formation of nest spacing patterns in these habitats.


Ants Competition Distribution pattern Formicidae Nest density 



Clark and Evans’ index


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adams, E. S. and Tschinkel, W. R. 1995. Spatial dynamics of colony interactions in young populations of the fire ant Solenopsis in-victa. Oecologia 102: 156–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Albuquerque, E. Z. de, Diehl-Fleig, E. and Diehl, E. 2005. Density and distribution of nests of Mycetophylax simplex (Emery) (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) in areas with mobile dunes on the northern coast of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.Rev. Bras. Entomol. 49: 123–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bernstein, R. A. and Gobbel, M. 1979. Partitioning of space in communities of ants. J. Animal Ecol. 48: 931–942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bregant, E. 1998. Zur Biologie und Verbreitung der Honigameise Prenolepis nitens (Mayr, 1852) in Österreich (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrmecologische Nachrichten 2: 14–18.Google Scholar
  5. Brown, M. J. F. 1999. Nest relocation and encounters between colonies of the seed-harvesting ant Messor andrei. Insectes Sociaux 46: 66–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clark, P. J. and Evans, F. C. 1954. Distance to nearest neighbor as a measure of spatial relationships in populations. Ecology 35: 445–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cole, B. J., Haight, K. and Wiernaz,D. C. 2001. Distribution of Myr-mecocystus mexicanus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): Association with Pogonomyrmex occidentalis (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Amer. 94: 59–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cushman, J. H., Martinsen, G. D. and Mazeroll, A. I. 1988. Density-and size-dependent spacing of ant nests: evidence for intraspe-cific competition. Oecologia 77: 522–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Czechowski, W., Radchenko, A. and Czechowska, W. 2002. The ants (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) of Poland. MIZ PAS, Warszawa, 200 pp.Google Scholar
  10. Doncaster, C. P. 1981. The spatial distribution of ants’ nests on Ramsey Island, South Wales. J. Animal Ecol. 50: 195–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dugas, D. P. 2001. The influence of arroyo edges on Pogonomyrmex rugosus nest distribution in the Chihuahuan Desert, New Mexico. J. Arid Environ. 47: 153–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Elmes, G. W. 1974. The spatial distribution of a population of two ant species living in limestone grassland. Pedobiol. 14: 412–418.Google Scholar
  13. Franks, N. R., Dornhaus, A., Hitchcock, G., Guillem, R., Hooper, J. and Webb, C. 2007. Avoidance of conspecific colonies during nest choice by ants. Animal Behav. 73: 525–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gallé, L. 1975. Factors stabilizing the ant populations (Hymenop-tera: Formicidae) in the grass associations of the Tisza Basin. Tiscia 10: 61–66.Google Scholar
  15. Gallé, L. 1980. Dispersion of high density ant populations in sandy soil grassland ecosystems. Acta Biol. 26: 129–135.Google Scholar
  16. Gallé, L., Kovács, É. and Hevér, A. 1994. Pattern transformation of ant colonies in a succesional sandy grassland. Memorabilia Zoologica 48: 81–90.Google Scholar
  17. Gordon, D. M.1992. Nest relocation in harvester ants.Ann. Entomol. Soc. Amer. 85: 44–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Herbers, J. M. 1989. Community structure in north temperate ants: temporal and spatial variation. Oecologia 81: 201–211.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Herbers, J. M. 1994. Structure of an Australian ant community with comparisons to North American counterparts (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Sociobiology 24: 293–306.Google Scholar
  20. Hölldobler, B. 1976. Recruitment behavior, home range orientation and territoriality in harvester ants. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 1: 3– 44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hölldobler, B. and Wilson, E. O. 1990. The Ants. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  22. Levings, S. C. and Franks, N. R. 1982. Patterns of nest dispersion in a tropical ground ant community. Ecology 63: 338–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Levings, S. C. and Traniello, J. F. A. 1981. Territoriality, nest dispersion, and community structure in ants. Psyche 88: 265–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McGlynn, T. P., Carr, R. A., Carson, J. H. and Buma, J. 2004. Frequent nest relocation in the ant Aphaenogaster araneoides: resources, competition, and natural enemies. Oikos 196: 611–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. R Development Core Team 2007. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL
  26. Röszler, P. 1937. Biologie der Honigameise (Prenolepis imparis v. nitens Mayr.). Entomologische Rundschau 54: 207–380.Google Scholar
  27. Ryti, R. T. 1991. Theoretical considerations of density-dependent spacing of a mound-building ant (Formica altipetens). J.Theor. Biol. 147: 289–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ryti, R. T. and Case, T. J. 1984. Spatial arrangement and diet overlap between colonies of desert ants. Oecologia 62: 401–404.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Ryti, R. T. and Case, T. J. 1986. Overdispersion of ant colonies: a test of hypotheses. Oecologia 69: 446–453.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Ryti, R. T. and Case, T. J. 1992. The role of neighborhood competition in the spacing and diversity of ant communities. Amer. Nat. 139: 355–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Savolainen, R. and Vepsäläinen, K. 1988. A competition hierarchy between boreal ants: impact on resource partitioning and community structure. Oikos 51: 135–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Savolainen, R. and Vepsäläinen, K. 1989. Niche differentiation of ants species within territories of the wood ant Formica polyctena. Oikos 56: 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schooley, R. L. and Wiens, J. A. 2003. Spatial patterns, density dependence, and demography in the harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex rugosus, in semiarid grasslands. J. Arid Environ. 53: 183–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Seifert, B. 1996. Ameisen: beobachten, bestimmen. Naturbuch-Ver-lag, Augsburg.Google Scholar
  35. Seifert, B. 2007. Die Ameisen Mittel- und Nordeuropas. Lutra Ver-lags- und Vertriebsgesellschaft, Görlitz.Google Scholar
  36. Smallwood, J. 1982. Nest relocations in ants. Insectes Sociaux 29: 138–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Smallwood, J. and Culver, D. C. 1979. Colony movements of some North American ants. J.Animal Ecol. 48: 373–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Soares, S. M. and Schoereder, J. H. 2001. Ant-nest distribution in a remnant of tropical rainforest in southeastern Brazil. Insectes Sociaux 48: 280–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. SPSS for Windows, Rel. 11.5.0 2002. Chicago: SPSS Inc.Google Scholar
  40. Sudd, J. H., Douglas, J. M., Gaynard, T., Murray, D. M. and Stock-dale, J. M. 1977. The distribution of wood-ants (Formica lugubris Zetterstedt) in a northern English forest. Ecol. Entomol. 2:301–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tamás, J. 2003. History of Austrian pine plantations in Hungary. ActaBot. Croat. 62: 147–158.Google Scholar
  42. Traniello, J. F. A. and Levings, S. C. 1986. Intra- and intercolony patterns of nest dispersion in the ant Lasius neoniger: correlations with territoriality and foraging ecology. Oecologia 69: 413–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Vasconcellos, A., Santana, G. and Souza, A. K. 2004. Nest spacing and architecture, and swarming of males of Dinoponera quadriceps (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) in a remnant of the Atlantic forest in northeast Brazil. Braz. J. Biol. 64: 357–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Vepsäläinen, K. and Pisarski, B. 1982. Assembly of island ant communities. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 19: 327–335.Google Scholar
  45. Vörös, G. and Gallé, L. 2002. Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) as primary pests in Hungary: Recent observations. Tiscia 33: 31–35.Google Scholar
  46. Waloff, N. and Blackith, R. E. 1962. The growth and distribution of the mounds of Lasius flavus (Fabricius) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Silkwood Park, Berkshire. J. Animal Ecol. 31: 421– 437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Warburg, I. and Steinberger, Y. 1997. On the spatial distribution of nests of the ants Messor arenarius and Messor ebeninus. J.Arid Environ. 36: 671–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest 2011

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EcologyUniversity of SzegedSzegedHungary

Personalised recommendations