Dependence of animal diversity on plant diversity and environmental factors in farmland ponds

Abstract

Farmland ponds represent habitats with a high conservation value that make a significant contribution to regional biodiversity. Understanding the influence of plant species composition and environmental variables in driving variations in animal species composition in ponds is an important issue in the fields of ecological research and conservation biology. Using variance partitioning techniques to quantify independent effects, we examined how plant species composition, local-landscape configuration and physicochemical variables interact in influencing aquatic insect and amphibian community composition. The ponds investigated in this study were located in the Site of Community Importance - Special Protected Area (Natura 2000 Network) “Monte Labbro - Alta Valle dell’Albegna” (Tuscany, central Italy). Our results showed that: (i) plant community composition (such as Carex hirta, Gliceryafluitans, Potamogeton natans, Typha latifolia) is a good predictor for amphibian but not for aquatic insect species composition; (ii) aquatic insect species composition was more strongly affected by the landscape context, whereas for amphibians the local characteristics of the ponds were determining; (iii) the physicochemical context is a poor predictor for these animal taxa; (iv) lastly, and notably, the explanatory variables explained a high proportion of the total variation in amphibian and aquatic insect species composition. Our results have important implications with respect to the creation of new ponds, which should preferentially take place close to semi-natural grasslands and other wetlands, in order to maintain greater connectivity, and away from urban areas. Moreover, larger ponds are preferable for the preservation of pond biodiversity. The management and conservation of ponds is necessary to ensure the protection of habitats, the survival of individual species and overall pond biodiversity.

References

  1. Bacchi, I. and V.M. Rizzotti. 2007. Insecta Heteroptera Nepomorpha e Gerromorpha. In: S. Ruffo and F. Stoch (eds.), Checklist e distribuzione delle specie della fauna italiana. Memorie del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Verona, Sezione Scienze della Vita 16. pp. 147–149.

  2. Balletto, E. 2007. Amphibia e Reptilia. In: S. Ruffo and F. Stoch (eds.), Checklist e distribuzione delle specie della fauna italiana. Memorie del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Verona, Sezione Scienze della Vita 16. pp. 283–287.

  3. Belfiore, C. 1983. Guida per il riconoscimento delle specie animali delle acque interne italiane: Efemerotteri (Ephemeroptera). Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Roma.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Belfiore, C. 2007. Insecta Ephemeroptera. In: S. Ruffo and F. Stoch (eds.), Checklist e distribuzione delle specie della fauna italiana. Memorie del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Verona, Sezione Scienze della Vita 16. pp. 127–129.

  5. Biggs, J., A. Corfield, D. Walker, M. Whitfield, and P. Williams. 1994. New approaches to the management of ponds. British Wildlife 5: 273–287.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bilton, D.T.,A. Foggo and S.D. Rundle. 2001. Size, permanence and the proportion of predators in ponds. Archiv für Hydrobiologie 151: 451–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Blanchet, F.G.,P. Legendre and D. Borcard. 2008. Forward selection of explanatory variables. Ecology 89: 2623–2632.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Blaschke, T. 2010. Object based image analysis for remote sensing. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 65: 2–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Borcard, D., P. Legendre and P. Drapeau. 1992. Partialling out the spatial component of ecological variation. Ecology 73: 1045–1055.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Briers, R.A. and J. Biggs. 2003. Indicator taxa for the conservation of pond invertebrate diversity. Aquat. Conserv.: Mar. Freshwat. Ecosyst. 13: 323–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Carchini, G. 1983. Guida per il riconoscimento delle specie animali delle acque interne italiane: Odonati (Odonata). Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Roma.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Carchini, G., A.G. Solimini and A. Ruggiero. 2005. Habitat characteristics and odonate diversity in mountain ponds of central Italy. Aquat. Conserv.: Mar. Freshwat. Ecosyst. 15: 573–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cushman, S.A. and K. McGarigal. 2002. Hierarchical, multi-scale decomposition of species-environment relationships. Landscape Ecol. 17: 637–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Davies, B.R., J. Biggs, J.T. Lee and S. Thompson. 2004. Identifying optimum locations for new ponds. Aquat. Conserv.: Mar. Fresh-wat. Ecosyst. 14: 5–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Declerck, S., T. De Bie, D. Ercken, H. Hampel, S. Schrijvers, J. Van Wichelen, V. Gillard, R. Mandiki, B. Losson, D. Bauwens, S. Keijers, W. Vyverman, B. Goddeeris, L. De Meester, L. Brendonck and K. Martens. 2006. Ecological characteristics of small farmland ponds: Associations with land use practices at multiple spatial scales. Biol. Conserv. 131: 523–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. de Szalay, F.A. and V.H. Resh. 2000. Factors influencing macroinvertebrate colonization of seasonal wetlands: response to emergent plant cover. Freshwat. Biol. 45: 295–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Dray, S. 2004. Packfor. R package, Version 10.0-6.

  18. eConition. 2001. User guide. Definiens Imaging, Munich, Germany.

  19. European Environment Agency. 2000. CORINE Land Cover Technical - Guide Addendum 2000, EEA Copenhagen, Denmark.

  20. Fairchild, G.W., J.N. Anderson and D.J. Velinsky. 2005. The trophic state ‘chain of relationships’ in ponds: does size matter? Hydrobiologia 539: 35–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Feder, M.E., Burggren, W.W. (eds.) 1992. Environmental Physiology of the Amphibians. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Friday, L.E. 1987. The diversity of macroinvertebrate and macrophyte communities in ponds. Freshwat. Biol. 18: 87–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gee, J.H.R., B.D. Smith, K.M. Lee and W.S. Griffiths. 1997. The ecological basis of freshwater pond management for biodiversity. Aquat. Conserv.: Mar. Freshwat. Ecosyst. 7: 91–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gioria, M., A. Schaffers, G. Bacaro and J. Feehan. 2010. The conservation value of farmland ponds: Predicting water beetle assemblages using vascular plants as surrogate group. Biol. Conserv. 143: 1125–1133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Grasshoff, K., M. Ehrhardt and K. Kremling. 1999. Methods of Seawater Analysis. Verlag Chemie, Weinheim.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  26. Guerry, A.D. and M.L. Hunter. 2002. Amphibian distributions in a landscape of forests and agriculture: an examination of landscape composition and configuration. Conserv. Biol. 16: 745–754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hartel,T., C.I. Moga, I. David and I. Coroiu. 2009. Species richness - pond area relationships of amphibians and birds in two Natura 2000 protected areas of Romania. Community Ecol. 10: 159–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hartel, T., O. Schweiger, K. Íllerer, D. Cogalniceanu and J.W. Arntzen. 2010. Amphibian distribution in a traditionally managed rural landscape of Eastern Europe: Probing the effect of landscape composition. Biol. Conserv. 143: 1118–1124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Jeffries, M. 1991. The ecology and conservation value of forestry ponds in Scotland, United Kingdom. Biol. Conserv. 58: 191–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Jeppesen, E., M. Søndergaard, M. Søndergaard and K. Christoffersen. 1997. The structuring role of submerged water plants in lakes. Ecological Studies Series, 131. Springer, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kadoya, T., S.I. Suda and I. Washitani. 2004. Dragonfly species richness on man-made ponds: effects of pond size and pond age on newly established assemblages. Ecol. Res. 19: 461–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kerr, J., A. Sugar, and L. Packer. 2000. Indicator taxa, rapid biodiversity assessment, and nestedness in an endangered ecosystem. Conserv. Biol. 14: 1726–1734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Kiflawi, M., A., Eitam and L. Blaustein. 2003. The relative impact of local and regional processes on macro-invertebrate species richness in temporary ponds. J. Anim. Ecol 72: 447–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Laan, R. and B. Verboon. 1990. Effects of pool size and isolation on amphibian communities. Biol. Conserv. 54: 251–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Lanza, B. 1983. Guida per il riconoscimento delle specie animali delle acque interne italiane: Anfibi e Rettili (Amphibia, Reptilia). Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Roma.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Legendre, P. and E.D. Gallagher. 2001. Ecologically meaningful transformations for ordination of species data. Oecologia 129: 271–280.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Legendre, P. and L. Legendre. 1998. Numerical ecology. Second English edition. Elsivier Science BV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Lehtinen, R.M. and S.M. Galatowitsch. 2000. Colonization of restored wetlands by amphibians in Minnesota. Am. Midl. Nat. 145:388–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Mari, E., E. Santi, S. Piazzini, M. Renzi and S. Maccherini. 2010. Development of biological diversity in farmland ponds. J. Fresh. Ecol. 25: 95–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Nicolet, P., J. Biggs, G. Fox, M. J. Hodson, C. Reynolds, M. Whit-field and P. Williams. 2004. The wetland plant and macroinvertebrate assemblages of temporary ponds in England and Wales. Biol. Conserv. 120: 261–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Nilsson, A.N. 1984. Species richness and succession of aquatic beetles in some kettle-hole ponds in northern Sweden. Holarctic Ecol. 7: 149–156.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Oertli, B., J. D. Auderset, E. Castella, R. Juge, D. Cambin and J. B. Lachavanne. 2002. Does size matter? The relationship between pond area and biodiversity. Biol. Conserv. 104:59–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Oertli, B., J.D.Auderset , E. Castella, R. Juge, A. Lehmann and J.B. Lachavanne. 2005. PLOCH: a standardize method for sampling and assessing the biodiversity in ponds. Aquat. Conserv.: Mar. Freshwat. Ecosyst. 15: 665–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Oksanen, J., R. Kindt and R.B. O’Hara. 2005. Vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package Version 1.6–10.

  45. Paavola, R., T. Muotka, R. Virtanen, J. Heino, D. Jackson and A. Mäaki-Petäys. 2006. Spatial scale affects community concordance among fishes, benthic macroinvertebrates, and bryophytes in streams. Ecol. Appl. 16: 368–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Pechmann, J.H.K., R.A. Estes, D.E. Scott and J.W. Gibbons. 2001. Amphibian colonization and use of ponds created for trial mitigation of wetland loss. Wetlands 21: 93–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Peres-Neto, P.,P. Legendre,S. Dray and D. Borcard. 2006. Variation partitioning of species data matrices: estimation and comparison of fractions. Ecology 87: 2614–2625.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Pignatti, S. 1982. Flora d’Italia. Edagricole, Bologna.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Pillsbury, F.C. and J.R. Miller. 2008. Habitat and landscape characteristics underlying anuran community structure along an urban-rural gradient. Ecol. Appl. 18: 1107–1118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Pond Action 1994. The Oxfordshire Pond Survey. Pond Action.

  51. Pough, F.H., R.M. Andrews, J.E. Cadle, M.L. Crump, A.H. Savitzky, and K.D. Wells. 2004. Herpetology. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Prendergast, J. R. et al. 1999. The gaps between theory and practice in selecting nature reserves. Conserv. Biol. 13: 484–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. R Development Core Team, 2009. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Remsburg, A.J. and M.G. Turner. 2009. Aquatic and terrestrial drivers of dragonfly (Odonata) assemblages within and among north-temperate lakes. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 28: 44–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Rocchi, S. 2007. Insecta Coleoptera Hydroadephaga. In: S. Ruffo and F. Stoch (eds.), Checklist e distribuzione delle specie della fauna italiana. Memorie del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Verona, Sezione Scienze della Vita 16. pp. 165–168.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Rubbo, M.J. and J.M. Kiesecker. 2005. Amphibian breeding distribution in an urbanized landscape. Conserv. Biol. 19: 504–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Scheffer, M., 1998. Ecology of Shallow Lakes. Chapman and Hall, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Savage, A.A. 1982. Use of water boatmen (Corixidae) in the classification of lakes. Biol. Conserv. 23: 55–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Snodgrass, J.W., M.J. Komoroski, A.L. Bryan, Jr. and J. Burger. 2000. Relationships among isolated wetland size, hydroperiod, and amphibian species richness: implications for wetland regulations. Conserv. Biol. 14: 414–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Solimini, A.G., A. Ruggiero, V. Bernardi and G. Carchini. 2003. Temporal pattern of macroinvertebrate diversity and production in a new man made shallow lake. Hydrobiologia 506–509: 373–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Spencer, M., L. Blaustein, S.S. Schwartz and J. Cohen. 1999. Species richness and the proportion of predatory animal species in temporary freshwater pools: relationships with habitat size and permanence. Ecol. Letters 2: 157–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Spencer, M., S.S. Schwartz and L. Blaustein. 2002. Are there fine-scale spatial patterns in community similarity among temporary freshwater pools? Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 11: 71–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Steinman, A.D., J. Conklin, P.J. Bohlen and D.G. Uzarski. 2003. Influence of cattle grazing and pasture land use on macroinvertebrate communities in freshwater wetlands. Wetlands 23: 877–889.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Tamanini, L. 1979. Guidaper il riconoscimento delle specie animali delle acque interne italiane: Eterotteri acquatici (Heteroptera): Gerromorpha, Nepomorpha. Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Roma.

    Google Scholar 

  65. ter Braak, C.J.F. 1985. Correspondence analysis of incidence and abundance data: properties in terms of a unimodal response model. Biometrics 41: 859–873.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Trigal, C, F. Garcìa-Criado and C.F. Alaez. 2007. Macroinvertebrate communities of mediterranean ponds (North Iberian Plateau): importance of natural and human-induced variability. Freshwat. Biol. 52: 2042–2055.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Utzeri, C. and C. D’Antonio. 2007. Insecta Odonata. In: S. Ruffo and F. Stoch (eds.), Checklist e distribuzione delle specie della fauna italiana. Memorie del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Verona, Sezione Scienze della Vita 16. pp. 137–148.

  68. Van de Meutter, F., R. Stoks and L. De Meester. 2006. Lotic dispersal of lentic macroinvertebrates. Ecography 29: 223–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Van de Meutter, F., L. De Meester and R. Stoks. 2007. Meta-community structure of pond macro invertebrates: Effects of dispersal mode and generation time. Ecology 88: 1687–1695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Wells, K.D. 2007. The Ecology and Behaviour of Amphibians. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  71. Whittaker, R.H. 1960. Vegetation of the Siskiyou Mountains, Oregon and California. Ecol. Monogr. 30: 279–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Williams, P., M. Whitfield, J. Biggs, S. Bray, G. Fox, P. Nicolet and D. Sear. 2004. Comparative biodiversity of rivers, streams, ditches and ponds in an agricultural landscape in Southern England. Biol. Conserv. 115: 329–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Wolters, V., J. Bengtsson and A.S. Zaitsev. 2006. Relationship among the species richness of different taxa. Ecology 87: 1886–1895.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Wood, P.J., M.T. Greenwood and M.D. Agnew. 2003. Pond biodiversity and habitat loss in the UK. Area 35.2: 206–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Santi.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Santi, E., Mari, E., Piazzini, S. et al. Dependence of animal diversity on plant diversity and environmental factors in farmland ponds. COMMUNITY ECOLOGY 11, 232–241 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1556/ComEc.11.2010.2.12

Download citation

Keywords

  • Aquatic insect
  • Amphibians
  • Community composition
  • Conservation biology
  • Forward selection
  • Plant diversity
  • Variation partitioning