Advertisement

Community Ecology

, Volume 10, Issue 1, pp 35–44 | Cite as

Latitude-related variation in understory vegetation of boreal Populus tremuloides stands in Alberta, Canada

  • W. L. StrongEmail author
  • M. J. Redburn
Article

Abstract

Relevé data (n = 216) from two-pairs of study areas located in the boreal forest of central and northern Alberta (Canada), with their centroids separated by 3.7° of latitude, were analyzed to determine if latitude-related species richness, composition, and abundance differences occurred in the understories of Populus tremuloides forest stands. No difference in study area species richness (P = 0.248) occurred, which included 78 to 105 species (average 94). North compared to south areas had reduced relevé, forb, and graminoid richness; greater dominance concentration; and less total, vascular understory, herb, forb, and graminoid canopy cover (P <0.001). Nine herbs (Calamagrostis canadensis, Cornus canadensis, Eurybia conspicua, Fragaria virginiana, Galium boreale, Lathyrus ochroleucus, Mertensia paniculata, Pedicularis labradorica, and Sym-phyotrichum ciliolatum) and two shrubs (Lonicera involucrata and Vaccinium caespitosum) decreased in abundance (total ~25% cover) from the south to north areas (P <0.001), and were associated ecologically with more open-growing forests and nontreed sites. Latitudinal differences were interpreted to be a response to cooler and slightly drier climatic conditions, and to reduced PAR availability caused by lower angles of solar incidence and the resulting more intensive shading by trees in northern areas. These factors in combination were estimated to reduce PAR to understory plants by at least 20%. Eight vegetation-types were recognized; each mostly limited to one study area. However, a P. tremuloides/Rosa type occurred in both south and north areas. The northern variant contained less Rosa acicularis (21%) and more (~6%) Leymus innovatus, Linnaea borealis, and Cornus canadensis cover than southern stands.

Keywords

Aspen Biodiversity Ecology Photosynthetically-active radiation Plant community 

Abbreviations

DCA

Detrended Correspondence Analysis

PAR

Photosynthetically-active radiation

POTR

Populus tremuloides

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, L.E., H.A. Crum and W.R. Buck. 1990. Checklist of mosses of North America north of Mexico. Bryologist 93:448–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Archibald, J.H., N.B. Ferguson, R.W. Haag, W.K. Hay and D.J. O’Leary. 1984. Integrated Resource Inventory of the Deep Basin Area (NTS 83L). Alberta Energy Nat. Resour. Tech. Rep. T/78.Google Scholar
  3. Aubin, I., M. Beaudet and C. Messier. 2000. Light extinction coefficients specific to understory vegetation of the southern boreal forest, Quebec. Can. J. For. Res. 30:168–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barry, R.G. and R.J. Chorley. 2003. Atmosphere, Weather and Climate. Routledge, New York.Google Scholar
  5. Beckingham, J.D. and J.H. Archibald. 1996. Field Guide to Ecosites of Northern Alberta. Can. For. Serv. Spec. Rep. 5.Google Scholar
  6. Booth, D.T., S.E. Cox, T.W. Meikle and T.W. Fitzgerald. 2006. The accuracy of ground measurements. Rangeland Ecol. Manage. 59:179–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bruun, H.H., J. Moen, R. Virtanen, J-A. Grytnes, L. Oksanen and A. Angerbjörn. 2006. Effects of altitude and topography on species richness of vascular plants, bryophytes and lichens in alpine communities. J. Veg. Sci. 17:37–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Buffo, J., L.J. Fritschen and J.L. Murphy. 1972. Direct Solar Radiation on Various Slopes from 0 to 60 Degrees North Latitude. USDA For. Serv. Res. Paper PNW-142.Google Scholar
  9. Carmargo, J.A. 1993. Must dominance increase with the number of subordinate species in competitive interactions? J. Theor. Biol. 161:537–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carlson, D.W. and A. Groot. 1997. Microclimate of clear-cut, forest interior, and small openings in trembling aspen forest. Agric. For. Meteorol. 87:313–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chytrý, M. and Z. Otýpková. 2003. Plot sizes used for phytosociological sampling of European vegetation. J. Veg. Sci. 14:563–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Constabel, A.J. and V.J. Lieffers. 1996. Seasonal patterns of light transmission through boreal mixedwood canopies. Can. J. For. Res. 26:1008–1014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Downing, D. and E. Karpuk. 1992. Aspen Vegetation Types of the Low Boreal Mixedwood Ecoregion, East Central Alberta. Alberta For. Lands Wildl. Publ. T/271.Google Scholar
  14. Ecoregions Working Group. 1989. Ecoclimatic Regions of Canada. Can. Wildl. Serv. Ecol. Land Classif. Ser. No. 23.Google Scholar
  15. Field, R., E.M. O’Brien and R.J. Whittaker. 2005. Global models for predicting woody plant richness from climate: development and evolution. Ecology 86:2263–2277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gendron, F., C. Messier, E. Lo and P.G. Comeau. 2006. The angular distribution of diffuse photosynthetically active radiation under different sky conditions in the open and within deciduous and coniferous forest stands of Quebec and British Columbia, Canada. Ann. For. Sci. 63:43–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Greenway, K.J. and V.J. Lieffers. 1997. A boreal forest grass with an open meadow photosynthetic strategy. Can. J. Bot. 75:562–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Haeussler, S., D. Coates and J. Mather. 1990. Autecology of Common Plants in British Columbia: A Literature Review. Canada/BC Econ. Reg. Develop. Agreement FRDA Rep. 158.Google Scholar
  19. Hegazy, A.K., J. Lovett-Doust, O. Hammouda and N.H. Gomaa. 2007. Vegetation distribution along the altitudinal gradient in the northwestern Red Sea region. Community Ecol. 8:151–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Helm, D.J. and B.R. Mead. 2003. Reproducibility of vegetation cover estimates in south-central Alaska forests. J. Veg. Sci. 14:33–40.Google Scholar
  21. Hillebrand, H. 2004. On the generality of the latitudinal diversity gradient. Am. Nat. 163:192–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hull, J.C. 2002. Photosynthetic induction dynamics to sunflecks of four deciduous forest understory herbs with different phenologies. Intl. J. Plant Sci. 163:913–924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kartesz, J.T. and H.D. Wilson. 1998. A Synonymized Checklist of the Vascular Flora of the United States, Puerto Rico, and Virgin Islands. ULR: https://doi.org/www.csdl.tamu.edu/FLORA/b98/ c98open.htm (accessed June 2007).
  24. Kent, M. and P. Coker. 1992. Vegetation Description and Analysis: A Practical Approach. Belhaven Press, London.Google Scholar
  25. Krzic, M., R.F. Newman and K. Broersma. 2003. Plant species diversity and soil quality in harvested and grazed boreal aspen stands of northeastern British Columbia. For. Ecol. Manage. 182:315–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Küchler, A.W. 1964. Potential Natural Vegetation of the Conterminous United States. Am. Geog. Soc. Spec. Publ. 36.Google Scholar
  27. Lappi, J. and P. Stenberg. 1998. Joint effects of angular distribution of radiation and spatial patterns of trees on radiation interception. Ecol. Model. 112:45–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Légaré, S., Y. Bergeron, A. Leduc and D. Pare. 2001. Comparison of the understory vegetation in boreal forest types of southwest Quebec. Can. J. Bot. 79:1019–1027.Google Scholar
  29. Lieffers, V.J. and K.J. Stadt. 1994. Growth of understory Picea-glauca, Calamagrostis canadensis, and Epilobium angustifolium in relation to overstory light. Can. J. For. Res. 24:1193–1198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lyons, S.K. and M.R. Willig. 1999. A hemispheric assessment of scale dependence in latitudinal gradients of species richness. Ecology 80:2483–2491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McCune, B. and M.J. Mefford. 1999. PC-ORDfor Windows. MjM Software, Glenedon Beach, Oregon.Google Scholar
  32. Messier, C., S. Parent and Y. Bergeron. 1998. Effect of overstory and understory vegetation on the understory light environment in mixed boreal forests. J. Veg. Sci. 9:511–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Miller, R.G.Jr. 1966. Simultaneous Statistical Inference. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York.Google Scholar
  34. Moss, E.H. 2001. Flora of Alberta. Univ. Toronto Press, Toronto, Ontario.Google Scholar
  35. Mueller-Dombois, D. and H. Ellenberg. 1974. Aims and Methods of Vegetation Ecology. John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  36. O’Brien, E.M. 1993. Climatic gradients in woody plant species richness: towards an explanation based on an analysis of southern Africa’s woody flora. J. Biogeog. 20:181–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. O’Leary, D. and D.J. Downing. 1986. Integrated Resource Inventory of the Grande Prairie County West Study Area. Alberta For. Lands Wildl. Tech. Rep. T/130.Google Scholar
  38. Oliver, C.D. and B.C. Larson. 1990. Forest Stand Dynamics. McGraw-Hill Inc., New York.Google Scholar
  39. Pitelka, L.P. and W.F. Curtis. 1986. Photosynthetic response to light in an understory herb, Aster acuminatus. Am. J. Bot. 73: 535–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Redburn, M.J. and W.L Strong. 2008. Successional development of silviculturally treated and untreated high-latitude Populus tremuloides clearcuts in northern Alberta, Canada. For. Ecol. Manage. 255:2937–2949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ross, M.S., L.B. Flanagan and G.H. LaRoi. 1986. Seasonal and successional changes in light quality and quantity in the understory of boreal forest ecosystems. Can. J. Bot. 64:2792–2799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Smith, B. and J.B. Wilson. 1996. A consumer’s guide to evenness indices. Oikos 76:70–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sokal, R.R. and F.J. Rohlf. 1981. Biometry. W.H. Freeman and Company, New York.Google Scholar
  44. Statsoft. 1995. STATISTICA for Windows. Statsoft Inc., Tulsa, Oklahoma.Google Scholar
  45. Strong, W.L. 1992. Ecoregions and Ecodistricts of Alberta. Alberta For. Lands Wildl., Edmonton. Publ. T/244.Google Scholar
  46. Strong, W.L. 2002a. Lodgepole pine/Labrador tea type communities of western Canada. Can. J. Bot. 80:151–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Strong, W.L. 2002b. Assessing species abundance unevenness within and between plant communities. Community Ecol. 3:237–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Thornthwaite, C.W. and J.R. Mather. 1957. Instructions and Tables for Computing Potential Evaporation and Water Balance, Vol. X, No. 3. Drexel Inst. Technol. Publ. Climatol., Centerton, N. J.Google Scholar
  49. Wetherill, G.B. 1981. Intermediate Statistical Methods. Chapman & Hall, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zavitkovski, J. 1976. Ground vegetation biomass, production, and efficiency of energy utilization in some northern Wisconsin forest ecosystems. Ecology 57:694–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest 2008

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Environmental DesignUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryCanada

Personalised recommendations