Advertisement

Community Ecology

, Volume 1, Issue 1, pp 81–87 | Cite as

A comparison of sampling designs in a Hainan tropical rain forest

  • S. X. YuEmail author
  • H. S. Y. Chan
  • K. W. Chung
Open Access
Article

Abstract

Different sampling strategies are simulated by changing quadrat size, quadrat shape, sample size and the arrangement of quadrats in a tropical rain forest of Hainan (South China). The simulation uses enumeration data of trees, and derived variables such as species richness, species importance, and species population density, to compare the efficiency of the sampling. The results verify that greater sampling efficiency is to be expected using systematic sampling than random sampling. Quadrat size has substantial influence on parameter estimation, but quadrat shape has negligible effect except when the quadrat is extremely long and narrow.

Keywords

Accuracy Efficiency GIS simulation Parameter estimation Quadrat size Quadrat shape Sample size Sampling method 

Abbreviations

G1S

Geographic Information System

DBH

Diameter at Breast Height.

References

  1. Arvantis, L.G. and W.G. O’Regan. 1967. Computer simulation and economics efficiency in forest sampling. Hilgardia 38: 133–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Condit, R., S.P. Hubbell, J. V. Lafrankie, R. Sukumar, N. Manokaran, R.B. Foster and P.S. Ashton. 1996. Species–area and species–individual relationships for tropical trees: a comparison of three 50-ha plots. J. Ecol. 84: 549–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Condit, R., R.B. Foster, S.P. Hubbell, R. Sukumar, E.G. Leigh, N. Manokaran, Suzanne Loo de Lao, J.V. La Frankie and P.S. Ashton. 1998. Assessing forest diversity on small plots: Calibration using species-individual curves from 50-ha plots. In: F. Dallmeier and J.A. Comiskey (eds.), Forest Biodiversity Research, Monitoring and Modeling. Man and the Bioshpere Series, Vol 20. The Parthenon Publishing Group. pp. 247–269.Google Scholar
  4. Curtis, J.T. 1947. The palo verde forest type near Gonivaves, Haiti, and its relation to the surrounding vegetation. Carib. Forest. 8: 1–26.Google Scholar
  5. Greig-Smith, P. 1983. Quantitative Plant Ecology (3rd ed.). Black-well, Oxford.Google Scholar
  6. Eckblad, J. W. 1991. How many samples should be taken? Bioscience 41: 346–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kenkel, N.C., P. Juhász-Nagy and J. Podani. 1989. On sampling procedures in population and community ecology. Vegetatio 83: 195–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kenkel, N.C. and J. Podani. 1991. Plot size and estimation efficiency in plant community studies. J. Veg. Sci. 2: 539–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. O’Regan, W.G. and M.N. Palley. 1965. A computer technique for the study of forest sampling methods. Forest Sci. 11: 99–114.Google Scholar
  10. O’Regan, W.G., R.W. Seegrist and R.L. Hubbard. 1973. Computer simulation and vegetation sampling. J. Wildlife Manage. 37: 217–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Orlóci, L. 1991. Statistics in ecosystem survey: computer support for process-based sample stability tests and entropy/information inference. In: E. Feoli and L. Orlóci (eds.). Computer Assisted Vegetation Analysis, Handbook of Vegetation Science, Vol. 11. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht. pp. 47–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Orlóci, L. 1993. The complexities and scenarios of ecosystem analysis. In: G. P. Patil and C. R. Rao (eds.). Multivariate Environmental Statistics. North Holland/Elsevier, New York. pp. 421–430.Google Scholar
  13. Orlóci, L. and V. Pillar, De Patta. 1989. On sampling size optimality in ecosystem survey. Biométrie-Praximétrie 33:7–26.Google Scholar
  14. Palley, M. N. and W.G. O’Regan. 1961. A computer technique for the study of forest sampling methods. I. Point sampling compared with line sampling. Forest Sci. 7: 282–294.Google Scholar
  15. Podani, J. 1987. Computerized sampling in vegetation studies. Coenoses 2: 9–18.Google Scholar
  16. Sampford, M. R. 1962. An introduction to Sampling Theory. Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  17. Wensel, L. C. 1975. The treatment of boundary-line overlap in a forest sampling simulator. Hilgardia 43: 143–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Wensel, L. C. and H. H. John. 1969. A statistical procedure for combining different types of sampling. Forest Sci. 15: 307–317.Google Scholar
  19. Yu, S. X. 1989. A primary study on the vertical distribution of species in the community space of Bawangling tropical rain forest. Ecological Science 8: 118–123.Google Scholar
  20. Yu, S.X., H.T Chang and B.S. Wang, 1993. Tropical montane rain forest of Bawangling nature reserve, Hainan Island. I. Permanent plot and the community types. Ecological Science 12: 13–18.Google Scholar
  21. Yu, S.X., H.T. Chang and B.S. Wang. 1994. Tropical montane rain forest of Bawangling nature reserve, Hainan island. II. Quantitative analysis of community structure. Ecological Science 13: 21–31.Google Scholar
  22. Yu, S.X. and L. Orlóci. 1990. On niche overlap and its measurement. Coenoses 5: 159–165.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest 2000

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BiologyZhongshan (Sunyatsen) UniversityGuangzhouP.R. China
  2. 2.Department of MathematicsCity University of Hong KongHong KongP.R. China

Personalised recommendations