Advertisement

Cereal Research Communications

, Volume 40, Issue 3, pp 342–350 | Cite as

Graphic Analysis of Salinity Tolerance Traits of Rice (Oryza Sativa L.) Using Biplot Method

  • P. SharifiEmail author
Article

Abstract

Salinity stress is one of the important abiotic stresses affecting rice germination and reduces establishment of seedlings in the field. Six varieties of rice were included in a full diallel mating design and together with their progenies were evaluated for salinity tolerance. General combining ability (GCA) effect was significant for germination percentage reduction (GP) and radicle length reduction (RL); whereas specific combining ability (SCA) were significant for all of traits contain GP, RL, germination rate reduction (GR) and coleoptile length reduction (CL). The negative value of heterosis, due to inverse relation of reduction of traits and salinity tolerance, indicated ideal heterosis. The highest value of negative heterosis for GP, GR, RL and CL were displayed in Shahpasand × Sepidrod, Hassani × Sepidrod, Shahpasand × IRFAON-215 and Sepidrod × IRFAON-215, respectively. The parents with negative GCA are superior for salinity tolerance traits. The Genotype, Genotype-by-Environment (GGE) biplot analysis showed that Sepidrod contributed resistance to GP, GR and IRFAON-215 was the best parent for RL and CL. Respondent this view, Sepidrod and IRFAON-215 can be used either as best parents for selection programs due to their GCA effects, or as a superior parent hybrid programs on their SCA effects.

Keywords

combining ability diallel heritability GGE biplot salinity tolerance 

Abbriviation

RL

radicle length reduction

CL

coleoptile length reduction

GP

germination percentage reduction

GR

germination rate reduction

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Akbar, M., Yabuno, T. 1974. Breeding for saline resistant varieties of rice 2: comparative performance of some rice varieties to salinity during early developmental stages. Japanese J. of Breeding 24:176–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alam, M.Z., Bhuiya, M.A.A., Muttaleb, M.A., Rashid, M.M. 2004. Effect of alternating saline and non-saline conditions on emergence and seedling growth of rice. Pakestan J. of Biol. Sci. 7:883–890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Butorac, J., Beljo, J., Gunjaèa, J. 2004. Study of inheritance of some agronomic and morphological traits in burley tobacco by graphic analysis of diallel cross. Plant and Soil Environ. 50:162–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gregorio, G.B., Senadhira, D. 1993. Genetic analysis of salinity tolerance in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 86:333–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Griffing, B. 1956. Concept of general and specific combining ability in relation to diallel crossing systems. Aust. J. of Biol. Sci. 9:463–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kozlowski, T.T. 1997. Responses of woody plants to flooding and salinity. Tree Physiology Online Monograph No. 1: 1–29. https://doi.org/www.heronpublishing.com/tp/monograph/kozlowski.pdf
  7. Krishnamoorthy, G. 2005. A study of heterotic relationships in sorghum. PhD thesis, A&M University, Texas, USA.Google Scholar
  8. Moeljopawiro, S., Ikehashi, H. 1981. Inheritance of salt tolerance in rice. Euphytica 30:291–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Munns, R. 2002. Comparative physiology of salt and water stress. Plant Cell Environ. 25:239–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Pearson, G.A., Ayers, A.D., Eberhard, D.L. 1966. Relative salt tolerance of rice during germination and early seedling development. Soil Sci. 102:151–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Pieper, A. 1952. Das Saatgut (The Seed). V.P. Darey Berlin, Hamburg, Germany. (in German)Google Scholar
  12. Puard, M., Clement, G., Mouret, J.C., Roux-Cuvelier, M. 1999. Strategies for rice salinity tolerance in Mediterranean France. Cahiers Options Mediterranéennes 40:83–96.Google Scholar
  13. Ray, P.K.S., Islam, M.A. 2008. Genetic analysis of salinity tolerance in rice. Bangladesh J. of Agricult. Res. 33:519–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. SAS 2005. SAS/STAT User’s Guide Version 9.1. SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA.Google Scholar
  15. Singh, S., Singh, A.K., Singh, H.P., Singh, R.S. 2008. Genetic analysis for seed germination, callus induction and survival of rice under salt at in vitro conditions. Oryza 45:512–520.Google Scholar
  16. Szabolcs, I. 1994. Soils and salinization. In: M. Pessarakli (ed.), Handbook of Plant and Crop Stress. Marcel Dekker, New York, USA, pp. 3–11.Google Scholar
  17. Wang, Z., Wang, J., Bao, Y., Wang, F., Zhang, H. 2010. Quantitative trait loci analysis for rice seed vigor during the germination stage. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. 11:958–964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Yan, W. 2001. GGE biplot — a Windows application for graphical analysis of multienvironment trial data and other types of two-way data. Agron. J. 93:1111–1118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Yan, W., Hunt, A. 2002. Biplot analysis of diallel data. Crop Sci. 42:21–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Yan, W., Kang, M. 2003. GGE Biplot Analysis: A Graphical Tool for Breeders, Geneticists, and Agronomists. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA, 288 pp.Google Scholar
  21. Yeo, A.R., Yeo, M.E., Flowers, S.A. 1990. Screening of rice genotypes for physiological characters contributing to salinity resistance and their relationship to overall performance. Theor. Appl. Gen. 79:377–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Rasht BranchIslamic Azad UniversityRashtIran

Personalised recommendations