Advertisement

Cereal Research Communications

, Volume 40, Issue 2, pp 235–245 | Cite as

Effect of Salinity and Molybdenum Application on Photosynthesis, Nitrogenase Activity and Yield of Barley Inoculated with Azosprillium brasilense

  • A. R. BagheriEmail author
  • A. R. Jafari
Article

Abstract

In order to evaluate the effect of Azosprillium inoculation and molybdenum application on common barley grown in saline condition, a greenhouse experiment was conducted at Azad university, branch of Eghlid, Iran. The experimental design was factorial based on complete randomized design with four replications. The first factor comprised of four salinity treatments (1 as control, 5, 10 and 15 ds m−1), second factor comprised the levels of Mo application (1: treated and 2: untreated = control) and the third factor included two levels of Azosprillum inoculation (inoculated and uninoculated = control). The measured parameters were chlorophyll fluorescence, photosynthesis (Ps) rates, carbohydrates, nitrate, ammonium and protein content, nitrogenase activity, grain yield (GY) and yield components. The results showed that salinity decreased GY in all levels. GY reduction in inoculated treatment was lower (12.9%) than uninoculated treatment (29.7%). GY reduction was highly related to the reduction of grain number (GN) rather than reduction in ear mX2. Inoculation and application of Mo reduced harmful effects of salinity especially on mean kernel weight and grain number. Soluble saccharides and protein contents increased with increasing salinity. Inoculation and Mo application significantly increased the content of fructan and sucrose respectively. The mean values of Fv/Fm and photosynthesis rate reduced in the salinity treatments compared to the control. Inoculation and Mo application significantly increased photosynthesis rates at all salinity levels. The highest plant N content was obtained from inoculated, control salinity treatment by applying Mo. In inoculated barley roots with application of Mo, nitrogenase activity (NA) was not severely inhibited by salinity. Data also showed that Mo application positively affected nitrogenase activity. Inoculation, caused plant to cope on the stress, effectively by increasing fructan content and NO3 /NH4 ratio and lower decrease in whole plant N content and Fv/Fm ratio. Generally, Azosprillium inoculation helped plants perform better under salinity treatments and Mo application ameliorated plant nitrogen status.

Keywords

NaCl dry matter photosynthesis efficiency root inoculation potassium molybdate 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Supplementary material

42976_2012_40020235_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (22 kb)
Supplementary material, approximately 228 KB.

References

  1. Abd El-Baki, G.K., Siefritz, F., Man, H.M., Weiner, H., Kaldenhoff, R., Kaiser, W.M. 2000. Nitrate reductase in Zea mays L. under salinity. Plant Cell Environ. 23:515–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Basu, M.S., Nautiyal, P.C. 2004. Improving water use efficiency and drought tolerance in groundnut by trait based breeding in India. Indian Farm 54:24–27.Google Scholar
  3. El-Komy, M.H., Hamdia, M.A., Abd El-Baki, G.K. 2003. Nitrate reductase in wheat plants grown under salinity and inoculated with Azospirillum spp. Biologia Plantarum 46:281–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Failik, E., Sarig, S., Okon, Y. 1994. Morphology and physiology of root associated with Azospirillum /plant associations. Okon, Y. (ed.), CRC Press, Bioca. Raton. Gla, pp. 77–85.Google Scholar
  5. Hamdia, M.A., El-Komy, M.H. 1998. Effect of salinity, gibberellic acid and Azospirillum inoculation on growth and nitrogen uptake of Zea mays. Biol. Planta 40:109–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hamdia, M.A., El-Komy, M.H., Barakat, N. 2000. The role of foliar potassium fertilization and Azospirillium lipoforum or Bacillus polymexa inoculation in nitrogen fixation and mineral nutrition of maize grown under salt stress. 8th International Colloquium for the Optimization of Plant Nutrition. April 8–13, Cairo Sheraton, Cairo, Egypt, p. 193.Google Scholar
  7. Hazewaga, P., Bressan, R.A., Zu, J.K., Bohnert, J. 2000. Plant cellular and molecular response to high salinity. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. 51:463–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hill, R. 1996. The mononuclear molybdenum enzymes. Chem. Rev. 96:2757–2816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Katerji, N., Van Hoorn, J.W., Hamdy, A., Mastrorilli, M. 2000. Salt tolerance classification of crops according to soil salinity and to water stress an index. Agric. Water Manage. 43:99–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Keles, Y., Oncel, I. 2004. Growth and solute composition on two wheat species experiencing combined influence of stress conditions. Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 51:203–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kerepesi, I., Galiba, G. 2000. Osmotic and salt stress — induced alteration in soluble carbohydrate content in wheat seedlings. Crop Sci. 40:482–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lowry, O.H., Roserbrough, N.J., Fail, A.L., Randall, R.J. 1951. Protein measurements with folin phenol reagent. J. Biol. Chem. 193:265–275.Google Scholar
  13. Masepohi, B., Kry, R., Klipp, W. 1993. The draTG gene region of Rodobactor capsulatus is a requirement for post-translational regulation of both the molybdenum at the alternative nitrogenase. J. Gen. Microbiol. 139:2667–2675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mendel, R.R., Hansch, R. 2002. Molybdoenzymes and molybdenum cofactor in plants. J. Exp. Bot. 53:1689–1698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mohammed, M., Campbell, W.F., Rumbaugh, M.D. 1989. Variation in salt tolerance of alflalfa. Arid Soil Rehabil. 3:11–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Okon, A., Labanadera-Gonzales, C.A. 1994. Agronomic application of Azospirillum. An Evaluation of 20 years worldwide field inoculation. Soil Biol. Biochem. 26:591–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ozturk, A., Aydin, F. 2004. Effect of water stress at various growth stages on some quality characteristics of winter wheat. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 190:93–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Pervaiz, Z., Afzal, M., Xi, S., Xiaoe, Y., Ancheng, L. 2002. Physiological parameters of salt tolerance in wheat. Asian J. Plant Sci. 1:478–481. https://doi.org/www.salinesystems.org/content/2/1/7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Peuke, A.D., Glaab, J., Kaiser, W.D., Jeschke, W.D. 1996. The uptake and flow of C, N and ions between roots and shoots in Ricinus communis. IV. Flow and metabolism of inorganic N and malate depending on nitrogen nutrition and salt treatment. J. Exp. Bot. 47:377–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pollock, V.V., Conover, R.C., Johnson, M.K., Barber, M.J. 2002. Bacterial expression of the molybdenum domain of assimilate nitrate reductase: Production of both the functional and nonfunctional molybdenum-containing domain. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2:237–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rennie, R.J. 1980. 15N-isotop dilution as a measure of nitrogen fixation by Azospirillum brasilense associated with maize. Can. J. Bot. 58:21–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ribaudo, C.M., Rondanini, D.P., Cura, J.A., 2001. Response of Zea mays to the inoculation with Azospirillum on nitrogen metabolism under greenhouse conditions. Biol. Plant 44:631–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ribaudo, C.M., Paccusse, A.N., Cura, J.A., Frascina, A.A. 1998. Azospirillum maize association: Effects on yield and nitrate reductase activity. Agr. Trop. Subtrop. 31:61–70.Google Scholar
  24. Seo, M., Koshiba, T. 2002. The complex regulation of ABA biosynthesis in plants. Trends in Plant Sci. 7:41–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sigel, A., Sigel, H. 2002. Molybdenum and Tungsten: Their Roles in Biological Processes. Metal Ions in Biological Systems. Marcel Dekker, New York, USA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Taiz, L., Zeiger, E. 2006. Plant Physiology. 4th Edn, Sinauer Associated Inc., 690 pp.Google Scholar
  27. Turner, G.L.K., Gibson, A.H. 1980. Measurement of nitrogen fixation by indirect means. In: Bergersen, F.J. (ed.), Methods for Evaluating Biological Nirtogen Fixation. John Willey & Sons, New York, USA, pp. 111–138.Google Scholar
  28. Williams, V., Twine, S. 1960. Flame photometeric method for element analysis. In: Paech, K., Tracey, M.V. (eds), Modern Meth. Plant Analys. Vol. 5, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 3–5.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of agronomyIslamic Azad UniversityEghlid branchIran
  2. 2.Department of biologyIslamic Azad UniversityArsanjan branchIran

Personalised recommendations