Advertisement

Cereal Research Communications

, Volume 40, Issue 2, pp 225–234 | Cite as

Growth and Metabolic Responses of Maize (C4 Species) and Rice (C3 Species) Genotypes to Cadmium Toxicity

  • S. Goel
  • J. A. Malik
  • R. Awasthi
  • R. Sandhir
  • H. NayyarEmail author
Open Access
Article

Abstract

Toxic metals such as cadmium (Cd) are detrimental for growth of the crops. The differential sensitivity of maize and rice, the two vital cereals, which also belong to C4 and C3 plant types, respectively, to a similar degree of Cd stress is not known that comprised the objective of this study. Maize and rice genotypes were grown hydroponically in the presence of 5 and 10 μM cadmium (Cd) concentrations to examine their relative sensitivity to this metal at growth and metabolic levels. The shoots of maize genotypes accumulated relatively greater cadmium than those of rice while the roots of both the plant types did not differ significantly in cadmium accumulation. The shoots and roots of maize genotypes showed higher growth than rice genotypes under both Cd levels. At similar Cd level, the rice shoots showed greater damage to membranes and chlorophyll than maize shoots. The activities of RUBP carboxylase and phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase were significantly greater in maize than in rice under Cd stress. Maize genotypes also possessed greater sucrose content and sucrose phosphate synthase activity in their shoots than rice genotypes. The oxidative damage as malondialdehyde and hydrogen peroxide was higher in rice genotypes. The rice genotypes showed greater induction of antioxidants such as superoxide dismutase, catalase, ascorbate peroxidase, glutathione reductase and ascorbic acid than maize genotypes. On the other hand, glutathione, proline, metallothioneins, total thiols content and glutathione-s-transferase activity were significantly higher in maize genotypes under Cd stress suggesting their superior capacity to deal with Cd toxicity. The observations indicated that the maize genotypes representing C4 plant type appear to have greater Cd tolerance than the rice genotypes representing C3 plant type. The findings speculate that C4 plant species may adapt to toxic metals such as Cd in a better way than C3 ones but further study involving several representatives of these plant types need to be carried out to corroborate it.

Keywords

cadmium carbon metabolism metallothioneins Oryza sativa oxidative stress Zea mays 

Supplementary material

42976_2012_40020225_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (25 kb)
Supplementary material, approximately 228 KB.

References

  1. Ali, M.B., Chun, H.S., Kim, B.K., Lee, C.B. 2002. Cadmium-induced changes in antioxidant enzyme activities in rice (Oryza sativa L. cv. Dongjin). J. Plant Biol. 45:134–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arnon, D.I. 1949. Copper enzyme in isolated chloroplasts: Polyphenol oxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiol. 24:1–15.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Barrs, H.D., Weatherley, P.E. 1962. A re-examination of the relative turgidity techniques for estimating water deficits in leaves. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 15:413–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bates, L.S., Woldren, R.P., Teare I.D. 1973. Rapid determination of free proline for water stress studies. Plant and Soil 39:205–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blanke, M., Notton, B., Hucklesby, D. 1986. Physcial and kinetic properties of photosynthetic PEP carboxylase in developing apple fruit. Phyochem. 25:601–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cai, Y., Su, J., Ma, L.Q. 2004. Low molecular weight thiols in arsenic hyperaccumulator Pteris vittata upon exposure to arsenic and other trace elements. Environ. Pollut. 129:69–78.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Change, B., Maehly, A.C. 1955. Assay of catalases and peroxidase. Methods Enzymol. 2:764–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chao, Y.Y., Kao, C.H. 2010. Heat shock-induced ascorbic acid accumulation in leaves increases cadmium tolerance of rice (Oryza sativa L.) seedlings. Plant and Soil 336:39–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ci, D., Jiang, D., Wollenweber, B., Dai, T., Jing, Q., Cao, W. 2010. Cadmium stress in wheat seedlings: Growth, cadmium accumulation and photosynthesis. Acta Physiol. Plantarum 32:365–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. DalCorso, G., Farinati, S., Maistri, S., Furini, A. 2008. How plants cope with cadmium: Staking all on metabolism and gene expression. J. Integrative Plant Biol. 50:1268–1280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dejardin, A., Rochat, C., Maugenest, S., Boutin, J.P. 1997. Purification, characterization and physiological role of sucrose synthase in the pea seed coat (Pisum sativum L.). Planta 201:128–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Devi, R., Munjral, N., Gupta, A.K., Kaur, N. 2007. Cadmium induced changes in carbohydrate status and enzymes of carbohydrate metabolism, glycolysis and pentose phosphate pathway in pea. Environ. and Exp. Bot. 61:167–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dixon, D.P., Lapthorn, A., Edwards, R. 2005. Plant glutathione transferases. Genome biology. Plant Physiol. and Biochem. 43:491–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ellman, G.L. 1959. Tissue sulfhydryl groups. Arch. Biochem. and Biophysics 82:70–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Foyer, C.H., Halliwell, B. 1976. The presence of glutathione and glutathione reductase in chloroplasts: A proposed role in ascorbic acid metabolism. Planta 133:21–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Freeman, J.L., Persans, M.W., Nieman, K., Albrecht, C., Peer, W., Pickering, I.J., Salta, D.E. 2004. Increased glutathione biosynthesis plays a role in nickel tolerance in Thlaspi nickel hyperaccumulators. Plant Cell 16:2176–2191.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Gambarova, N.G., Gins, M.S. 2008. Antioxidant defense in the leaves of C3 and C4 plants under salinity stress. Russian J. Plant Physiol. 34:77–80.Google Scholar
  18. Giannopolities, C.N., Ries, S.K. 1977. Superoxide dismutase. I. Occurrence in higher plants. Plant Physiol. 59:309–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Griffth, O.W. 1980. Determination of glutathione and glutathione disulfide using glutathione reductase and 2 vinyl pyridine. Ann. Biochem. 106:207–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gyuricza, V., Fodor, F., Szigeti, Z. 2010. Phytotoxic effects of heavy metal contaminated soil reveal limitations of extract-based ecotoxicological tests. Water Air Soil Poll. 210:113–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Habig, W.H., Pabst, M.J., Jackoby, W.B. 1974. Glutathione-s-transferase, the first enzymatic step in mercapturic acid formation. J. Environ. Qual. 2:93–96.Google Scholar
  22. Harada, E., Yamaguchi, Y., Koizumi, N., Hiroshi, S. 2002. Cadmium stress induces production of thiol compounds and transcripts for enzymes involved in sulphur assimilation pathways in Arabidopsis. J. Plant Physiol. 159:445–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hawker, J.S., Walker, R.R., Raffner, H.P. 1976. Invertase and sucrose synthase in flowers. Phytochem. 15:1411–1443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Heath, R.L., Packer, L. 1968. Photoperoxidation in isolated chloroplast. I. Kinetics and stochiometery of fatty acid peroxidation. Arch. Biochem. and Biophysics 125:189–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Heyno, E., Klose, C., Krieger-Liszkay, A. 2008. Origin of cadmium-induced reactive oxygen species production: Mitochondrial electron transfer versus plasma membrane NADPH oxidase. New Phytol. 179:687–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hsu, Y.T., Kao, C.H. 2007. Toxicity in leaves of rice exposed to cadmium is due to hydrogen peroxide accumulation. Plant and Soil 298:231–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jain, M., Pal, M., Gupta, P., Gadre, R. 2007. Effect of cadmium on chlorophyll biosynthesis and enzymes of nitrogen assimilation in greening maize leaf segments: Role of 2-oxoglutarate. Indian J. Exp. Biol. 45:385–389.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Jones, M.G.K., Outlaw, W.H. Jr, Lowry, O.H. 1977. Enzymic assay of 10-7 to 10-14 moles of sucrose in plant tissues. Plant Physiol. 60:379–383.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Krantev, A., Yordanova, R., Janda, T., Szalai, G., Popova, L. 2008. Treatment with salicylic acid decreases the effect of cadmium on photosynthesis in maize plants. J. Plant Physiol. 165:920–931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kumar, P., Tewari, R.K., Sharma, P.N. 2007. Cadmium enhances generation of hydrogen peroxide and amplifies activities of catalase, peroxidases and superoxide dismutase in Maize. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Sci. 194:72–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lee, K.R., Roh, K.S. 2003. Influence of cadmium on rubisco activation in Canavalia ensiformis L. leaves. Biotechnol. and Bioprocess Engin. 8:94–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Markovska, Y.K., Gorinova, N.I., Nedkovska, M.P., Miteva, K.M. 2009. Cadmium-induced oxidative damage and antioxidant responses in Brassica juncea plants. Biologia Plantarum 53:151–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Memon, A.R., Schröder, P. 2009. Implications of metal accumulation mechanisms to phytoremediation. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 16:162–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mittler, R. 2002. Oxidative stress, antioxidants and stress tolerance. Trends in Plant Science. 7:405–410.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Mukherjee, S.P., Choudhuri, M.A. 1983. Implications of water stress induced changes in the levels of endogenous ascorbic acid and hydrogen peroxide in Vigna seedlings. Physiologia Plantarum 58:166–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nakano, Y., Asada, K. 1981. Hydrogen peroxide is scavenged by ascorbate-specific peroxidase in spinach chloroplasts. Plant Cell Physiol. 22:867–880.Google Scholar
  37. Nayyar, H., Gupta, D. 2006. Differential sensitivity of C3 and C4 plants to water deficit stress: association with oxidative stress and antioxidants. Environ. and Exp. Bot. 58:106–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Polit, S., Krupa, Z. 2006. Lipid peroxidation in cadmium-treated Phaseolus coccineus plants. Ach. Environ. Contamination and Toxicol. 50:482–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Premchandra, G.S., Sameoka, H., Ogata, S. 1990. Cell osmotic membrane-stability, an indication of drought tolerance, as affected by applied nitrogen in soil. J. Agricult. Res. 115:63–66.Google Scholar
  40. Qian, H., Li, J., Sun, L., Chen, W., Sheng, G.D., Liu, W., Fu, Z. 2009. Combined effect of copper and cadmium on Chlorella vulgaris growth and photosynthesis-related gene transcription. Aquatic Toxicol. 94:56–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Racker, E. 1962. Ribulose diphosphate carboxylase from spinach leaves. Methods Enzymol. 5:266–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rahoui, S., Chaoui, A., Ferjani, E.E. 2010. Membrane damage and solute leakage from germinating pea seed under cadmium stress. J. Hazardous Materials 78:1128–1131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rellán-Álvarez, R., Ortega-Villasante, C., Álvarez-Fernández, A., Campo, F.F.D., Hernández, L.E. 2006. Stress responses of Zea mays to cadmium and mercury. Plant and Soil 279:41–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sedlack, J., Lindsay, R.H. 1968. Estimation of total protein bound and non-protein sulfhydryl groups in tissues with Ellman’s reagent. Ann. Biochem. 25:192–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Shah, K., Kumar, R.G., Verma, S., Dubey, R.S. 2001. Effect of cadmium on lipid peroxidation, superoxide anion generation and activities of antioxidant enzymes in growing rice seedlings. Plant Sci. 161:1135–1144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tiryakioglu, M., Eker, S., Ozkutlu, F., Husted, S., Cakmak, I. 2006. Antioxidant defense system and cadmium uptake in barley genotypes differing in cadmium tolerance. J. Trace Elements in Medicine and Biol. 26:181–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. UNEP 1999. Manual on the biomarkers recommended for the MEDPOL biomonitoring programme, by the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP). Mediterranean Action Plan, MED POL, RAMOGE, 1999, MAP special publications. 92 pp.Google Scholar
  48. Viarengo, A., Ponzano, E., Donder, F., Fabbri, R. 1997. A simple spectrophotomtertic method of metallothionein evaluation in marine organisms: an application to Mediterranean and Antarctic molluscs. Marine Environ. Res. 44:69–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wong, H.L., Sakamoto, T., Kawasaki, T., Umemura, K., Shimamoto, K.O. 2004. Down-regulation of metallothionein, a reactive oxygen scavenger, by the small GTPase OsRac1 in rice. Plant Physiol. 35:1447–1456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wójcik, M., Tukendorf, A. 1999. Cd-tolerance of maize, rye and wheat seedlings. Acta Physiol. Plant 21:99–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Zhang, R.Q., Tang, C.F., Wen, S.Z., Liu, Y.G., Li, K.L. 2006. Advances in research on genetically engineered plants for metal resistance. Journal of Integrative Biology 48:1257–1265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest 2012

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Goel
    • 2
  • J. A. Malik
    • 2
  • R. Awasthi
    • 2
  • R. Sandhir
    • 1
  • H. Nayyar
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of BotanyPanjab UniversityChandigarhIndia
  2. 2.Department of BiochemistryPanjab UniversityChandigarhIndia

Personalised recommendations