Clothianidin, a New Neonicotinoid Insecticide for the Management of Foliar Aphid Complex of Wheat in India and Its Safety to Coccinellid Predators

Abstract

Foliar aphid complex is becoming a major constraint of wheat production in India. The only option available to manage them is the use of insecticides. In this endeavor, the All India Coordinated Wheat and Barley Improvement Programme (AICW&BIP) has recommended traditional insecticides viz., dimethoate, oxydemeton methyl etc. Insecticide resistance and dearth of new molecules created a need to identify newer molecules for wheat aphid control. Recently, the neonicotinoids, viz., imidacloprid and thiamethoxam were recommended for the control of foliar aphids by the AICW&BIP. To broaden the base of these molecules, clothianidin, a new molecule, belonging to the neonicotinoids was evaluated at three locations viz., Ludhiana, Karnal and Niphad for two years. It was found that the new molecule was highly effective at 35 g/ha in controlling the foliar aphids and reducing the yield losses. The new molecule was found safe under field conditions but in vitro studies showed that it was relatively toxic to the coccinellid beetles. The feeding preference study showed that the treated leaves were not fed by aphids up to seven days after treatment. No phytotoxicity was observed on the plants even when they were sprayed at very high concentrations.

References

  1. Anonymous 2006. Package of practices for crops of Punjab. Rabi. Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, India, pp. 1–20.

  2. Cloyd, R.A., Dickinson, A. 2006. Effect of insecticides on mealybug destroyer (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) and parasitoid Leptomastix dactylopii (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae), natural enemies of citrus mealybug (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae). J. Economic Entomol. 99:1596–1604.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cutler, G., Christopher, S.D., Cynthia, D. 2007. Exposure to clothianidin seed-treated canola has no long-term impact on honey bees. J. Economic Entomol. 100:765–772.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Frank, J.B., Nick C.T., Anthony, A.U., Joseph, G.M. 2007. Toxicity of systemic neonicotinoid insecticides to avocado thrips in nursery avocado trees. Pest Management Sci. 63:860–866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Heinrichs, E.A. 1986. Perspectives and directions for the continued development of insect-resistant rice varieties. Agricult., Ecosystems and the Environ. 18:9–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mhaske, B.M., Pardeshi, S.R., Bhoite, K.D., Rasal, P.N. 2007. Biosafety of coccinellid predators and chemical control of wheat aphids. Agricult. Sci. Digest. 27:264–266.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Patil, S.D., Rasal, P.N., Babu, K.S., Shambharkar, D.A., Game, B.C. 2009. Efficacy of different newer chemicals and seed treatment against foliage feeding wheat aphids. Int. J. Plant Protec. 2:271–275.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Plapp, F.W. Jr., Vinson S.B. 1977. Comparitive toxicities of some insecticides to the tobacco budworm and its Ichneumonid parasite, Campoletis sonorensis (Cameron). Environ. Entomol. 6:381–84.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Vastrad, A.S. 2003. Neonicotinoids — Current success and future outlook. Pestology 27:60–63.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Srinivasa Babu.

Rights and permissions

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Babu, K.S., Singh, B., Mhaske, B. et al. Clothianidin, a New Neonicotinoid Insecticide for the Management of Foliar Aphid Complex of Wheat in India and Its Safety to Coccinellid Predators. CEREAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS 40, 296–303 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1556/CRC.40.2012.2.14

Download citation