Advertisement

Cereal Research Communications

, Volume 40, Issue 2, pp 277–284 | Cite as

Effects of the Time of the Application and the Form of Nitrogen on Maize Inbred Lines Yield and 1000-Grain Weight

  • Z. HojkaEmail author
Article

Abstract

The study was carried out in the experimental filed of the Maize Research Institute, Zemun Polje, on calcareous chernozem in the period 2001–2003. The grain yield and thousand grain weight of two maize inbred lines (IL1 — FAO 400 and IL2 — FAO 600) were observed in dependence on the time of nitrogen application and forms of nitrogen applied.

Regarding time of fertilisation, the highest average grain yield was obtained by the use of Nmin method. Regarding the kind of nitrogen fertilisers, the highest average grain yield of observed maize inbred lines (3,264 kg ha−1) was obtained by the application of ammonium-sulphate in the primary autumn tillage (Nautumn). The use of the Nmin method (N ranging from 17 to 35 kg ha−1, in dependence on the soil mineral nitrogen content), especially in years with lower precipitation sums, resulted in the highest increase in grain yield (39.2%) and 1000-grain weight (3.2%) in observed maize inbred lines compared with the controls. The application of different forms of nitrogen did not result in statistically significant differences in 1000-grain weight in analysed maize inbred lines.

Keywords

nitrogen time of nitrogen application nitrogen form maize inbred lines grain yield 1000-grain weight 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Binder, D.L., Sander, D.H., Walters, D.T. 2000. Maize response to time of nitrogen application as affected by level of nitrogen deficiency. Agron. J. 92:1228–1236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bundy, L.G. 1986. Timing nitrogen applications to maximize fertilizer efficiency and crop response in conventional corn production. Review. J. Fert. Issues 3:99–106.Google Scholar
  3. Cirilo, A.G., Andrade, E.H. 1994. Sowing date and maize productivity: II. Kernel number determination. Crop Sci. 34:1044–1046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cirovic, M. 1985. Investigation of maize inbred lines biological traits in different plant densities with and without irrigation. PhD Thesis, University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Agriculture.Google Scholar
  5. Eviner, V.T., Chapin, F.S. 1997. Plant-microbial interactions. Nature 385:26–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gotlin, J., Pucaric, A., Varga, B. 1981. Effects of nitrogen fertilization on yield and yield components of different maturity groups maize hybrids. Proceedings of Symposium “Possibilities of effective utilisation of ecosystems”, Matica Srpska, Novi Sad, Serbia, pp. 389–400.Google Scholar
  7. Josipovic, M., Kovacevic, V., Petosic D., Sostaric, Jasna 2005. Wheat and maize yield variations in the Brod-Posavina area. Cereal Res. Commun. 33:229–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jovin, P., Veskovih, M. 1997. Effects of plant density and mineral fertilizers rates on yield and kernel number in seed maize. Plant Breeding and Seed Production 4(3–4):93–97.Google Scholar
  9. Kling, J.G., Okoruwa, A.E. 1994. Influence of variety and environment on maize grain quality for food uses in Africa. Agronomy Abstracts. ASA, Madison, WI, USA. p. 119.Google Scholar
  10. Maksimovic, L. 1997. Effects of pre-irrigation moisture and fertilizing on yield and some morphological traits of maize. Yugoslav Society of Soil Science, Novi Sad, Yugoslavia, pp. 651–656.Google Scholar
  11. Mead, R., Curnow, R.N., Hasted, A.M. 1996. Statistical methods in agricultural and experimental biology. Chapman & Hall, London, UK.Google Scholar
  12. Miric, M., Brkic, M. 2002. Seed processing. Serbian Society of Plant Breeders and Seed Producers, pp. 22–67.Google Scholar
  13. Nelson, W.W., MacGregor, J.M. 1973. Twelve years of continuous corn fertilization with ammonium nitrate or urea nitrogen. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 37:583–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Okoruwa, A.E. 1997. Enhancing maize processing and utilization in West and Central Africa. In: Badu-Apraku, B. et al. (eds), Contributing to food self-sufficiency: maize research and development in West and Central Africa. Proc. Regional Maize Workshop. IITA. Cotonou, Benin Republic, 29 May–2 June 1995. WECAMAN/IITA, Nigeria, pp. 108–119.Google Scholar
  15. Polito, T.A., Voss, R.D. 1991. Corn yield response to varied producer-controlled factors and weather in high yield environments. J. Prod. Agric. 4:51–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Purcino, A.A.C., Silva, M.R., Andrade, S.R.M., Belele, C.I., Parentoni, S.N., dos Santos, M.X. 2000. Grain filling in maize: The effect of nitrogen nutrition on the activities of nitrogen assimilating enzymes in the Pedicel-placento-chalaza region. Maydica 45:95–103.Google Scholar
  17. Randall, G.W., Iragavarapu, T.K., Bock, B.R. 1997. Nitrogen application methods and timing for corn after soybean in a ridge-tillage system. J. Prod. Agric. 10:300–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Randall, G.W., Vetsch, J.A., Huffman, J.R. 2003. Nitrate losses in subsurface drainage from a corn-soybean rotation as affected by time of nitrogen application and use of nitrapyrin. J. Environ. Qual. 32:1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Scharf, P.C., Wiebold, W.J., Lory, J.A. 2002. Maize response to time of nitrogen application as affected by level of nitrogen deficiency. Agron. J. 92:1228–1236.Google Scholar
  20. Shaw, R. H. 1988. Climatic requirement. In: Sprague, G.F. (ed.), Corn and Corn Improvement. Agronomy Monograph, No. 18. ASA-CSSA-SSSA, Madison, WI, USA, pp. 609–638.Google Scholar
  21. Smith, S.E., Roth, G.W., Beegle, D.B., Knievel, D.P. 1996. Effects of delaying N on corn growth and yield. In: Agronomy Abstracts. ASA, Madison, WI, USA, p. 248.Google Scholar
  22. Uhart, S.A., Andrade, F.H. 1995. Nitriogen deficiency in maize: I. Effects on crop growth, development, dry matter partitioning and kernel set. Crop Sci. 35:1376–1383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Vetsch, J.A., Randall, G.W. 2004. Corn production as affected by nitrogen application timing and tillage. Agron. J. 96:502–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of BiofarmingMegatrend UniversityBacka TopolaSerbia

Personalised recommendations