Advertisement

Cereal Research Communications

, Volume 40, Issue 2, pp 256–266 | Cite as

Diversity of Natural Enemy under Different Insecticide Regimes in Irrigated Rice Production System of Punjab, India

  • P. S. SaraoEmail author
  • M. S. Mahal
Article

Abstract

The effect of different chemical insecticides, viz. monocrotophos 36 SL, chlorpyriphos 20 EC, triazophos 40 EC, imidacloprid 200 SL, endosulfan 35 EC, Quinalphos 25 EC, Methyl parathion 50 EC and cartap hydrochloride 4 G on natural enemy fauna and their diversity were studied at different crop growth stages, viz. vegetative, maximum tillering and booting in irrigated rice production system of Punjab, India for two wet seasons. Sampling of natural enemy fauna was done at 3 and 10 days after application. Cartap hydrochloride and endosulfan were safe for the natural enemy fauna among different insecticides tested, while in most of observations chlorpyriphos and methy1 parathion were found to be toxic. Natural enemy diversity was maximum in cartap hydrochloride (1.803–1.943), endosulfan (1.437–1.833) and imidacloprid (1.550–1.847) treated plots at all the three phenophases under study. Least diversity was observed in monocrotophos (1.195–1.335), chlorpyriphos (1.002–1.429) and methyl parathion (0.861–1.522) treated plots.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Supplementary material

42976_2012_40020256_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (22 kb)
Supplementary material, approximately 228 KB.

References

  1. Anonymous 2009. Package of Practices for Kharif Crops. Ludhhiana: Punjab Agricultural University, 23 pp.Google Scholar
  2. Arida, G.S., Shepard, B.M. 1990. Parasitism and predation of rice leaffolders, Marasmia patnalis (Bradlay) and Cnaphalocrocis medinalis (Guenee) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in Laguna Province, Philippines. J. Agric. Ent. 7:113–118.Google Scholar
  3. Borah, B.K., Saharia, D. 1989. Impact of parasitoids in suppressing rice leaf-folder, Cnaphalocrocis medinails Guenee. J. Res. Assam Agric. Univ. 10:19–24.Google Scholar
  4. Chen, B.H., Chiu, S.C. 1979. The annual occurrence of Lycosa and Oedothorax spiders and their response to insecticides. J. Agric. Res. China 28:285–290.Google Scholar
  5. Gomez, K.A., Gomez, A.A. 1984. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. 2nd ed. Wiley-Interscience, New York, USA, 653 pp.Google Scholar
  6. Katti, G., Pasalu, I.C., Varma, N.R.G., Dhandapani, N. 2001. Quantification of natural biological control in rice ecosystem for possible exploitation in rice IPM. Indian J. Ent. 63:439–448.Google Scholar
  7. Kaur, S., Brar, K.S., Shenhmar, M. 2003. Abundance of spiders in rice ecosystem in Punjab. J. Insect Sci. 16:90–91.Google Scholar
  8. Krishnaiah, N.V., Lakshmi, V.J., Pasalu, I.C., Katti, G., Padmavathi, C. 2008. Insecticides in Rice IPM Past, Present and Future. Directorate of Rice Research, Hyderabad, India, 146 pp.Google Scholar
  9. Kumar, M.G., Velusamy, R. 1997. Toxicity of insecticides to three spiders in rice fields. Madras Agric. J. 84:366–368.Google Scholar
  10. Lakshmi, J.V., Krishnaiah, N.V., Pasalu, I.C., Katti, G. 2008. Potential toxicity of selected insecticides to rice leafhoppers and planthoppers and their important natural enemies. In: Int. Symp. on Agrochemicals Protecting Crop, Health and Natural Environ. Soc. for Pesticide Sci., IARI, N.Delhi 8–11 January, p. 217.Google Scholar
  11. Mahal, M.S., Kajal, V.K., Kaur, R., Singh, R. 2006. Integration of chemical and biocontrol approaches for the management of leaffolder, Cnaphalocrocis medinalis Guenee and stem borer, Scirpophaga incertulas Walker on basmati rice. J. Bio. Control 20:1–6.Google Scholar
  12. Patel, M.L., Patel, K.G., Pandya, H.V. 2005. Effect of insecticides commonly used for the control of insect pests of paddy on spiders. Insect Envir. 10:171–174.Google Scholar
  13. Pielou, E.J. 1966. The measurement of diversity in different types of biological collections. J. Theor. Biol. 13:131–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Puri, S.N., Murthy, K.S., Sharma, O.P. 1999. Pest problems in India — current status. Indian J. Pl. Prot. 27:20–31.Google Scholar
  15. Settle, W.H., Ariawan, H., Astuti, E.T., Cahyana, W., Hakim, A.L., Hindayana, D., Lestari, A.S., Pajarningsih. 1996. Managing tropical rice pests through conservation of generalist natural enemies and alternative prey. Ecology 77:1975–1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Shannon, C.E., Weaver, W. 1949. The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press. Urbana, OH, USA, 117 pp.Google Scholar
  17. Singh, D.P., Sharma, D.R. 1998. Selectivity of different insecticides to egg parasitoid, Telenomus dignoides (Nixon) of yellow stem borer. Indian J. Ecol. 25:74–76.Google Scholar
  18. Singh, D.P., Sharma, D.R., Singh, J., Narang, D.D. 2003. Field efficacy of cartap hydrochloride on basmati against Scirpophaga incertulas (Walker) and its egg parasitoid, Telenomus dignoides Nixon. J. Res. Punjab Agric. Univ. 40:27–32.Google Scholar
  19. Singh, J., Sukhija, H.S., Singh, P., Dhaliwal, G. S. 1994. Effect of insecticides on Telenomus dignoides Nixon, an egg parasitoid of yellow stem borer, Scirpophaga incertulas (Walker) of rice. Pest Mgmt. Econ. Zool. 2:14–149.Google Scholar
  20. Southwood, T.R.E. 1978. Ecological Methods with particular Reference to the Study of Insect Populations. The English Language Book Society and Chapman and Hall, London, UK.Google Scholar
  21. Srinivas, K., Madhumathi, T. 2005. Effect of insecticide applications on the predator population in rice ecosystem of Andhra Pradesh. Pest Mgmt. Econ. Zool. 13:71–75.Google Scholar
  22. Tanaka, K., Endo, S., Kazano, H. 2000. Toxicity of insecticides to predators of rice planthoppers: Spiders, the mirid bug and the dryinid wasp. Applied Ent. Zool. 35:177–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wang, H.Y, Yang, Y., Su, J.Y., Shen, J.L., Gao, C.F., Zhu, Y.C. 2008. Assessment of the impact of insecticides on Anagrus nilaparvatae (Pang et Wang) (Hymenoptera: Mymanidae), an egg parasitoid of the rice planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens (Hemiptera: Delphacidae). Crop Prot. 27:514–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Way, M.J., Heong, K.L. 1994. The role of bio-diversity in the dynamics and management of rice insect pests of tropical irrigated rice-a review. Bull. Ent. Res. 86:567–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ye, G.Y., Yao, H.W., Shu, Q.Y., Cheng, X., Hu, C., Xia, Y.W., Gao, M.W., Altosaar, I. 2003. High levels of stable resistance in transgenic rice with a synthetic cry 1Ab gene from Bacillus thuringiensis Berliner to rice leaffolder, Cnaphalocrocis medinalis (Guenee) under field conditions. Crop Prot. 22:171–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Zhu, Z.R., Shang, H.W., Cheng, J.A., Chen, X. 2000. Effects of methamidophos to Cnaphalocrocis medinalis on rice and its natural enemies. Plant Prot. 26:7–9.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Rice Section Department of Plant Breeding and GeneticsPunjab Agricultural UniversityLudhianaIndia
  2. 2.Department of EntomologyPunjab Agricultural UniversityLudhianaIndia

Personalised recommendations