Cereal Research Communications

, Volume 38, Issue 4, pp 550–559 | Cite as

Effect of maize crop residue density on Fusarium head blight and on deoxynivalenol contamination of common wheat grains

  • M. BlandinoEmail author
  • A. Pilati
  • A. Reyneri
  • D. Scudellari


Fusarium head blight (FHB) of small grain cereals is a worldwide disease that reduces yield and causes deoxynivalenol (DON) contamination in grains. Non-decomposed residues from the previous crop present on the soil surface are considered the principal inoculum sources for Fusarium graminearum and F. culmorum, the most important Fusarium species that cause FHB in Europe. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of the amount of previous residues on the FHB disease under natural conditions and on DON contamination in soft wheat following grain maize. Field experiments were conducted in two cropping seasons and two sites to compare four maize residue densities on the soil surface and in the first 10 cm of soil in tilled and non-tilled fields. Ploughing to a 30 cmdepth significantly reduced FHB severity (by 63%) and DON occurrence (by 80%) in each year and site. FHB severity and DON contamination significantly increased with the density of the residues left by the preceding crop. This study confirms that conservation tillage may increase DON concentration in wheat grain compared to ploughing which buries residues. This increase varies to a great extent not only because of the annual weather conditions and the nature of the preceding crop, but also because of the amount of infected crop residues remaining on the soil surface, which depends on the soil tillage methods and the preceding crop.


wheat Fusarium head blight crop residues deoxynivalenol mycotoxins tillage 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bateman, G.L., Murray, G., Gutteridge, R.J., Coskun, H. 1998. Effects of method of straw disposal and depth of cultivation on populations of Fusarium spp. in soil and on brown foot rot in continuous winter wheat. Ann. Appl. Biol. 132:35–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blandino, M., Minelli, L., Reyneri, A. 2006. Strategies for the chemical control of Fusarium head blight: Effect on yield, alveographic parameters and deoxynivalenol contamination in winter wheat grain. Eur. J. Agron. 25:193–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Champeil, A., Doré, T., Fourbet, J.F. 2004a. Fusarium head blight: Epidemiological origin of the effects of cultural practices on head blight attacks and the production of mycotoxins by Fusarium in wheat grains. Plant Sci. 166:1389–1415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Champeil, A., Fourbet, J.F., Doré, T., Rossignol, L. 2004b. Influence of cropping system on Fusarium head blight and mycotoxin levels in winter wheat. Crop Prot. 23:531–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dill-Macky, R., Jones, R.K. 2000. The effect of previous crop residues and tillage on Fusarium head blight of wheat. Plant Dis. 84:71–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fernandez, M.R., Huber, D., Basnyat, P., Zentner, R.P. 2008. Impact of agronomic practices on population of Fusarium and other fungi in cereal and noncereal crop residues on the Canadian Prairies. Soil Till. Res. 100: 60–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Koch, H.J., Pringas, C., Maerlaender, B., 2006. Evaluation of environmental and management effects on Fusarium head bligh infection and deoxynivalenol concentration in the grain of winter wheat. Eur. J. Agron. 24:357–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Khonga, E.B., Sutton, J.C. 1988. Inoculum production and survival of Gibberella zeae in maize and wheat residues. Can. J. Plant Pathol. 10:232–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lancashire, P.D., Bleiholder, H., Longelüddcke, P., Stauss, R., Van Den Boom, T., Weber, E., Witzenberger, A. 1991. An uniform decimal code for growth stages of crops and weeds. Ann. Appl. Biol. 119:561–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Maiorano, A., Blandino, M., Reyneri, A., Vanara, F. 2008. Effects of maize residues on the Fusarium spp. infection and deoxynivalenol (DON) contamination of wheat grain. Crop Prot. 27:182–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mayerle, M., Pancaldi, D., Haidukowski, M., Pascale, M., Ravaglia, S. 2007. Fusariosi e grano tenero: Quali sono le varietà più resistenti (Fusarium head blight and common wheat: Which varieties are most resistant). L’Inf. Agr. 32:45–49. (In Italian)Google Scholar
  12. Miller, J.D., Culley, J., Fraser, K., Hubbard, S., Meloche, F., Ouellet, T., Seaman, L., Seifert, K.A., Turkington, K., Voldeng, H. 1998. Effect of tillage practice on Fusarium head blight of wheat. Can. J. Plant. Pathol. 20:95–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Obst, A., Lepschy-von Gleissenthall, J., Beck, R. 1997. On the aetiology of Fusarium head blight of wheat in South Germany — preceding crops, weather conditions for inoculum production and head infection, proneness of the crop to infection and mycotoxin production. Cereal Res. Commun. 25:699–703.Google Scholar
  14. Osborne, L.E., Stein, J.M. 2007. Epidemiology of Fusarium head blight on small-grain cereals. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 119:103–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Parry, D.W., Jenkinson, P., Mcleod, L. 1995. Fusarium ear blight (Scab) in small-grain cereals — A review. Plant Pathol. 44:207–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Pereyra, S.A., Dill-Macky, R. 2008. Colonization of the residues of diverse plant species by Gibberella zeae and their contribution to Fusarium head blight inoculum. Plant Dis. 92:800–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pirgozliev, S.R., Edwards, S.G., Hare, M.C., Jenkinson, P. 2003. Strategies for the control of Fusarium head blight in cereals. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 109:731–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Schaafsma, A.W., Tamburic-Illic, L., Miller, J.D., Hooker, D.C. 2001. Agronomic consideration for reducing deoxynivalenol in wheat grain. Can. J. Plant. Pathol. 23:279–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Steinkellner, S., Langer, I. 2004. Impact of tillage on the incidence of Fusarium spp. in soil. Plant Soil 267:13–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sutton, J.C. 1982. Epidemiology of wheat head blight and maize ear rot caused by Fusarium graminearum. Can. J. Plant Pathol. 4:195–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Teich, A.H., Hamilton, J.R. 1985. Effect of cultural practices, soil phosphorus, potassium, and pH on the incidence of Fusarium Head Blight and deoxynivalenol level in wheat. Appl. Environ. Microb. 6:1429–1431.Google Scholar
  22. Teich, A.H., Nelson, K. 1984. Survey of Fusarium head blight and possible effects of cultural practices in wheat fields in Lambton County in 1983. Can. Plant Disease Survey 6:11–13.Google Scholar
  23. Wagacha, J.M., Muthomi, J.W. 2007. Fusarium culmorum: Infection process, mechanisms of mycotoxin production and their role in pathogenesis in wheat. Crop Prot. 26:877–885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Yi, C., Kaul, H.P., Kuebler, E., Schwadorf, K., Aufhammer, W. 2001. Head blight (Fusarium graminearum) and deoxynivalenol concentration in winter wheat as affected by pre-crop, soil tillage and nitrogen fertilization. J. Plant Dis. Protect. 1 08:217–230.Google Scholar
  25. Yuen, G.Y., Schoneweis, S.D. 2007. Strategies for managing Fusarium head blight and deoxynivalenol accumulation in wheat. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 119:126–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Xu, X.M. 2003. Effects of environmental conditions on the development of Fusarium ear blight. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 109:683–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Blandino
    • 1
    Email author
  • A. Pilati
    • 1
  • A. Reyneri
    • 1
  • D. Scudellari
    • 2
  1. 1.Dipartimento di Agronomia, Selvicoltura e Gestione del TerritorioUniversità degli Studi di TorinoGrugliasco (TO)Italy
  2. 2.Centro Ricerche Produzioni Vegetali Soc. Coop.Faenza (RA)Italy

Personalised recommendations