Cereal Research Communications

, Volume 38, Issue 3, pp 345–352 | Cite as

Studies on some nutritional quality parameters of organically or conventionally grown wheat

  • Y. S. ShivayEmail author
  • R. Prasad
  • A. Rahal


Wheat grain samples were drawn from a field experiment conducted for 2 years at the Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India to study protein, hardness score index, sedimentation value, Zn and Fe concentration in organically and conventionally grown wheat. An aestivum and a durum cultivar were included in the study. Protein concentration in both the cultivars was more in conventionally grown than in organically grown wheat. Grain hardness was not influenced by nutrient management but sedimentation value was higher when wheat was conventionally grown. On the other hand, Zn concentration in both the cultivars was more in organically grown (with farmyard manure) than in conventionally grown wheat. Application of Azotobacter reduced Zn concentration in both the cultivars. The two cultivars, however, differed in respect of Fe concentration in wheat grain. Triticum aestivum cultivar ‘HD 2733’ had significantly more Fe in wheat grain when organically grown compared to that when grown conventionally, while the reverse was true in the case of Triticum durum cultivar ‘PDW 215’. Azotobacter inoculation reduced Fe concentration in wheat in both the cultivars; reduction was more in Azotobacter culture W5.


organic wheat protein hardness sedimentation zinc iron Azotobacter nitrogen fertilization 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Behera, U.K., Saiprasad, S.V., Pradhan, S. 2008. Nitrogen scheduling for improving productivity and quality of durum wheat (Triticum turgidum) in central India. Indian J. Agric. Sci. 78: 599–603.Google Scholar
  2. Black, R.E., Lindsay, H.A., Bhutta, Z.A., Caulfield, L.E., DeOnnis, M., Ezzati, M., Mathers, C., Rivera, J. 2008. Maternal and child under-nutrition: Global and regional exposures and health consequences. Lancet 371: 243–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cakmak, I., Sari, N., Marschner, H., Kalayci, M., Yolmay, A., Eker, S., Gulut, K.Y. 1996. Dry matter production and distribution of zinc in bread and durum wheat genotypes differing in zinc efficiency. Plant Soil 180: 173–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cakmak, I. 2009. Enrichment of fertilizers with zinc: An excellent investment for humanity and crop production in India. J. Trace Elements Med. Biol. 23: 281–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gibson, R.S., Hotz, C., Temple, L., Yendall, F., Muttumuni, B., Ferguson, E. 2003. Dietary strategies to combat deficiencies of iron, zinc and vitamin A in developing centres: Development, implementation, monitoring and evaluation. Food Nutr. Bull. 21: 2219–2231.Google Scholar
  6. Giroux, M.J., Morris, C.F. 1998. Wheat grain hardness results from highly conserved mutation in the friabilin components purofindoline a and b. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., USA 95: 6262–6266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gomez, K.A., Gomez, A.A. 1984. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. 2nd edn. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, USA, pp. 130–186.Google Scholar
  8. Johansson, E. 2002. Effect of two wheat genotypes and Swedish environment on falling number, amylase activities and protein concentration and composition. Euphytica 126: 143–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lakshminarayana, K., Narula, N., Hooda, I.S., Faroda, A.S. 1992. Nitrogen economy in wheat (Triticum aestivum) through use of Azotobacter chroococcum. Indian J. Agric. Sci. 62: 75–76.Google Scholar
  10. Latham, M.C. 1986. Malnutrition the planet’s problem. Human Eco. Forum 15: 1–53.Google Scholar
  11. McDonald, G.K. 1992. Effects of nitrogenous fertilizer on the growth, grain yield and grain protein concentration of wheat. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 43: 949–967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mishra, B.K, Gupta, R.K. 1995. Protocols for evaluation of wheat quality. Directorate of Wheat Research, Karnal, India. Bull. 3: 98.Google Scholar
  13. Mishra, B.N., Prasad, R., Gangaiah, B. 2004. Organic manures for increased rice productivity and sustained supply of Fe to rice. Acta Agron. Hungarica 52: 371–397.Google Scholar
  14. Morris, C.F., Rose, S.P. 1996. Cereal Grain Quality. Chapman and Hall, New York, USA, pp. 3–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Prasad, R. 2003. Protein-energy malnutrition and fertilizer use in India. Fert. News 48: 13–23.Google Scholar
  16. Prasad, R. 2005. Organic farming vis-à-vis modern agriculture. Curr. Sci. 89: 252–253.Google Scholar
  17. Prasad, R. 2006. Zinc in soils and in plant, human and animal nutrition. Indian J. Fert. 2: 103–119.Google Scholar
  18. Prasad, R., Shivay, Y.S., Kumar, D., Sharma, S.N. 2006. Learning by Doing Exercises in Soil Fertility (A Practical Manual for Soil Fertility). Division of Agronomy, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India, 68 pp.Google Scholar
  19. Premuzic, S., Bargiela, M., Garcia, A., Iorio, A. 1998. Calcium, iron, potassium, phosphorus and vitamin C content of organic and hydroponic tomatoes. Hort. Sci. 33: 255–257.Google Scholar
  20. Rengel, Z., Romheld, V., Marschner, H. 1998. Uptake of zinc and iron by wheat genotypes differing in tolerance to zinc deficiency. J. Plant Physiol. 18: 433–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Scialabba, E.N., Hattam, C. (eds). 2002. Organic Agriculture, Environment and Food Security, FAO, Rome, Italy, 252 pp.Google Scholar
  22. Steven, F.J. 1991. Organic matter-micronutrient reactions in soil. In: Mortvedt, J.J., Cox, F.R., Shuman, L.M., Welch, R.M. (eds), Micronutrients in Agriculture. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI, USA, pp. 145–186.Google Scholar
  23. Surinder, S. 2008. Area under organic farming expands seven-fold in five years. Business Standard. 9 December 2008. Available online.
  24. Swaminathan, M.S. 1996. Sustainable Agriculture — Towards Evergreen Revolution. Konark Pub. Co. Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, India, 219 pp.Google Scholar
  25. Warman, P.R., Havard, K.A. 1997. Yield, vitamin and mineral contents of organically and conventionally grown carrots and cabbage. Agric. Ecosys. Environ. 61: 155–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Weiser, H., Seilmier, W. 1998. The influence of nitrogen fertilization in quantities and proportions of different protein types in wheat flour. J. Sci. Food Agric. 76: 49–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Welch, R.M., Graham, R.D., Rengel, Z. 2002. Breeding crops for enhanced micronutrient content. Plant Soil 245: 205–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Woodward, H.J., Bly, A. 1998. Relationship of nitrogen management to winter wheat yield and grain protein in South Dakota. J. Plant Nutr. 21: 217–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of AgronomyIndian Agricultural Research InstituteNew DelhiIndia
  2. 2.Department of Animal Nutrition, College of Veterinary and Animal SciencesGovind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture & TechnologyPantnagarIndia

Personalised recommendations