Advertisement

Cereal Research Communications

, Volume 38, Issue 3, pp 440–448 | Cite as

Grain yield of B73 × Mo17-type maize hybrids from different periods of breeding

  • M. StojakovićEmail author
  • M. Ivanović
  • G. Bekavac
  • Ž. Stojaković
Breeding

Abstract

Hybrid maize is produced using inbred lines that originate from genetically different (divergent) sources (heterotic groups). Inbred lines from at least two different sources that produce heterotic F1 progeny make up a heterotic pair. Thus far, a large number of heterotic pairs differing in their heterotic potential for grain yield and other traits have been identified. The BSSS × Lancaster heterotic pair is often used in the temperate zone to develop medium-late to late maize hybrids beloning to FAO maturity groups 500 to 700.

The lines B73, Mo17 and derived lines are typical representatives of the BSSS × Lancaster heterotic pair. In order to determine the contribution of breeding to the increase of grain yield in B73 × Mo17 hybrids, lines had been introduced from America (the original versions of B73 and Mo17) or developed at the Institute of Field and Vegetable Crops in Novi Sad between 1980 and 2000 and represent three different cycles of selection. B73- and Mo17-type inbreds were used to study the combining abilities for grain yield of the lines and hybrids and assess the contributions of the selection cycles to grain yield increases in the lines and hybrids. With both types of germplasm, s the lines from the third cycle of selection had the highest grain yields. Based on the coefficient of linear regression, the increase of yield in the hybrids from the third selection cycle compared with the first cycle was found to be over 124 kg cycle with B73, and 677 kg cycle with Mo17 inbreds.

Keywords

maize hybrid breeding cycle grain yield 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Duvick, D.N. 1977. Genetic rates of gain in hybrid maize yields during 40 years. Maydica 22: 187–196.Google Scholar
  2. Hallauer, A.R., Miranda, J.F.B. 1981. Quantitative Genetics in Maize Breeding. Second Edition. Iowa State Univ. Press, Ames, Iowa, USA, 11: 375–405.Google Scholar
  3. Horner, E.S., Chapman, W.H., Lundy, H.W., Lutrick, M.C. 1973. Comparison of three methods of recurrent selection in maize. Crop Sci. 13: 485–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ivanović, M., Petrović, R., Drinić, G., Trifunović, V., Kojić, L., Vuković, M., Mišović, M., Radović, G., Ristanović, D., Pajić, Z., Trifunović, B., Jelovac, D. 1995. Fifty years of ZP maize hybrids breeding. Maize breeding, production and utilisation — 50 years of Maize research institute, Zemun Polje. Sept. 28–29. Belgrade, Yugoslavia, pp. 3–16.Google Scholar
  5. Ivanović, M., Vasić, N., Trifunović, V., Vidojević, Ž., Vuković, M., Jakovljević, L., Jovandić, N. 2002. Inbred lines of maize significants for Yugoslavian maize breeding program. A Periodical of Scientific Research on Field and Vegetable Crops, Novi Sad, Yugoslavia, 36: 301–310.Google Scholar
  6. Ivanović, M., Vasić, N., Jocković, Đ, Stojaković, M., Nastasić, A. 2006. Grain yield of NS maize hybrids representing different eras of breeding. A Periodical of Scientific Research on Field and Vegetable Crops, No. II, Novi Sad, Yugoslavia, 42: 15–20.Google Scholar
  7. Malvar, R.A., Ordas, A., Revilla, P., Cartea, M.E. 1996. Estimates of genetic variances in two Spanish populations in maize. Crop Sci. 36: 291–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Pavlićić, J., Trifunović, V. 1966. Contribution to the study of some more important ecological types of maize grown in Yugoslavia and their classification. Journal of Scientific Agricultural Research 19(66): 44–62.Google Scholar
  9. Radovic, G., Jelovac, D. 1995. Identification of the heterotic pattern in Yugoslav maize germ plasm. Maydica 40: 223–227.Google Scholar
  10. Russell, W.A. 1972. Registration of B70 and B73 parental lines of maize. Crop Sci. 12: 721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Russell, W.A. 1974. Comparative performance for maize hybrids representing different eras of maize breeding. Ann. Corn and Sorghum Res. Conf. 29: 81–101.Google Scholar
  12. Singh, R.K., Chouduary, D. 1976. Biometrical methods in quantitative genetic analysis. International Bioscience Publisher, Hisar (India) 8: 145–153.Google Scholar
  13. Smith, J.S.C., Duvick, D.N., Smith, O.S., Grunst, A., Wall, S.J. 1999. Effect of hybrid breeding on genetic diversity in maize. In: Coors, J.G., Pandey, S. (eds), Genetics and Exploitation of Heterosis in Crops. Am. Soc. of Agronomy, Inc. Madison, Wisconsin, pp. 119–126.Google Scholar
  14. Smith, G.A., Hecker, R.J., Maag, G.W., Rasmuson, D.M. 1973. Combining ability and gene action estimates in an eight parent diallel cross of sugarbeet. Crop Sci. 13: 312–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Stojaković, M., Ivanović, M., Jocković, Đ, Vasić, N. 2007. Characteristics of reselected Mo17 and B73 inbred lines of maize. Maydica 52: 257–260.Google Scholar
  16. Steel, R.D.G., Torrie, J.H. 1980a. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. A Biometrical Aproach. Second Edition. McGrow-Hill Book Company, 9: 195–233.Google Scholar
  17. Steel, R.D.G., Torrie, J.H. 1980b. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. A Biometrical Aproach. Second Edition. McGrow-Hill Book Company, 10: 239–269.Google Scholar
  18. Šarić, T., Savić, R., Jakovljević, L. 1980. Breeding value of varieties, populations and ecotypes in Vojvodina. In: Proc. Maize Production, Processing and Using, Belgrade, 15–19, September 1980, pp. 71–80.Google Scholar
  19. Trifunović, V. 1986. 40 years of the modern maize breeding in Yugoslavia. In: Proc. Genetic and Breeding of Maize, Belgrade, 11–12. December 1986, pp. 5–46.Google Scholar
  20. Troyer, A.F. 1999. Background of U.S. hybrid corn. Crop Sci. 39: 601–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Troyer, A.F. 2000. Breeding temperate corn. In: Hallauer, A.R. (ed.), Specialty Corns. 2nd ed. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 394–466.Google Scholar
  22. Troyer, A.F., Roheford, T.R. 2002. Germplasm ownership: Related corn inbreds. Crop Sci. 42: 3–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Zambezi, B.T., Horner, E.S., Martin, F.G. 1986. Inbred lines as testers for general combining abitity in maize. Crop Sci. 26: 908–910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Zuber, M.S. 1973. Registration of 20 maize parental lines. Crop Sci. 13: 779–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Walejko, R.N., Russell, W.A. 1977. Evaluation of recurrent selection for specific combining ability in two open pollinated maize cultivars. Crop Sci. 17: 647–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Stojaković
    • 1
    Email author
  • M. Ivanović
    • 1
  • G. Bekavac
    • 1
  • Ž. Stojaković
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Field and Vegetable CropsNovi SadSerbia

Personalised recommendations