Advertisement

Cereal Research Communications

, Volume 38, Issue 1, pp 134–145 | Cite as

Grain weight of durum wheat cultivars released in Italy and Spain during the 20th century as affected by source-sink manipulations

  • Y. RharrabtiEmail author
  • D. J. Miralles
  • V. Martos
  • L. F. García del Moral
Agronomy

Abstract

The present work analysed whether grain weight is affected by changes in source:sink ratio in twenty-four durum wheat cultivars from Italy and Spain released through the 20th century grown under Mediterranean conditions. For this purpose, a field experiment was conducted during the 2002 growing-season in southeastern Spain. Sink strength was modified by removing half of the spikelets, of one side of the spike, one week after anthesis. Spikelet trimming had different effects on both average grain weight and individual grain weight at different positions within the spike. While old cultivars did not respond positively to spikelet trimming, and appear to be mainly sink-limited, intermediate and modern cultivars from Spain increased their grain weight in response to sink reductions, suggesting co-limitation by the sink and source. On the contrary, grain weight of intermediate and modern Italian cultivars remained relatively unchanged suggesting a sink-limitation to grain yield. The differential response to source-sink manipulations observed between Italian and Spanish cultivars could be attributed to their different genetic background, which determines their level of adaptation to harsh Mediterranean environments.

Keywords

grain weight source-sink manipulations durum wheat southeastern Spain Mediterranean conditions 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Acreche, M., Slafer, G.A. 2006. Grain weight response to increases in number of grains in wheat in a Mediterranean area. Field Crops Res. 98: 52–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Álvaro, F., Royo, C., García del Moral, L.F., Villegas, D. 2008. Grain filling and dry matter translocation responses to source-sink modifications in a historical series of durum wheat. Crop Sci. 48: 1523–1531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Austin, R.B., Ford, M.A., Morgan, C.L. 1989. Genetic improvement in the yield of winter wheat: a further evaluation. J. Agric. Sci. 112: 295–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blade, S.F., Baker, R.J. 1991. Kernel wheat response to source-sink changes in spring wheat. Crop Sci. 31: 1117–1120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Borghi, B. 2001. Italian wheat pool. In: Bonjean, A.P., William, J.A. (eds.), The World Wheat Book, A History of Wheat Breeding. Lavoisier Publishing, Paris, pp. 289–309.Google Scholar
  6. Borrás, L., Slafer, G.A., Otegui, M.E. 2004. Seed dry weight response to source-sink manipulations in wheat, maize and soybean: A quantitative reappraisal. Field Crops Res. 86: 131–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brancourt-Hulmel, M.D., Doussinault, G., Lecomte, C., Berard, P., Le Buanec, B., Trottet, M. 2003. Genetic improvement of agronomic traits of winter wheat cultivars released in France from 1946 to 1992. Crop Sci. 43: 37–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cartelle, J., Pedró, A., Savin, R., Slafer, G.A. 2006. Grain weight responses to post-anthesis spike-trimming in a traditional and a modern Mediterranean wheat. Eur. J. Agron. 25: 365–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. García del Moral, L.F., Ramos, J.M., García del Moral, M.B., Jimenez-Tejada, P. 1991. Ontogenetic approach to grain production in spring barley based on path-coefficient analysis. Crop Sci. 31: 1179–1185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. García del Moral, L.F., Rharrabti, Y., Villegas, D., Royo, C. 2003. Evaluation of grain yield and its components in durum wheat under Mediterranean conditions: An ontogenic approach. Agron. J. 95: 266–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Koshkin, E.I., Tararina, V.V. 1989. Yield and source-sink relations of spring wheat cultivars. Field Crops Res. 22: 297–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kruk, B.C., Calderini, D.F., Slafer, G.A. 1997. Grain weight in wheat cultivars released from 1920 to 1990 as affected by post-anthesis defoliation. J. Agric. Sci. 128: 273–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ma, Y.Z., MacKown, C.T., Van Sanfond, D.A. 1990. Sink manipulation in wheat: Compensatory changes in kernel size. Crop Sci. 30: 1099–1105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Martos, V., Royo, C., Rharrabti, Y., García del Moral, L.F. 2005. Using AFLPs to determine phylogenetic relationships and genetic erosion in durum wheat cultivars released in Italy and Spain throughout the 20th century. Field Crops Res. 91: 107–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. McCaig, T.N., Clarke, J.M. 1995. Breeding durum wheat in western Canada: historical trends in yield and related variables. Can. J. Plant Sci. 75: 55–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Miralles, D.J., Slafer, G.A. 1995. Individual grain weight responses to genetic reduction in culm length in wheat as affected by source-sink manipulations. Field Crops Res. 43: 55–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Miralles, D.J., Rharrabti, Y., Royo, C., Villegas, D., García del Moral, L.F. 2002. Grain setting strategies of Mediterranean durum wheat cultivars released in different periods (1900–2000). In: Genotype-phenotype: Narrowing the Gaps. Association of Applied Biologists. The Royal Agricultural College, Cirencester, UK.Google Scholar
  18. Miralles, D.J., Slafer, G.A. 2007. Sink limitations to yield in wheat: how could it be reduced? J. Agric. Sci. 145: 139–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Royo, C. 2005. Durum wheat improvement in Spain. In: Royo, C., Nachit, M.M., Di Fonzo, N., Araus, J.L., Pfeiffer, W.H., Slafer, G.A. (eds.), Durum Wheat Breeding: Current Approaches and Future Strategies. Food Products Press, New York, pp. 883–906.Google Scholar
  20. Royo, C., Álvaro, F., Martos, V., Ramdami, A., Isidro, J., Villegas, D., García del Moral, L.F. 2007. Genetic changes in durum wheat yield components and associated traits in Italy and Spain during the 20th century. Euphytica 155: 259–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. SAS Institute Inc. 2000. SAS OnlineDoc®, Version 8. Cary, NC, USA.Google Scholar
  22. Siddique, K.H.M., Belford, R.K., Perry, M.W., Tennant, D. 1989. Growth, development and light interception of old and modern wheat cultivars in a Mediterranean-type environment. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 40: 473–487.Google Scholar
  23. Slafer, G.A., Savin, R. 1994. Source-sink relationships and grain mass at different positions within the spike in wheat. Field Crops Res. 37: 39–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Voltas, J., Romagosa, I., Araus, J.L. 1997. Grain size and nitrogen accumulation in sink-reduced barley under Mediterranean conditions. Field Crops Res. 52: 117–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Y. Rharrabti
    • 1
    Email author
  • D. J. Miralles
    • 2
  • V. Martos
    • 1
  • L. F. García del Moral
    • 1
  1. 1.Dpto. de Fisiología Vegetal, Facultad de Ciencias, Instituto de BiotecnologíaUniversidad de GranadaGranadaSpain
  2. 2.Catedra de Cerealicultura, Dpto. de Producción Vegetal, IFEVA y CONICET, Facultad de AgronomíaUniversidad de Buenos AiresBuenos AiresArgentina

Personalised recommendations