Economic analysis of precision weed management

Abstract

The practical implementation of precision crop production nowadays is becoming more and more widespread. Numerous experiments and farmers’ practical experiences verify the positive impacts of precision nutrient supply on farming. Precision weed control started to spread later, partly due to technical difficulties, partly to the lack of necessary software support that was developed later. The introduction of a new technology requires complex farm-management decisions, including the consideration of economic correlations (costs-yield-income) as well as high-level skills and significant investments from the farmer. These investments can be returned from the income surplus realized through increasing yields and decreasing farming costs. Extra income can also come from the decreasing material costs which, however, do not necessarily compensate the extra costs of implementing the new technology and depends very much on the utilization of savings from different herbicide doses used for the treatment of plots, considering the soil qualities. This study, utilising the data of a technological experiment carried out in Hungary, presents the results of a stochastic simulation model developed with the adaptation of finite element method. The examination was executed at sub-plot level, dividing the plots into small parcels. Our aim was to examine the impact of precision nutrient application and differentiated spraying of herbicides on production costs and yield, as well as the impact of changes on gross margin (income) and the returns on technological development.

References

  1. Auernhammer, H. 2001. Precision farming — the environmental challenge. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 30:31–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Backes, M., Plümmer, L. 2005. Potential of 3D-weed density maps in precision farming. In: Proceeding of the 10th Scandinavian Research Conference on Geographical Information Sciences. Stockholm, pp. 147–152.

  3. Baranyai, Zs., Takács, I. 2007. Position of mechanisation in Hungarian agriculture. Cereal Res. Commun. 35:209–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Barosso, J., Fernandez-Quintanilla, C., Maxwell, B.D., Rew, L.J. 2004. Simulating the effects of weed spatial pattern and resolution of mapping and spraying on economics of site-specific management. Weed Res. 44:460–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Johnson, G., Cardina, J., Mortensen, D. 1997. Site-specific weed management? Current and future directions. In: Pierce, F., Sadler, E., Madison, J. (eds), The State of Site-Specific Management for Agriculture, pp. 131–147.

  6. Lowenberg-DeBoer, J., Swinton, S.M. 1997. Economics of site-specific management in agronomic crops. In: Pierce, F.J., Sadler, E., Madison, J. (eds), The State of Site-specific Management for Agriculture, pp. 369–396.

  7. Nagy, S., Reisinger, P., Tamás, J. 2004. Possibilities of the use of multispectral images for planning precision weed control. J. Plant Dis. Prot. XIX:453–458.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Reisinger, P., Kőmíves, T., Nagy, S. 2003. Studies focused on sample density in weed sampling related to the planning of precision weed management. (in Hungarian). Növényvédelem 39:413–419.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Reisinger, P., Lehoczky, É., Kőmíves, T. 2005. Relationships between soil characteristics and weeds. Comm. in Soil Sci. and Plant Analysis. 36:623–628.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Schmitz, P., Ko, J.-H. 2001. Economic costs of a ban or a tax on pesticides. In: German Agriculture — A CGE Approach. Unpublished report. Contact person: michael.schmitz@agrar.uni-giessen.de

  11. Swinton, S.M. 2005: Economics of site-specific weed management. Weed Sci. 53:259–263.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Swinton, S.M., Lowenberg-DeBoer, J. 1998. Profitability of site-specific farming. In: Site-specific Management Guidelines. Online: http://www.inpofos.org Download: 25.02.2008

  13. Takács-György, K., Reisinger, P., Takács, E., Takács, I. 2008. Economic analysis of precision plant protection by stochastic simulation based on finite elements method. J. Plant Dis. Prot. XXI:181–186.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Weiss, M.D. 1996. Precision farming and spatial economic analysis: Research challenges and opportunities. Am. J. Agr. Econ. 78:1275–1280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wiles, L. 2004. Economics of weed management: Principles and practices. Weed Sci. Weed Techn. 18:1403–1407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wolf, S.A., Buttel, F.H. 1996. The political economy of precision farming. Am. J. Agr. Econ. 78:1269–1274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Takács-György.

Rights and permissions

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Takács-György, K., Takács, I. Economic analysis of precision weed management. CEREAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS 37, 585–593 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1556/CRC.37.2009.4.13

Download citation

Keywords

  • precision weed control
  • simulation model
  • cost analysis