Advertisement

Cereal Research Communications

, Volume 37, Issue 2, pp 277–286 | Cite as

Effects of seed moisture and the rotary speed of a drum on the germination and vigour of naked and husked oat cultivars

  • A. ZielińskiEmail author
  • M. Moś
Breeding

Abstract

The viability of naked oat seeds can deteriorate during storage resulting in grain that is unsuitable for seed used in sowing the crop in the following year. This rapid deterioration has been linked to damage that occurs during harvest. The objective of the research was to determine the germination and vigour of naked oat seeds of cv. Akt, cv. Cacko, cv. Polar, the strain STH 4659, and husked seeds of cv. Bajka and cv. Skrzat, harvested at the moisture content ranging from 22.9% to 10.9%, subjected to threshing at two rotary speeds of the threshing unit: 1.6 m/s and 2.4 m/s. Seeds threshed manually at the same date were the control. The harvest carried out at the seed moisture content of 21.0% as well as the use of high rotary speed, i.e. 2.4 m/s resulted in a significantly higher number of injuries and, in consequence, a reduction in germination by 27% on average and in vigour by 48% on average of naked cultivars compared with seeds of the traditional cultivars.

Keywords

naked oat husked oat germination vigour Avena sativa L. harvest management 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Box, A.J., Jefferies, S.P., Barr, A.R. 1999. Emergence and establishment. Problems of Hulless Barley — A Possible Solution. In: Proceedings of the 9 th Australian Barley Technical Symposium, Melbourne.Google Scholar
  2. Commission Directive 93/2/EEC. 1993. Commission directive 93/2/EEC of 28 January 1993 amending Annex II to Council Directive 66/402/EEC on the marketing of cereal seed. OJ EC Nr L 054, p.20, 1993/03/05.Google Scholar
  3. Dvořáček, V., Čurn, V., Moudrý, J. 2003. Suitability of oat-seed storage-protein markers for identification of cultivars in grain and mixed flour samples J. Plant Soil Environ. 49:486–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gabrovská, D., Fiedlerová, V., Holasová, M., Mašková, E., Ouhrabková, J., Rysová, J., Winterová, R., Michalová, A. 2004. Nutritional changes of common oat (Avena sativa L.) and naked oat (Avena nuda L.) during germination. Czech J. of Food Sci. 22:317–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gieroba, J., Nowak, J., Dreszer, K. 1988. Effect of chosen factors on damage and biological value of combine-harvested grains. Post. Nauk Roln. 4:31–50.Google Scholar
  6. Hampton, J.G., Coolbear, P. 1990. Potential versus actual seed performance — can vigour testing provide and answer? Seed Sci. and Technol. 18:215–228.Google Scholar
  7. ISTA 1999. International Rules for Seed Testing. Seed Sci. and Technol. 27, Supplement.Google Scholar
  8. Kirkkari, A.M. 2001. Reducing grain damage in naked oat through gentle harvesting. Agric. and Food Sci. in Finland 10:223–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kolasińska, K., Boros, L. 2004. Effect of harvest and conditioning methods on the sowing value of naked and husked spring barley. Biul. IHAR 233:81–90.Google Scholar
  10. McDonald, M.B. 1975. A review and evaluation of seeds vigour tests. Proc. AOSA 65:109–139.Google Scholar
  11. McDonald, M.B., Wilson, D.O. 1980. Asa-610 ability to detect changes in soybean seed quality. J. Seed Technol. 5:56–65.Google Scholar
  12. Nita, Z. 1999. Present status and a new concept of oats breeding in Poland. Polskie Tow. Techn. Żywn. 1:186–193.Google Scholar
  13. Peltonen-Sainio, P., Kirkkari, A.M., Jauhiainen, L. 2004. Characterising strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats in producing naked oat as a novel crop for northern growing conditions. Agric. and Food Sci. 13:212–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Peltonen-Sainio, P., Muurinen, S., Vilppu, M., Rajala, A., Gates, F., Kirkkari, A.M. 2001. Germination and grain vigour of naked oat in response to grain moisture at harvest. J. Agric. Sci. Cambridge 137:147–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Perry, D.A. 1977. A vigour test for seeds of barley based on a measurement of plumule growth. Seed Sci. and Technol. 5:709–719.Google Scholar
  16. Stanton, T.R. 1923. Naked oats. J. Hered. 14:177–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Steel, R.G.D., Torrie, J.H. 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. McGraw-Hill Book Company, pp. 355–361.Google Scholar
  18. Strona, I.G. 1977. Seed Damage — Causes and Prevention. PWRiL, Warszawa.Google Scholar
  19. Thornton, M.S. 1986. Investigations into the Problems Associated with the Development of Naked Oats as a Crop. University of Wales, Aberystwyth.Google Scholar
  20. Valentine, J., Hale, O.D. 1990. Investigations into reduced germination of seed of naked oats. Plant Varieties and Seeds 3:21–30.Google Scholar
  21. Willenborg, C.J., Wildeman, J.C., Miller, A.K., Rossnagel, B.G., Shirtliffe, S.J. 2005. Oat germination characteristics differ among genotypes, seed sizes and osmotic potentials. Crop Sci. 45:2023–2029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Zieliński, A., Moś, M., Wójtowicz, T. 2007. Effect of grain moisture content and threshing cylinder speed on mechanical damage in naked oat cultivars. Electronic J. of Polish Agric. Universities 10 (4), http://www.ejpau.media.pl/.

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Plant Breeding and Seed ScienceAgricultural University in KrakowKrakówPoland

Personalised recommendations