Cereal Research Communications

, Volume 36, Supplement 6, pp 563–568 | Cite as

Integrated strategies for Fusarium head blight management in the United States

  • Marcia McMullen
  • S. Halley
  • B. Schatz
  • S. Meyer
  • J. Jordahl
  • J. Ransom
Open Access
Session 5 Epidemiology, Disease Forecasting and Agronomy Relations


Optimum management of Fusarium head blight in wheat and barley is best achieved with multiple strategies; a single strategy generally fails during epidemic conditions. Members of the management group of the US Wheat and Barley Scab Initiative established integrated management studies in 2007, across multiple regions and grain classes, to quantify the value of additive strategies for Fusarium head blight and deoxynivalenol reduction. Strategies studied were a combination of two or three of the following approaches: variety resistance, fungicides, and crop rotation. Results in the northern plains state of North Dakota indicated that the lowest field severity of Fusarium head blight and the lowest deoxynivalenol, and the highest yields and test weights were achieved with multiple, rather than single management strategies.


  1. Anderson, A. 1948. The development of Gibberella zeae head blight of wheat. Phtyopathology 38:595–611.Google Scholar
  2. Bai, G., Shaner, G. 1994. Scab of wheat; Prospects for control. Plant Disease 78:760–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Champeil, A., Dore, T., Fourbet, J.F. 2004. Fusarium head blight: epidemiological origin of the effects of cultural practices on head blight attacks and the production of mycotoxins by Fusarium in wheat grains. Plant Science 166:1389–1415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Champeil, A., Fourbet, J.F., Dore, T., Rossignol, L. 2003. Influence of cropping system on Fusarium head blight and mycotoxin levels in winter wheat. Crop Protection 23:531–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dill Macky, R., Jones, R. K. 2000. The effect of previous crop residues and tillage on Fusarium head blight of wheat. Plant Dis. 84:71–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Horsley, R.D., Pederson, J.D., Schwarz, P.B., McKay, K., Hochalter, M.R., McMullen, M.P. 2006. Integrated use of tebuconazole and Fusarium head blight-resistant barley genotypes. Agron. J. 98:194–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Mesterhazy, A. 2003. Control of Fusarium head blight of wheat by fungicides. Pages 363–380 in: Fusarium Head Blight of Wheat and Barley, Leonard, K. and Bushnell, W. eds. APS Press, St. Paul, MN.Google Scholar
  8. McMullen, M. 2007. Integrated strategies for FHB management, a Northern Great Plains Perspective. Pages 83–87 in: 5th Canadian Workshop on Fusarium Head Blight. Nov. 27–30, 2007, Winnipeg, Manitoba. Canadian Grain Commission, Winnipeg, Manitoba.Google Scholar
  9. Mergoum, M., Frohberg, R.C., Stack, R.W., Olson, T., Friesen, T.L. Rasmussen, J.B. 2006. Registration of ‘Glenn’ Wheat. Crop Sci. 46:473–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Nita, M., DeWolf, E., Madden, L., Paul, P., Shaner, G., Adhikari, T., Ali, S., Stein, Osborne, L. 2006. Effect of corn residue level, fungicide application, and cultivar resistance level on disease incidence and severity of Fusarium head blight and DON concentration. Page 46 in: Proc. 2006 National Fusarium Head Blight Forum, Dec. 10–12, 2006, Research Triangle Park, NC. East Lansing: Michigan State University.Google Scholar
  11. Obst, A., Lepschy-Von Gleissenthall, J., Beck, R. 1997. On the etiology of Fusarium head blight of wheat in south Germany. Cereal Res. Comm. 25:699–704.Google Scholar
  12. Paul, P.A., Lipps, P.E., Hershman, D.E., McMullen, M.P., Draper, M.A., Madden, L.V. 2007. A quantitative review of tebuconazole effect on Fusarium head blight and deoxynivalenol content in wheat. Phytopathology 97:211–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Parry, D.W., Jenkinson, P., McLeod, L. 1995. Fusarium ear blight (scab) in small grain cereals — a review. Plant Pathology 44:207–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Rioux, S. 2005. Previous crop residues and Fusarium head blight on cereals. Proc. 4th Canadian Workshop on Fusarium Head Blight, Ottawa, Ontario Canada, Nov. 1–3, 2005.Google Scholar
  15. Salas, B., Dill-Macky, R. 2005. Effect of residue management and host resistance on the epidemiology of Fusarium head blight. I n: Proc. of 2005 National Fusarium Head Blight Forum, Milwaukee, WI, Dec. 11–13, 2005. US Wheat and Barley Scab Initiative. Michigan State Univ., East Lansing, MI., pp. 144–146.Google Scholar
  16. Shaner, G., Buechley, G. 2000. Sampling spores of Fusarium graminearum. In: Proc. of 2000 National Fusarium Head Bight Forum, Erlanger, KY, Dec. 10–12, 2000. Michigan State Univ., East Lansing, MI., pp. 182–186.Google Scholar
  17. Sutton, J.C. 1982. Epidemiology of wheat head blight and maize ear rot caused by Fusarium graminearum. Can. J. Plant Pathology 4:195–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Vogelgsang, S, Forrer, H.R. 2005. Fusarium head blight and mycotoxins in cereals — potential strategies to control contamination under conservation tillage. Proc. 4th Canadian Workshop on Fusarium Head Blight, Ottawa, Ontario Canada, Nov. 1–3, 2005.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest 2008

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marcia McMullen
    • 1
  • S. Halley
    • 2
  • B. Schatz
    • 3
  • S. Meyer
    • 1
  • J. Jordahl
    • 1
  • J. Ransom
    • 4
  1. 1.Dept. of Plant PathologyNorth Dakota State UniversityFargoUSA
  2. 2.Langdon Research Extension CenterLangdonUSA
  3. 3.Carrington Research Extension CenterCarringtonUSA
  4. 4.Dept. of Plant SciencesNorth Dakota State UniversityFargoUSA

Personalised recommendations