Advertisement

Cereal Research Communications

, Volume 36, Issue 2, pp 343–352 | Cite as

Nitrogen Management and Wheat Genotype Performance in a Planting System on Narrow Raised Beds

  • A. Limon-OrtegaEmail author
  • E. Villaseñor-Mir
  • E. Espitia-Rangel
Article

Abstract

Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grain production in the Central Highlands of Mexico occurs under rainfed conditions. Traditionally this crop has been planted by conventional means in solid stands combined with heavy tillage and lack of ground cover. These practices have been leading to soil erosion in the sloping lands, frequent drought stress, and water logging after occasional heavy rainstorms in the low lands. To ameliorate those constrains, farmers have started to replace the traditional planting system by the planting system on narrow raised beds. However, information on N management and varieties is needed. This 5-yr study was conducted from 1999 to 2003 to test a set of eight wheat genotypes using a raised-bed system to evaluate their performance as affected by N fertilizer management. Three N rates (40, 70 and 100 kg N ha −1) were applied at planting, at the end of tillering-early jointing, and split at planting and at the end of tillering-early jointing. Treatments included an unfertilized check plot. Results indicated that the optimum N fertilizer rate for wheat grain production varies from 0 to 40 kg N ha −1) depending upon the variety. Nitrogen timing practices had no effect on grain yield but on N use efficiency (NUE). The split application of 40 kg N ha −1 increased the NUE. Higher N rates reduced the NUE irrespective of the N timing practice. According to the differential performance among varieties, this study showed that the planting system on narrow raised beds is a variety-specific technology. The relative grain yield, stability, and NUE, indicated that Tlaxcala F2000, Nahuatl F2000 and Romoga F96 are the most adequate varieties for the planting system on narrow raised beds in the Central Highlands of Mexico.

Keywords

bed planting system narrow raised beds N management N use efficiency wheat 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Carmer, S.G., Nyquist, W.E., Walker, W.M. 1989. Least significant differences for combined analyses of experiments with two-or three factor treatment designs. Agronomy Journal 81:665–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Doyle, A.D., Shapland, R.A. 1991. Effect of split nitrogen applications on the yield and protein content of dry land wheat in northern New South Wales. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 31:85–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Eberhart, S.A., Russell, W.A. 1966. Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Science 6:36–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Eghbal, M.K., Hajabbasi, M.A., Golsefidi, H.T. 1996. Mechanism of crust formation on a soil in central Iran. Plant and Soil 180:67–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Govaerts, B., Sayre, K.D., Lichter, K., Dendooven, L., Deckers, J. 2007. Influence of permanent raised bed planting and residue management on physical and chemical soil quality in rain fed maize/wheat systems. Plant and Soil. 291:39–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Govaerts, B., Barrera-Franco, M.G., Limón-Ortega, A., Muñoz-Jiménez, P., Sayre, K.D., Deckers J. 2008. Clasificación y evaluación edafológica de tres sitios experimentales del altiplano central de México. Tropicultura (In press).Google Scholar
  7. Kirkham, M.B., Kanemasu, E.T. 1983. Wheat. In: Teare, I.D., Pet, M. (eds), Crop Water Relations. John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY, pp. 481–520.Google Scholar
  8. Moreno, O., Salazar, M., Tamayo, M., Martinez, J. 1993. Tecnologia para la produccion de trigo en surcos. Folleto Tecnico 22: SARH, INIFAP, Cd. Obregon, Sonora, Mexico.Google Scholar
  9. Novoa, R., Loomis, R.S. 1981. Nitrogen and plant production. Plant and Soil 58:177–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Olson, R.A. 1984. Nitrogen use in dryland farming under semiarid conditions. In: Houck, R.D. (ed.), Nitrogen in Crop Production, American Society of Agronomy — Crop and Soil Science of America — Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI, pp. 335–347.Google Scholar
  11. Rao, S.C., Dao, T.H. 1992. Fertilizer placement and tillage effects of nitrogen assimilation by wheat. Agronomy Journal 84:1028–1032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Raun, W.R., Solie, J.B., Johnson, G.V., Stone, M.L., Mullen, R.W., Freeman, K.W., Thomason, W.E., Lukina, E.V. 2002. Improving nitrogen use efficiency in cereal grain production with optical sensing and variable rate application. Agronomy Journal 94:815–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Sayre, K.D. 1998 Ensuring the use of sustainable crop management strategies by small wheat farmers in the 21st century. Wheat Special Report No 48. Mexico, D.F.: CIMMYT.Google Scholar
  14. SAGARPA. 2006.’ Sistema de Informacion Agroalimentaria de Consulta.’ [Online January 2007] (https://doi.org/www.siap.sagarpa.gob.mx/ar_comanuar.html)
  15. SAS Institute. 1989. SAS/STAT: Users guide. Version 6, 4 th ed. SAS Inst., Cary, NC.Google Scholar
  16. Sowers, K.E., Pan, W.L., Miller, B.C., Smith, J.L. 1994. Nitrogen use efficiency of split nitrogen applications in soft white winter wheat. Agronomy Journal 86:942–948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Sweeney, D.W., Sisson, J.B. 1988. Effect of ridge planting and N-application methods on wheat grown in somewhat poorly drained soils. Soil and Tillage Research 12:187–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Tripathi, S.C., Sayre, K.D., Kaul, J.N., Narang, R.S. 2002. Effect of planting methods and N rates on lodging, morphological characters of culm and yield in spring wheat varieties. Cereal Res. Comm. 30:431–438.Google Scholar
  19. Westfall, D.G., Havlin, J.L., Hergert, G.W., Raun, W.R. 1996. Nitrogen management in dryland cropping systems. Journal of Production Agriculture 9:192–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Limon-Ortega
    • 1
    Email author
  • E. Villaseñor-Mir
    • 1
  • E. Espitia-Rangel
    • 1
  1. 1.INIFAP-CEVAMEXChapingoMexico

Personalised recommendations