Cutting Management of Dual Purpose Wheat Cultivars: A New Approach for Increasing Fodder Availability

Abstract

North West Himalaya Region of India faces serious shortage of green fodder up to 60 percent, particularly in winter months of November to March. Possibility of augmenting green fodder availability from cultivated lands, which is very limited (10% of geographical area) is explored by cultivation of dual purpose wheat, providing green fodder a part from grain production. Influence of wheat variation and their cutting schedule on fodder and grain yield were studied. Selected wheat varieties included VL Gehun 829, VL Gehun 616 and advance lines of VL 818 and VL 840, respectively. Significantly higher green fodder yield (69.32 q/ha) was obtained from VL 818 than under VL Gehun 616 and VL Gehun 829, while it was at per with fodder yield of VL 840. Cutting of green fodder scheduled at 70 and 85 DAS resulted no significant difference in yield. However, it showed the possibility of extended availability of green fodder without affecting the production the grain and straw yield obtained under VL Gehun 829 (60.05 q and 121.5 q/ha, respectively) were statistically superior to VL Gehun 616 and VL 818 and at par with VL 840. Harvest of green fodder affected grain yield of wheat up to 7% through it was not statistically significant. Therefore, it can be concluded that among the different cultivar VL Gehun 829 and VL 840 are the most suitable for dual purpose and can be cut after 70 and 85 DAS for green fodder as both stage of cut produced at par green fodder, grain and straw yields, thereby ensuring fodder and food security in the region.

References

  1. Bishnoi, B.R., Hughes, J.I. 1979. Agronomic performance and protein contents of tall planted triticale, wheat and rye. Agronomy Journal 71:350–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bisht, J.K., Chandra, S., Singh, R.D., Gupta, H.S. 2004. Role of nitrogen in the yield enhancement of clipped wheat. Tropical Agriculture. 51:211–215.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brown, A.R., Almodares, A. 1976. Quantity and quality of the triticale fodder compared to other small grains. Agronomy Journal 68:264–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dunphy, D.J., McDaniel, M.E., Holt, E.C. 1982. Effect of fodder utilization on wheat grain yield. Crop Science 22:106–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gomez, A.K., Gomez, A.A. 1976. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. John Wiley and Sons, Inc. Toronto, pp. 671.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Poysa, V.W. 1985. Effect of fodder harvest on grain yield and agronomic performance of winter triticale, wheat and rye. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 65:879–886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Royo, C., Pares, D., 1996. Yield and quality of winter and spring triticale of fodder and grain. Grass Fodder Science 51:449–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Royo, C., Insa, J.A., Boujenna, A., Ramos, J.M., Montensions, E., Gracia del Moral, J.F. 1994. Yield and quality of spring triticale used for fodder and grain as influenced by sowing date and cutting stage. Field Crops Research 37:161–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Royo, C., Saller, C., Romagosa, I. 1995. Agronomical and morphological differentiation among winter and spring triticale. Plant Breeding 114:413–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. K. Bisht.

Rights and permissions

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bisht, J.K., Kant, L. & Srivastva, A.K. Cutting Management of Dual Purpose Wheat Cultivars: A New Approach for Increasing Fodder Availability. CEREAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS 36, 177–187 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1556/CRC.36.2008.1.18

Download citation

Keywords

  • wheat varieties
  • cutting management
  • green and dry fodder
  • dual purpose varieties