Cereal Research Communications

, Volume 35, Issue 4, pp 1583–1592 | Cite as

Translocation of Dry Matter in Ten Winter Wheat Cultivars Released in the Years 1921–2003

  • M. UzikEmail author
  • A. Zofajova


Set of 10 winter wheat cultivars was evaluated in pot experiment at 4 levels of N-fertilization (0, 30, 60, 90 kg ha−1) with the aim to find out contribution of above ground and root translocated biomass on increasing of grain yield of modern cultivars. Modern semi-dwarf cultivars headed earlier, accumulated less above ground biomass till heading, but more root biomass and their intensity of root biomass accumulation was higher than at old cultivars. The highest root biomass produced cultivar Astella, carrying Rht1. On the doubled grain yield of modern cultivars grain number per ear (r=0.907++) contributed more than grain weight (r=0.889++) and ear number per plant (r=−0.512) lowered moderately with the year of cultivar release. Grain yield increased as a result of higher harvest index, without increasing biomass production. Translocation of above ground biomass increased with the year of cultivar release, except of the semi-dwarf, earliest cultivar Kosutka. In all cultivars, root biomass was decreasing from the heading to the maturity and their contribution on translocated dry matter in grain was three times higher than from above ground biomass. Portion of total biomass translocated in grain varied among cultivars from 2.34% (Kosutka) to 41.51% (Astella).


translocation above ground dry matter root dry matter winter wheat cultivars 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Austin, R.B., Bingham, J., Blackwell, R.D., Evans, L.T., Ford, M.A., Morgan, C.L., Taylor, M. 1980. Genetic improvements in winter wheat yields since 1900 and associated physiological changes. J. Agric. Sci. 94:675–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blum, A. 1998. Improving wheat grain filling under stress by stem reserve mobilisation. Euphytica 100:77–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blum, A., Sinmena, B., Mayer, J., Golan, G., Shpiler, L. 1994. Stem reserve mobilisation supports wheat grain filling under heat stress. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 21:771–781.Google Scholar
  4. Blum, A., Sullivan, C.Y. 1997. The effect of plant size on wheat response to agents of drought stress. I. Root drying. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 24:35–41.Google Scholar
  5. Brancourt Hulmel, M., Doussinault, G., Lecomte, C., Berard, P., LeBuanec, B., Trottet, M. 2003. Genetic improvement of agronomic traits of winter wheat cultivars released in France from 1946 to 1992. Crop Sci. 43:37–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Flintham, J.E., Borner, A., Worland, A.J., Gale, M.D. 1997. Optimising wheat grain yield: effects of Rht (gibberellin-insensitive) dwarfing genes. J. Agric. Sci. Cambridge, 128:11–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kobata, T., Palta, J.A., Turner, N.C. 1992. Rate of development of postanthesis water deficits and grain filling of spring wheat. Crop Sci. 32:1238–1242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Miralles, D.J., Slafer, G.A., Lynch, V. 1997. Rooting patterns in near-isogenic lines of spring wheat for dwarfism. Plant and Soil 197:79–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Pheloung, P.C., Siddique, K.H.M. 1991. Contribution of stem dry matter to grain yield in wheat cultivars. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 18:53–64.Google Scholar
  10. Przulj, N., Momčilović, V. 2001. Genetic variation for dry matter and nitrogen accumulation and translocation in two rowed spring barley. I. Dry matter translocation. Eur. J. Agron. 15:241–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Shearman, V.J., Sylvester Bradley, R., Scott, R.K., Foulkes, M.J. 2005. Physiological processes associated with wheat yield progress in the UK. Crop Sci. 45:175–185.Google Scholar
  12. Siddique, K.H., Belford, R.K., Tennant, D. 1990. Root:shoot ratios of old and modern, tall and semi-dwarf wheats in a Mediterranean environment. Plant Soil 121:89–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Uzik, M., Zofajova, A. 2003a. Accumulation and translocation of dry matter of different genotypes of spring barley (in Slovakian). Agriculture 49:559–569.Google Scholar
  14. Uzik, M., Zofajova, A. 2003b. Advance in agronomical traits in Czech-Slovak winter wheat varieties realised in 1923–1995 (in Slovakian). Acta Fytotechnica et Zootechnica 6:93–100.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.SCAR - Research Institute of Plant ProductionPiestanySlovakia

Personalised recommendations