Advertisement

Cereal Research Communications

, Volume 35, Issue 4, pp 1723–1732 | Cite as

Evaluation of CERES-Rice Model (V. 4.0) Under Temperate Conditions of Kashmir Valley, India

  • H. SinghEmail author
  • K. N. Singh
  • B. Hasan
Article

Abstract

The CERES-rice model (version 4.0) was calibrated and validated using the data from a field experiment carried out during the rainy season of 2004 and 2005 at Shalimar, Srinagar (35° 5′ N latitude and 74° 89′ E longitude, 1587 m above the mean sea level, India. The experiment included six rice cultivars each transplanted on 25 May, 10 June and 25 June. Data of 25 May transplanting was used for model calibration and development of the genetic coefficients of the rice cultivars. The predicted and observed dates of phenological events were in close agreement with root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE) and D-index of 5.0 days, 4.3 days and 0.91, respectively, for anthesis and 3.7 days, 3.1 days and 0.91, respectively, for physiological maturity of the crop. The predicted and observed grain yields were also very close with a RMSE of 0.63 Mg ha−1, MAE of 0.58 Mg ha−1 and D-index of 0.89, respectively. Corresponding values for above ground biomass was 1.17 Mg ha−1, 1.01 Mg ha−1 and 0.82. Sensitivity test showed that simulated yield responded to temperature and atmospheric CO 2 concentration. Nitrogen 240 kg ha−1 at 25 May transplanting, recorded highest simulated grain yield (9.71 Mg ha−1). Further, 3 seedlings hill−1 produced highest simulated grain yield. The results suggest that the model can be applied in the temperate Kashmir to estimate crop productivity and optimize the management practices.

Keywords

temperate rice cultivars transplanting dates CERES-Rice calibration validation sensitivity simulation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aggarwal, P.K., Mall, R.K. 2002. Climate change and rice yields in diverse agro-environments of India. 11. Effects of uncertainties in scenarios and models on impact assessment. Climate Change 52:331–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aggarwal, P.K., Kalra, N., Chander, S., Pathak, H. 2005. InfoCrop: A dynamic simulation Model for the assessment of crop yields losses due to pests, and environment impact of agro-ecosystems in tropical environments. I. Model description. Agril Systems. 89:1–25.Google Scholar
  3. Chapman, S.C., Cooper, M., Hammer, G.L., Butler, D.G. 2000. Genotype by environment interactions affecting grain sorghum. II. Frequencies of differential seasonal pattern of drought stress are related to location effects on hybrid yields. Australian journal of Agriculture Research 51:45–63.Google Scholar
  4. Hartkamp, A.D., White, J.W., Rossing, W.A.H., Van Ittersum, M.K., Bakker, E.J., Rabbinage, R. 2004. Regional application of a cropping systems simulation model: Crop residue retention in maize production systems of Jalisco, Mexico. Agriculture Systems 82:117–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hundal, S.S., Kaur, P. 1999. Evaluation of agronomic practices for rice using computer simulation model, CERES-Rice. Oryza 36:63–65.Google Scholar
  6. Hunt, L.A., Boote, K.J. 1998. Data for model operation, calibration and validation. In: Tsuji, G.Y., Hoogenboom, G., Thornton, P.K. (eds), Understanding Options for Agricultural Production. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Great Britain, pp. 9–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hunt, L.A., Pararajasingham, S., Wiersma, J.V. 1996. Effects of planting date on the development and yield of spring wheat: Simulation of field data. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 76:51–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Mahmood, R. 1997. Impacts of air temperature variations on the boro-rice phenology in Bangladesh: Implications for irrigation requirements. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 84: 233–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Pathak, H., Li, C., Wassmann, R., Ladha, J.K. 2006. Simulation of nitrogen balance in the Rice-Wheat Systems of the Indo-Gangetic Plains. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 70:1612–1622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Pathak, H., Li, C., Wassmann, R. 2005. Greenhouse gas emissions from Indian rice fields: Calibration and upscaling using the DNDC model. Biogeosciences 2:113–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Singh, K.N., Khan, G.M., Shah, M.H. 2005. Effect of transplanting date and nutrient management on yield and spikelet sterility of rice in Kashmir. Oryza 42:37–40.Google Scholar
  12. Toit, A.S., Toit, D.L. 2003. Short description of the model statistical package and weather Analogue programme. (DSSAT Manual V.4) University of Florida, Gainesville, USA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir, ShalimarSrinagarIndia

Personalised recommendations