Advertisement

Cereal Research Communications

, Volume 35, Issue 3, pp 1415–1425 | Cite as

The Effect of Seed Size on Tissue Culture Response of Callus from Endosperm-supported Mature Embryos of Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)

  • M. ÖzgenEmail author
  • M. Yildiz
  • N. Koyuncu
  • S. Önde
Article

Abstract

Although immature embryos are the most suitable explants to regenerate cereals, their limited availability throughout the year hampers frequent experimentation. In order to circumvent this problem, endosperm-supported mature embryos, which are available throughout the year, are proposed for utilization in cereal tissue culture studies. In the present study, the effect of seed size on in vitro seed germination, seedling growth, callus induction and plant regeneration, as well as the relationships between these parameters, were investigated in three barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) genotypes. Seeds were designated as large or small for each genotype and seed germinations were achieved in Petri dishes between two sheets of pre-wetted filter paper. Germination percentages of seeds, seedling growth rates, shoot and root lengths, and seedling fresh and dry weights were examined. Mature embryos from imbibed and dehulled seeds were aseptically moved slightly with a scalpel. For callus induction, 8 mg 1−1, 2,4-D dissolved in water, and for plant regeneration, hormone-free MS medium, was utilized. Highest values with respect to seed germination percentage, seedling growth, callus induction and plant regeneration were obtained using large seeds. Rooting of regenerated shoots and plantlet recovery were also successfully achieved. Based on the significant positive correlations observed between all parameters, we concluded that cultures derived from endosperm-supported mature embryos within large seeds should be employed for achieving superior tissue culture response.

Keywords

barley callus induction germination plant regeneration seed size 

Abbriviation

2,4-D

2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid

MS

Murashige and Skoog

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aiken, G.E., Springer, T.L. 1995. Seed size distribution, germination, and emergence of 6 switchgrass cultivars. Journal of Range Management 48:455–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anonymous. 1985. Seed Science and Technology. ISTA, Vol. 13. No. 2.Google Scholar
  3. Bonfil, C. 1998. The effect of seed size, cotyledon reserves, and herbivory on seedling survival and growth in Quercus rugosa and Q. laurina (Fagaceae). American Journal of Botany 85:79–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ching, T.M., Rynd, L. 1978. Developmental differences in embryos of high and low protein wheat seeds during germintion. Plant Physiology 62:866–870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dale, P.J., Deambrogio, E.A. 1979. Comparison of callus induction and plant regeneration from different explants of Hordeum vulgare. Zeitschrift für Pflanzenphysiologie 94:65–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Goldstein, C.S., Kronstad, W.E. 1986. Tissue culture and plant regeneration from immature embryo explants of barley, Hordeum vulgare L. Theoretical and Applied Genetic 71:631–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Green, J.C., Bransby, D.I. 1995. Effects of seed size on germination and seedling growth of ‘Alamo’ switchgrass. In: West, N.E. (ed.), Proc. Int. Rangel. Congr., 5th, Salt Lake City, UT. 23–28 July 1995. Soc. for Range Management, Denver, CO, Vol. 1, pp. 183–184.Google Scholar
  8. Gupta, S.K., Pathak, P.S., Roy, R.D. 1983. Seedling growth of Leucaena leucocephala (Lam.) de Wit. II. Effect of seed size. Indian Journal of Forestry 6:202–204.Google Scholar
  9. Hanzel, J.J., Miller, J.P., Brinkmann, M.A., Fendos, E. 1985. Genotype and media effects on callus formation and regeneration in barley. Crop Science 25:27–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jelaska, S., Rengel, Z., Cesar, V. 1984. Plant regeneration from mesocotyl callus of Hordeum vulgare L. Plant Cell Reports 3:125–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kato, K., Chowdhury, S.H., Harada, S. 1991. Effect of culture condition on plant regeneration capacity of mature embryo derived callus in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Wheat Information Service 72:95–97.Google Scholar
  12. Khurana, E., Singh, U.S. 2001. Ecology of seed and seedling growth for conservation and restoration of tropical dry forest: a review. Environmental Conservation 28:39–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lowe, L.B., Ayers, G.S., Ries, S.K. 1972. Relationship of seed protein and amino acid composition to seedling vigor and yield of wheat. Agronomy Journal 64:608–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lowe, L.B., Ries, S.K. 1972. Effects of environment on the relation between seed protein and seedling vigor in wheat. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 52:157–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lowe, L.B., Ries, S.K. 1973. Endosperm protein of wheat seed as a determinant of seedling growth. Plant Physiology 51:57–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lupotto, E. 1984. Callus induction and plant regeneration from barley mature embryos. Annals of Botany 54:523–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mathis, R.J., Simpson, E.S. 1986. The interaction of genotype and culture medium on the tissue culture responses in wheat (Triticum aestivum L. em. Thell) callus. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 7:31–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Milberg, P., Lamont, B.B. 1997. Seed/cotyledon size and nutrient content play a major role in early performance of species on nutrient-poor soil. New Phytologist 137:665–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Negi, A.K., Todaria, N.P. 1997. Effect of seed size and weight on germination pattern and seedling development of some multi-purpose tree species of Garhwal Himalaya. Indian Forester 123:32–36.Google Scholar
  20. Orton, T.J. 1979. A quantitative analysis of growth and regeneration from tissue cultures Hordeum vulgare, Hordeum jubatum and their interspecific hybrids. Environmental and Experimental Botany 19:319–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Özgen, M., Türet, M., Altinok, S., Sancak, C. 1998. Efficient callus induction and plant regeneration from mature embryo culture of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes. Plant Cell Reports 18:331–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rengel, Z., Jelaska, S. 1986. Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from seedling tissues of Hordeum vulgare L. J. Plant Physiology 124:385–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ries, S.K. 1971. The relationship of size and protein content of bean seed with growth and yield. Proceedings of the American Society of Horticultural Science 96:557–560.Google Scholar
  24. Roach, D.A. 1987. Variation in seed and seedling size in Anthoxanthum odoratum. American Midland Naturalist 90:493–498.Google Scholar
  25. Sayar, M.T., Birsin, M.A., Ulukan, H., Özgen, M. 1999. Effect of seed size on the tissue culture response of callus from mature embryos of wheat species. Wheat Information Service 89:1–6.Google Scholar
  26. Seiwa, K., Kikuzawa, K. 1991. Phenology of tree seedlings in relation to seed size. Canadian Journal of Botany 69:532–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Smart, A.J., Moser, L.E. 1999. Switchgrass seedling development as affected by seed size. Agronomy Journal 91:335–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Snedecor, G.W., Cochran, W.G. 1967. Statistical Methods. The Iowa State University Press, Iowa, USA.Google Scholar
  29. Thomas, M.R., Scott, K.J. 1985. Plant regeneration by somatic embryogenesis from callus initiated from immature embryos and immature inflorescences of Hordeum vulgare. Journal of Plant Physiology 121:159–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tripathi, R.S., Khan, M.L. 1990. Effects of seed weight and microsite characteristics on germination and seedling fitness in two species of Quercus in a subtropical wet hill forest. Oikos 57:289–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tuchisawa, M., Enomoto, S., Ohyama, K. 1986. Plant regeneration from callus of immature barley embryos. Japanese Journal of Breeding 36:28–29.Google Scholar
  32. Ward, K.A., Jordan, M.C. 2001. Callus formation and plant regeneration from immature and mature embryos of rye (Secale cereale L.). In Vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology-Plant 37:361–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Weigel, R.C., Hughes, K.W. 1985. Long term regeneration by somatic embryogenesis in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) tissue cultures derived from apical meristem explants. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 5:151–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Yildiz, M., Özgen, M. 2004. The effect of a submersion pretreatment on in vitro explant growth and shoot regeneration from hypocotyls of flax (Linum usitatissimum). Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 77:111–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Field Crops, Faculty of AgricultureAnkara UniversityDiskapi, AnkaraTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science and ArtMiddle East Technical UniversityAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations