Study of the Relationship Between Sprouting Score and Sprout Damage in Durum Wheat (Triticum turgidum L. var.durum)
Sprout damage in durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L. var. durum) is caused by pre-harvest sprouting. It reduces seed quality and causes a loss of starch gel viscosity, which negatively affects the pasta industry. The objectives of this research were to study the relationship between sprouting score and sprout damage in two durum wheat populations grown at Langdon, and Prosper, ND, to test the sensitivity of the stirring number test compared with the falling number test for estimating sprout damage, and to evaluate the effect of cutting date on sprout damage. A negative correlation between sprouting and sprout damage was detected in both populations. The stirring number test was more sensitive than the falling number method, but the two tests were positively correlated when sprouted and sound seeds were used. Cutting date did not significantly affect sprouting score. There was no significant cutting date × genotype interaction. Viscosity loss due to sprouting was complete in the two populations.
Keywordsdurum wheat pre-harvest sprouting sprout damage falling number stirring number
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- American Association of Cereal Chemists. Approved Methods of AACC. 2000. Approved methods of the AACC, 10th ed. Method 56-81B, Method 22-08. The Association, St Paul, MN.Google Scholar
- Gomez, K.A., Gomez, A.A. 1984. Statistical procedures for agricultural Research (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.Google Scholar
- Grant, L.A., Dick, J.W., Shelton, D.R. 1993. Effects of drying temperature, starch damage, sprouting, and additives on spaghetti quality characteristics. Cereal Chem. 70:676–684.Google Scholar
- Hammond, J.J. 1992. Statistical Analysis Program. Department of Plant Sciences, North Dakota State Univ., Fargo, ND. (verified, April 10, 2006). http://www.ndsu.nodak.edu/instruct/hammond/index.htmGoogle Scholar
- MacArthur, L.A., D’Appolonia, B.L., Banasik, O.J. 1981. The falling number test — What is it and how does it work? North Dakota Agricultural Exp. Sta., Farm Res. 38:15–22.Google Scholar
- Manthey, F., Hinsz, B.L., Osborne, J.H. 2000. Regional Wheat Quality Report. Cereal Sci. Dept., North Dakota State Univ., Fargo, ND.Google Scholar
- McMaster, G.J., Derera, N.F. 1976. Methodology and sample preparation when screening for sprouting damage in cereals. Cereal Res. Comm. 4:251–254.Google Scholar
- Quick, J.S. 1980. Registration of ‘Vic’ durum wheat. Crop Sci. 20:827.Google Scholar
- Ross, A.S., Walker, C.E., Booth, R.I., Orth, R.A., Wrigley, C.W. 1987. The rapid visco-analyzer: a new technique for the estimation of sprout damage. Cereal Foods World 32:827–829.Google Scholar
- SAS Institute Inc. 1988. SAS User’s Guide Release 6.03. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.Google Scholar
- Sodkiewicz, W. 2002. Diploid wheat — Triticum monococcum as a source of resistance genes to preharvest sprouting of triticale. Cereal Res. Comm. 30:323–328.Google Scholar
- Xia, S.Y., Elias, E.M. 1994. Evaluation of pre-harvest dormancy in durum Wheat. In: Agronomy Abstracts. ASA, Madison, WI. p. 127.Google Scholar