Advertisement

Cereal Research Communications

, Volume 35, Issue 1, pp 53–61 | Cite as

Study of the Relationship Between Sprouting Score and Sprout Damage in Durum Wheat (Triticum turgidum L. var.durum)

  • J. R. GelinEmail author
  • E. M. Elias
  • F. A. Manthey
  • L. Grant
Article

Abstract

Sprout damage in durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L. var. durum) is caused by pre-harvest sprouting. It reduces seed quality and causes a loss of starch gel viscosity, which negatively affects the pasta industry. The objectives of this research were to study the relationship between sprouting score and sprout damage in two durum wheat populations grown at Langdon, and Prosper, ND, to test the sensitivity of the stirring number test compared with the falling number test for estimating sprout damage, and to evaluate the effect of cutting date on sprout damage. A negative correlation between sprouting and sprout damage was detected in both populations. The stirring number test was more sensitive than the falling number method, but the two tests were positively correlated when sprouted and sound seeds were used. Cutting date did not significantly affect sprouting score. There was no significant cutting date × genotype interaction. Viscosity loss due to sprouting was complete in the two populations.

Keywords

durum wheat pre-harvest sprouting sprout damage falling number stirring number 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. American Association of Cereal Chemists. Approved Methods of AACC. 2000. Approved methods of the AACC, 10th ed. Method 56-81B, Method 22-08. The Association, St Paul, MN.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, J. A., Sorrells, M.E., Tanksley, S.D. 1993. RFLP analysis of genomic regions associated with resistance to pre-harvest sprouting in wheat. Crop Sci. 33:453–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Elias, M.E. 1998. Registration of ‘Ben’ durum wheat. Crop Sci. 38:895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gelin, J.R., Elias, E.M., Kianian, S.F. 2006. Evaluation of two durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L. var. durum) crosses for pre-harvest sprouting resistance. Field Crops Res. 97:188–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gomez, K.A., Gomez, A.A. 1984. Statistical procedures for agricultural Research (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  6. Grant, L.A., Dick, J.W., Shelton, D.R. 1993. Effects of drying temperature, starch damage, sprouting, and additives on spaghetti quality characteristics. Cereal Chem. 70:676–684.Google Scholar
  7. Hammond, J.J. 1992. Statistical Analysis Program. Department of Plant Sciences, North Dakota State Univ., Fargo, ND. (verified, April 10, 2006). http://www.ndsu.nodak.edu/instruct/hammond/index.htmGoogle Scholar
  8. MacArthur, L.A., D’Appolonia, B.L., Banasik, O.J. 1981. The falling number test — What is it and how does it work? North Dakota Agricultural Exp. Sta., Farm Res. 38:15–22.Google Scholar
  9. Manthey, F., Hinsz, B.L., Osborne, J.H. 2000. Regional Wheat Quality Report. Cereal Sci. Dept., North Dakota State Univ., Fargo, ND.Google Scholar
  10. McMaster, G.J., Derera, N.F. 1976. Methodology and sample preparation when screening for sprouting damage in cereals. Cereal Res. Comm. 4:251–254.Google Scholar
  11. Panozzo, J.F., McCormick, K.M. 1993. The rapid viscoanalyser as a method of testing for noodle quality in a wheat breeding programme. J. Cereal Sci. 17:25–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Quick, J.S. 1980. Registration of ‘Vic’ durum wheat. Crop Sci. 20:827.Google Scholar
  13. Ross, A.S., Walker, C.E., Booth, R.I., Orth, R.A., Wrigley, C.W. 1987. The rapid visco-analyzer: a new technique for the estimation of sprout damage. Cereal Foods World 32:827–829.Google Scholar
  14. SAS Institute Inc. 1988. SAS User’s Guide Release 6.03. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.Google Scholar
  15. Stahl, M., Steiner, A.M. 1998. Germination and vigour loss of non-sprouted and sprouted wheat seeds during storage — testing the viability constants. Seed Sci. Res. 8:123–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Sodkiewicz, W. 2002. Diploid wheat — Triticum monococcum as a source of resistance genes to preharvest sprouting of triticale. Cereal Res. Comm. 30:323–328.Google Scholar
  17. Udall, J.A., Souza, E., Anderson, J., Sorrels, M.E., Zemetra, R.S. 1999. Quantitative trait loci for flour viscosity in winter wheat. Crop Sci. 39:238–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Xia, S.Y., Elias, E.M. 1994. Evaluation of pre-harvest dormancy in durum Wheat. In: Agronomy Abstracts. ASA, Madison, WI. p. 127.Google Scholar
  19. Zanetti, S., Winseler, M., Keller, B., Messmer, M. 2000. Genetic analysis of pre-harvest sprouting in a wheat × spelt cross. Crop Sci. 40:1406–1417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. R. Gelin
    • 1
    Email author
  • E. M. Elias
    • 1
  • F. A. Manthey
    • 1
  • L. Grant
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Plant SciencesNorth Dakota State UniversityFargoUSA
  2. 2.Hard Red Spring and Durum Wheat Quality Laboratory, USDA / ARSNorth Dakota State UniversityFargoUSA

Personalised recommendations