Advertisement

Cereal Research Communications

, Volume 33, Issue 2–3, pp 525–531 | Cite as

Comparison of selection indices for screening maize (Zea mays L.) germplasm for cold tolerance

  • Gul ZaffarEmail author
  • Asif B. Shikari
  • M. Ashraf Rather
  • S. K. Guleria
Article

Abstract

The comparisons among the 6 selection indices S1, S2, S3 (simultaneous selection indices comprising of X1 only; X1+X5 and X1+X2+X3+X4 respectively as their component traits), S4 (Rank summation index), S5 (Baker’s standard deviation index) and S6 (Elston’s weight free index) were made involving 4 primary cold tolerance traits namely field emergence per cent (X1), fresh seedling root mass (X2), seedling dry weight (X3), days to 50% silk emergence (X5) along with grain yield ha-1 (X4). Highly significant rank correlations of proposed selection indices conferred the suitability in use of one index if substituted for other, to score the genotypes for selection. Selection differentials for all the indices were generally positive with respect to the traits X1, X2, X3 and X4 except S2 which, was accompanied with negative differentials for X2, X3 and X4. S1 was found to be an important cold tolerance trait depicting not so less differentials compared to other traits and had positive differentials under each selection criteria. Index S6 was efficient in selecting early silking varieties with high yield and tolerance to cold. The populations NDSM 8 WN, NDSAB (MER), NDSLC and land races GL20W and Dawar-2 showed high degree of cold tolerance among 67 genotypes evaluated and showed at par results with the C15 check which was top ranking under 5 out of 6 selection used.

Keywords

Maize (Zea mays L.) cold tolerance selection indices 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andrew, R.H. 1984. Breeding Maize for cold resistance. Euphytica. 3: 108–116.Google Scholar
  2. Baker, RJ. 1974. Selection indices without economic weights for animal breeding. Canadian Journal of Animal Sciences. 54: 1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Elston, R.C. 1963. A weight-free index for the purpose of ranking or selection with respect to several traits at a time. Biometrics. 29: 85–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Mock, J.J. and McNeill, M.J. 1979. Cold tolerance of maize inbred lines adapted to various latitudes in North America. Crop Science. 19: 239–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Mock, J.J. and Skrdla, W.H. 1978. Evaluation of Maize Plant Introductions for cold tolerance. Euphytica. 27: 27–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Pesev, N.V. 1970. Genetic factors affecting corn tolerance to low temperatures at emergence and germination. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 40: 351–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Pollmer, W.G. 1969. Keimung and Wachstum von Maisvarietaten bei niedrigen Temperatures. Bayerisches Landwirtschaftliches Jahrbuch 46: 279–288.Google Scholar
  8. Smith, H.F. 1936. A discriminant function for plant selection Ann. Eugenics. 7: 242–250.Google Scholar
  9. Yu, J.; Tuinstra, M.R.; Claassen, M.M; Gordon, W.B. and Witt, M.D. 2004. Analysis of cold tolerance in sorghum under controlled environment conditions. Held Crops Reseaarch 85: 21–30.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest 2005

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gul Zaffar
    • 1
    Email author
  • Asif B. Shikari
    • 1
  • M. Ashraf Rather
    • 1
  • S. K. Guleria
    • 2
  1. 1.Division of Plant Breeding & GeneticsSher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences & Technology of KashmirShalimar Srinagar, J&KIndia
  2. 2.CSHPKVKulluIndia

Personalised recommendations